In our office, we frequently are called upon to replace
missing posterior maxillary teeth using dental implants. The
sinus cavity can often be a limiting factor in the ability to place
implants in the posterior maxilla. When teeth are removed, the
sinus will often pneumatize or enlarge, decreasing the available
bone to support dental implants. When the available height is
less than the length of our required implant length, additional
surgery must be done to “re-establish” lost alveolar height.
Classically there have been two well-accepted methods of
performing sinus lift grafts for posterior maxillary implants. An
external sinus lift involves a lateral maxillary osteotomy, followed
by gentle elevation of the Schneiderian membrane. This
allows entrance into the created space below the antrum and
subsequent graft placement. The alternative approach is an
internal (Sommers) sinus lift. This involves in-fracture of the
bone at the apex of the implant osteotomy in a superior direction
to “push” the sinus lining superiorly. This is followed by
graft placement and the implant is placed thereafter. In our
experience, the Sommers lift is highly predictable and can
accommodate a 4mm superior lift predictably and sometimes up
to 6mm. Any implant requiring more than 4-6mm of lift, in our
hands, is best accomplished with an open sinus lift. The open
sinus lift is a procedure that we perform regularly and predictably
in our office.
Case Report:
Diagnosis and Treatment Planning
EB is an otherwise healthy male who reported as a referral
from his general dentist for the replacement of the right maxillary
teeth. The restorative treatment plan called for implants in
#4, #6 and #8 and fabrication of a fixed five-unit bridge. His
panoramic radiograph (Fig. 1)—which we now calibrate electronically
with our digital software, but classically was done with
acetate paper using known magnifications—showed only 4mm
of bone height for the implant in the #4 position.
In our office, we now have the capability to accurately measure
the bone below the sinus cavity using a digitally calibrated
panorex. This is done using a radiographic marker (5mm ball
bearing) and calibrated measuring system built into the software.
When we have at least 4mm of native alveolar bone, it
usually affords us the instance to achieve primary implant stability
at the time of placement. In this case, 10mm length implants
are planned, especially to withstand the occlusal demands of the
proposed restoration.
As an adjunctive treatment-planning tool, we also regularly
use cone beam CT scanning to ensure a healthy, well-aerated
sinus cavity and verify the patency of the osteomeatal complex.
The osteomeatal complex is the natural drainage of the maxillary
sinus into the middle meatus of the nose and its patency is
imperative for healthy sinus drainage and a good surgical outcome.
Our pre-operative surgical consultation also includes a
discussion with the patient regarding the risks and alternatives to
the surgery.
Procedure
After the administration of a local anesthetic with vasoconstrictor
into the maxillary soft tissues, we draw blood from the
antecubital fossa to harvest plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF)
(Fig. 2). This has been well documented to accelerate the healing
response and provides autogenous growth factors to our graft.
The blood is taken to a centrifuge where it is spun and the platelet
layer is isolated and collected (Fig. 3). While our PRGF is being
prepared, we expose the lateral maxilla using a crestal incision
with bilateral vertical releasing incisions (Fig. 4).
An osteotomy is carefully made in the lateral maxillary wall
using rotary instrumentation and the sinus membrane is exposed
(Fig. 5). The lateral sinus wall is gently infractured and lifted
superiorly. In some patients, the Schneiderian membrane can be
very thin and it’s not uncommon to encounter a membrane perforation
(Fig. 6). In this particular case, we show the use of a
resorbable collagen membrane to close a perforation in the thin
sinus membrane after it is lifted (Fig. 7).
Once the sinus membrane is lifted superiorly, the implants are
placed in their appropriate positions based on the restorative
treatment plan and surgical guide (Fig. 8). In this case, there
remains enough alveolar bone to achieve primary stability of the
implant. If there are less than 3mm of alveolar bone height, it is
usually difficult to achieve primary implant stability and therefore
the grafting is done and implant placement is delayed until the
graft has consolidated. Cover screws are placed over the implants
to allow for primary closure when the surgery is finished.
A 50:50 mixture of freeze-dried mineralized bone (DCI
Donor Services Tissue Bank) and irradiated bone (Rocky
Mountain Tissue Bank) is mixed with the activated PRGF.
Calcium chloride is added to the PRGF to “activate” the graft.
The calcium chloride induces activation of the endogenous thrombin and the transformation of fibrinogen into fibrin. This
process forms a coagulum of graft and PRGF, which has excellent
handling properties (Fig. 9). The grafting is placed around the
implants and into the newly created space (Fig. 10). A second
resorbable collage membrane is placed over the lateral maxillary
osteotomy to prevent epithelialization of the graft prior to closure.
The wound is then closed in a tension-free manner with 4-
0 Vicryl (Fig. 11). A post-operative panorex is taken, showing
good implant position and good graft consolidation (Fig. 12).
Post-operative instructions include basic sinus surgery instructions,
a course of broad-spectrum antibiotics and analgesics. In
cases where we encounter a sinus membrane perforation,
Metronidazole is also prescribed post-operatively as secondary
antibiotic coverage.
The implants are allowed to integrate for four months, after
which they are uncovered, and tested for appropriate torque
strength. Healing caps and later, impression posts are placed and
the restorative phase is allowed to begin (Figs. 13-15).
In this particular case, the patient’s final restorative case was carried
out with very nice cosmetic and functional results. This patient
is now more than 10 years removed from surgery and continues to
function well and good aesthetics have been maintained.
|