Six Months
The standard today is the six-month recall, set in
stone by insurance companies. It isn’t based on science,
but rather by toothpaste advertising many decades ago.
Some think it was Amos and Andy on the radio talking
about Pepsodent while others attribute it to Bucky
Beaver and Ipana toothpaste with the 1941 Dental
Health Achievement Certificate that encouraged good
oral hygiene and seeing the dentist twice a year.
Despite the lack of scientific evidence supporting
six-month recalls, they continue. A study done in
Sweden evaluated two-week dental hygiene visits provided
in the school clinic. One hundred children saw
the hygienist every two weeks for oral hygiene instructions,
cleaning and fluoride. Another group of 100
children saw their family dentist and hygienist at traditional
intervals. After two years, most of the 100 kids
seeing the hygienist every two weeks had no new decay
or gingivitis – a success. However, a few kids were at
greater risk for decay, and despite good care, that small
subgroup developed a total of 19 carious lesions. As
bad as that sounds, results were much worse for kids in
the control group with a total of 575 carious lesions.
Regular six-month recalls didn’t work for these kids.
Three Months
Indirectly we see that not all patients on three-month
recalls are doing well. Study researchers often
report subjects for a periodontal study were selected
from those receiving regular perio maintenance visits
every three months, but qualified for the study having
5mm pockets with bleeding. Three months didn’t
work for them. Studies measuring bacterial re-growth
following instrumentation reported return to baseline
levels at eight to 10 weeks. That’s closer to two
months, not three.
Two Weeks
There is research to support a two-week interval to
reverse gingivitis or establish tissue health. In 1965, Dr.
Harold Löe reported his research on experimental gingivitis
in man, now considered a classic study. With no
oral hygiene, people develop gingivitis in two weeks.
Resuming oral hygiene reverses gingivitis. Many
researchers use the two-week recall for several months
after surgery, before moving to a longer interval.
For patients with active disease, the two-week
interval can stop disease progression. This is really
therapy, and not a recall to maintain health. It’s an
option for patients showing signs of active breakdown,
those with a compromised immune system, or for
patients going through times of stress interfering with
normal plaque control routines.
Individualized Intervals
The primary criteria suggested by researchers is history
of past disease, suggesting that those with 2mm of
attachment loss should be considered at risk for further
periodontal breakdown and therefore be seen more often
than people with no attachment loss. Periodontally
healthy patients with no attachment loss can be seen
every 12 months. According to published research six-month
visits provided no added periodontal value.
Establishing a foundation of excellent oral hygiene
habits will insure health when intervals are lengthened.
Risk factors that compromise healing or predispose
people to disease progression are smoking, diabetes,
poor oral hygiene, genetics, age, and medications that
dry the mouth. Just remember, patients should come
in for recall visits healthy – no bleeding and no calculus.
When that happens, your interval is perfect. You
are indeed keeping healthy people healthy.
|