NTI OmniSplint: Clenching treatment reimagined
by Dr. Stacy Ochoa, D-ABDSM, FICOI
I began using the NTI-tss Plus (Fig. 1)
for my patients who were chewing through
night guards or complaining that the
full-arch appliances were making their
headaches worse. Overwhelmingly, my
patients gave us glowingly positive reports
about their NTIs when they came in for
follow-up appointments.
Fig. 1
During my entrée to the world of
parafunctional control with the NTI therapeutic
protocol, I did encounter some
naysayers—especially a few vocal ones in
certain social media groups. I wondered
if I should stop using it. At the very least,
I had to learn more.
As a doctor, I took an oath to do no
harm. So, I dug deeper to learn more. I read
reams of research, attended CE courses,
befriended the gurus and assessed my
own patients’ experiences.
I’m a dentist, not an epidemiologist
or a neurologist, but during this process
I did learn a lot about the etiology of
migraines and headaches; about anatomy;
and about how and why the NTI works
for my patients.
The most common myths about the NTI
seem to be traceable to some orthodontists
who said the NTI could change bites
by extruding molars or intruding anterior
teeth. The well-intended but misinformed
myths sound something like the following:
MYTH #1: “Anterior open bites develop
when patients wear the NTI
because the posteriors are out
of occlusion and supraerupt.”
Myth busted: The first thing I thought
about was the fact that patients wear the
appliance for only about eight hours,
while they’re asleep. Is that enough time
to cause supraeruption if the teeth are in
normal function the other 16 hours of the
day? During the rest of the day, patients
are eating, swallowing, talking and, yes,
even clenching. According to the research
and my own empirical observations, this
alveolar stimulation is sufficient to eliminate
any supraeruption.
One peer-reviewed study of TMD
patients wearing the NTI for eight weeks
found that no tooth movement occurred
with nightly appliance wear.1 Other studies
have shown that unopposed teeth require
from anywhere from 24 hours2 up to
eight days3 for movement to occur.
Dr. Jim Boyd shared a thought-provoking
anecdote on this topic. He said, “I talked
to an orthodontist who was adamant the appliance causes supraeruption. I asked
him, ‘If you had a patient in treatment and
you needed to extrude #2 and #15, but
you couldn’t place any brackets on them,
couldn’t use an appliance, and the teeth
were in normal function 16 hours every
day, how long would it take to move
those molars?’
“You know what he said? ‘I couldn’t
do it, so maybe it’s actually intrusion.’ ”
That takes us to the next myth…
MYTH #2: “All of the forces from
the appliance are on the
opposing anteriors. This
intrudes them and causes
an anterior open bite.”
Myth busted: I always want what’s
best for my patients—always. So I dug
deeper on this myth. At first glance, it
seems to hold some water: All the bite
forces are centered on the opposing
anteriors while the NTI is worn. The myth
is full of holes and easily debunked when
we consider the device reduces bite
forces by approximately 70%. In this case,
less is more.
MYTH #3: “It’s so small, patients
will swallow it.”
Myth busted: The standard coverage
of the NTI-tss Plus is canine-to-canine.
The small size makes it extremely comfortable
for patients to wear at night.
Several bruxing patients told me, “Uh-uh,
no way, I’m not wearing a nightguard.”
After showing them how small the NTI-tss
Plus is, they changed their minds and
wear it every night.
Relatively speaking, it is very small
and because of this, some clinicians tout
the myth that the device is frequently
swallowed and aspirated. Consider that the
device is much larger than any temp crown
your patient is sleeping in. Also, consider
that the device is custom-fabricated for
an ideal fit. At delivery, we always instruct
patients to use all the force they can
muster to try to remove the device with
their tongue or lips.
Lastly, consider what was found in
the Patterns of Use for an Enhanced
Nociceptive Trigeminal Inhibitory Splint
published in 2011. It documented more
than 78,000 NTI deliveries by more than
500 dentists and there were “no cases
of aspiration verified by radiographic
imaging.” 4
MYTH #4: “It changes people’s bites.”
Myth busted (kind of): Is this true?
Maybe you’ve even seen a case yourself.
They aren’t exactly Yetis, but they’re close.
This claim is tied to the first two
debunked myths. My patients are aware of
this potential side effect because treatment
is explained thoroughly, and they sign an
informed consent form.
In extremely rare occurrences, can
the NTI therapeutic protocol potentially
contribute to a bite change? In Patterns of Use, 512 dentists responsible for the
delivery of 78,711 NTI devices reported
the incidence of bite change to be only
1.6% (Fig. 2).2 This means that bite changes
are uncommon—less than two out of
100 cases. In this same article, 96.8% of
respondents said they would increase NTI
use or continue at the same rate (Fig. 3).
I extrapolate from this what I’ve seen in
my own practice. The immense benefits
far outweigh any uncommon risks.
Now, consider this: Not every side effect
is negative—some are actually desirable.
For example, the drug finasteride was
introduced in 1992 to treat noncancerous
enlargement of the prostate gland, but was
later discovered to regrow hair. Today it’s
marketed under the trade name Propecia
and effectively used by millions to treat
male pattern baldness.5
A common hypothesis among dentists
that frequently prescribe NTI devices is
that the rare bite changes are actually
attributable to muscles relaxing, which
leads to ideal condylar positioning. This
is a positive occurrence. It exposes that
the condyles and thus, the bite, were in
a pathological position.
With this new information, we have
options about how to proceed:
1. Do nothing.
2. Tell the patient to stop wearing it.
3. Refer to an orthodontist.
4. Restore the patient to this new bite.
In my experience over the past decade
of using the NTI therapeutic protocol,
patients usually select Option 1, do nothing.
They are feeling better. Their headaches
and migraines are significantly reduced
or eliminated.
Patients are instructed to bring their
appliances into each of their appointments—
prophy, crown seating, whatever.
After failing to bring in her NTI to the
past couple appointments, I was really
adamant that one patient bring it next
time. She sheepishly admitted that she
had noticed a slight difference in the way
her teeth come together and hasn’t been
bringing the device in because she was
afraid I’d tell her to stop wearing it.
Patients do not want to give up their
device. It’s given them back their lives.
NTI Omnisplint covers
all the bases
(and all the teeth)
To address some dentists’ concerns
and to help them deliver pain-free lives
to their headache, migraine and TMD patients, Glidewell Dental Lab offers the
NTI OmniSplint (Fig. 4), which eliminates
concerns about these myths while still
effectively delivering all the benefits of
the NTI therapeutic protocol.
Fig. 4
The OmniSplint reduces clenching
and bruxing intensity through a full-arch
design. By covering both arches, the
OmniSplint provides patients with a
comfortable solution for their migraines
or tension headaches while eliminating
all concerns of aspiration, supraeruption
of the posterior teeth or long-term use.
It is FDA-cleared for the prevention of
migraines and tension-type headaches.
Although patients’ bite forces are
dramatically reduced with the device,
it doesn’t seem to work for dogs. The
NTI OmniSplint is digitally designed and
3D printed, so it fits accurately each time
and because files are stored, any time Fido
decides to maul a patient’s appliance, we
can easily order a new one from Glidewell
without another records appointment.
This is a simple rule of thumb I share
with my patients: The NTI should never
touch the canines and canines should
never touch the NTI. Because of the
journey I shared here, more than ever I
am confident in my use of the NTI for my
headache, migraine and orofacial pain
patients.
References
1. Arau´jo, CSR , Ralin, TGP, Rodri´guez, JEC,
Marques, L, Dias, CC, and Guimaraes,
AS. “Skeletal Muscle Changes Caused by
the Use of an Occlusal Device: A Study
by Computerized Tomography.” J Young
Pharm, 2021. 13(2): 161–6.
2. Zainal Ariffin, SH, et al. “Cellular and
Molecular Changes in Orthodontic Tooth
Movement.” The Scientific World Journal,
2011. 11: 1788–1803.
3. Kinoshita, Y, Tonooka, K, and Chiba,
M. “The Effect of Hypofunction on the
Mechanical Properties of the Periodontium
in the Rat Mandibular First Molar.” Arch
Oral Biol, 1982. 27(10): 881–5.
4. Blumenfeld, Andrew, et al. “Patterns of Use
for an Enhanced Nociceptive Trigeminal
Inhibitory Splint.” Inside Dentistry, Vol. 7,
Issue 11. https://www.aegisdentalnetwork.
com/id/2011/12/patterns-of-use-foran-
enhanced-nociceptive-trigeminalinhibitory-
splint
5. McClellan, KJ, Markham, A. “Finasteride:
A Review of Its Use in Male Pattern Hair
Loss.” Drugs, 1999 Jan. 57(1): 111–26.
Dr. Stacy Ochoa, D-ABDSM, FICOI, is a general dentist,
practice owner and entrepreneur. Before graduating from
the University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Dentistry
in 2002, Ochoa was a registered dental hygienist and
attended the University of Missouri–St. Louis for premed
studies.
Ochoa has attended and delivered hundreds of hours of
continuing education on the topics of headache, migraine,
TMD, and adult and pediatric sleep-disordered breathing.
For the past decade, she has worked closely with the
St. Louis medical community to develop new clinical
pathways for patient management.