How healthy are your patients and how healthy
do you want them to be? Answering these questions
will provide the basis for discussing the oral health
philosophy of the practice. This is the focus of our
second in this series of articles on Creating a Perio
Program for Your Practice. Getting the conversation
going between dentist and hygienist is often the
hardest step in this process. We asked clinician and
periodontal therapist, Diane Brucato-Thomas, and
consultants Sarah Cottingham and Jamie Marboe for
insights on how to get this conversation going and
what questions to ask.
Diane Brucato-Thomas, RDH, EF, BS, FAADH:
The first step in getting this conversation going
with the doctor is to identify common values or goals
by asking questions. These questions are not easy, but
help to clarify head and heart. Actually, they are good
questions for the whole team. If the team approaches
these questions together, a common vision for the practice
will begin to emerge. The idea is to identify what
is most important for the dental practice. You may
have a good idea that is really important to your doctor
just by comments made on occasion. Getting the
doctor to voice what is important and building the discussion
around those values will go a long way in advocating
for change.
Often a common value or goal is optimum dental
care. This is the doctor’s practice and his or her reputation
depends on providing optimum dental care. By
providing an evidenced-based periodontal program,
win-wins are created for everyone across the board.
Excellent periodontal health as a foundation lays the
groundwork for all restorative work to follow. The doctor’s
preps will be better if the tissue is healthy, as well
as the quality of the impressions. So the client receives
better quality, longer lasting dental work for their
investment. Successful business follows a good reputation.
That discussion alone can be very convincing.
Adding further discussion about the financial benefits
in terms of production resulting by incorporating
a periodontal treatment program as a successful profit
center for the practice will sell itself. Even with all the
genuine caring in the world, the bottom line for a dentist
must point to financial success for the practice as a
whole, or the practice will fail.
Exactly when this discussion should occur really
depends on the doctor’s style of practice. In one practice
I worked in, the doctor was a genuinely nice guy,
who bought the practice from an elderly dentist who
had retired. He was afraid to tell people that they had
recurrent decay or periodontal disease for fear of losing
them. He did not hold team or staff meetings, so
I talked with him before work one morning. I basically
asked him to trust me and support me by not undoing
my communications regarding periodontal disease
and dental treatment, and “just see what happens,”
because hesitating to speak about their need for treatment
was not serving anyone in any way. He did and
I tripled the hygiene production in one month. In
addition, his production skyrocketed, because he
began providing much needed care. The patients?
Well, they loved him!
In another practice, the discussion took place at a
series of team meetings, before I was even hired. As the
team began to vision the potential of care that could be
provided, the dental hygienist actually invited me in,
because she did not feel comfortable providing
advanced periodontal care. An ideal team was created
and I was able to provide advanced conservative periodontal
therapy within a general practice setting.
Meanwhile my “hygienist partner” provided regular
preventive maintenance for healthy clients. The doctor
enabled the team to buy into creating the vision, and
in turn, the entire team supported the program with
the clients. This practice had an exceptional whole-person,
values-based, team-centered approach to their philosophy
of care. The practice was dynamic, because the
doctor valued the opinions of his team members and
truly cared about them and the clients, like an extension
of his family.
Obviously, not all practices are like this. As pointed
out by the late, Avrom King, dental management guru,
the important thing to realize is that “when they are
ready to hear the next message, they will hear the next
message, and not a moment before!” If they are ready,
as the two doctors highlighted above, the sky is the
limit in terms of quality periodontal care. On the
other hand, the doctor may never be ready to hear
what you have to say. In that case, it is time to understand
that sometimes, the only way to change their
minds is to “literally” change their minds. With a doctor
or practice setting that is closed to change, the best
answer may be following my mother’s advice: “This or
something better!” The right practice for you may be
somewhere else.
Sarah Cottingham, BCS Leadership:
As a consultant, I have the advantage of setting up
a meeting between the dentist and the hygienist. The trick is to get the conversation started and flowing in
the direction of developing a periodontal treatment
philosophy. The first thing I do is ask each one to
write down on a piece of paper their drop-dead criteria
for treating periodontal disease. When they have
finished, I have them exchange papers and see what
the other person wrote, then tell me the other person’s
criteria for treating periodontal disease. Many times
the hygienists will list two criteria: 5mm or 6mm
probing depths and bleeding upon probing. The dentists
are generally more aggressive with 4mm to 5mm
depths, bleeding upon probing and radiographic calculus,
plus other issues. This opens the door for discussion
of the criteria and why they would be used.
I ask them if radiographic calculus is needed for
periodontal disease to be present. Not necessarily and
this moves the discussion to the goal of reaching a biologically
acceptable root surface and what that means
to each of them. At this point I ask them to review the
AAP Guidelines for Classification, especially the fine
print relating to localized versus generalized and slight,
moderate and severe. Slight being defined as 1mm to
2mm of clinical attachment loss. Going back to the
basics is the key! Ask the team loaded questions like:
- What would you do with a patient that has a
4mm pocket?
- What if the patient was also bleeding?
- What if there was 3mm of recession?
- What if the patient had a Class I furcation
involvement?
- What if the tooth had Class I mobility?
The point is to open up the discussion to the fact
that most hygienists are not consistently documenting
the complete periodontal condition. They will all
say that the tooth requires treatment based only on
probing depth and bleeding.
The big question then is why is there a problem
diagnosing periodontal disease with clear-cut guidelines
to follow. Where is the hygienist getting the idea
that 5mm depths and bleeding are the criteria to be
used? It may, in fact, be the front office staff that have
relayed this based on a particular insurance standard,
not on diagnostic criteria. A mindset of asking “why”
will move the discussion forward and help the dentist
and hygienist come together on a practice philosophy
for treating periodontal disease. We have found that
once the philosophy is established in the practice and
the team understands the “why” and the “how,” getting
the insurance companies to pay is quite simple.
Jamie Marboe, RDH, BS, Inspired Hygiene:
Our consulting firm generally works with offices
with multiple dentists and hygienists. To get the conversation
going, we find it’s good to get all of the doctors
and hygienists to sit down together and have a
discussion regarding the team perio protocol. We want
to create, as a team, a clearly defined hygiene perio protocol.
In order to accomplish this we ask everyone to
come to the meeting with an open mind in an effort to
offer our patients the very best care they deserve.
Explain that there will be no “good cop, bad cop” or
finger pointing during this conversation. It is purely to
uncover some of the obstacles that may be keeping us
from having a solid system in place. We make sure that
the discussion stays safe and that everyone is encouraged
and comfortable with discussing their philosophies,
possible apprehensions and viewpoints openly.
We schedule plenty of time for this initial discussion.
It doesn’t work squeezing it in during lunch or
before work, taking a chance on running late or out of
time. Block out enough time to allow for a thorough
discussion. This process may need several meetings to
create the perio protocol and system.
Key things to be discussed in the initial meeting
include: Where are we now compared to the AAP’s
perio percent? What is working and what is not?
Discuss core philosophies and identify obstacles. Make
a list of these items discussed and find solutions to the
obstacles and what’s not working. Decide why it’s not
working. How do we correct this or do we simply need
to eliminate it? The team needs to agree on what level
of disease to recommend various treatment options.
We emphasize to our teams that they all get to push
the reset button and move forward as a team, helping
each other be accountable with staying on target with
the new perio philosophy.
The Next Step
With the conversation started and the practice
philosophy developing, it’s now time to focus on the
third step, creating the perio program with details for
insurance codes, treatment options, fees, times and
products. Look for this in our next installment in the
July issue.
|