Many Townies have identified “Access to Care” as a
crime. Not being sure what perspective some have
taken to reach this conclusion, I thought that I would
look at it from a few vantage points. I asked myself: Why would
someone consider access to care a crime? Do I consider this a
crime? Why?
In a general sense it might be a crime that in the country
that spends the most on health care and has a deep-rooted commitment
to help fellow human beings, we find ourselves with an
“access” problem.
Though there are a lot of dentists in America, a significant number
of them do not choose to treat poor people, those with dental
insurance, or those with complex medical, mental or intellectual disabilities,
but instead only treat patients who can pay cash and fit
comfortably into their practices. This, in itself, can create an inability
for a large number of those with dental needs to receive
care in a dental office and thus seek services in an emergency room,
community clinic or not seek services at all, contributing to the
“access” issue. It isn’t a crime for dentists to choose this option or a
crime for patients to seek care in other available locations.
Maybe it’s a crime that we do not have a health care system
in place—including real dental insurance—that appropriately
compensates dentists for the care they provide. I believe that if
dentists were fairly reimbursed for the services they provide, and
have simplified administrative procedures to follow from both
the public and private dental insurers, many more dentists
would participate in the various dental insurance plans and publicly
funded programs.
There are critical issues facing many Americans in these difficult
economic times. Specifically, even if someone is motivated to maintain their health and wellness, poverty limits their ability to
follow through on their efforts to be healthy. Additionally, those
in the shrinking middle class are faced with difficult choices such
as paying for dental work, college tuition for children, car repairs
or medications. Many are being squeezed out of the health care
system and have to make these types of choices. Is that criminal?
There is also the situation where an individual may have
dental insurance, transportation, financial means, and a ready,
willing and able dental provider and they still do not access
appropriate dental care. This group makes up 50 percent of the
population. This, to me, is an issue that we have to address if
we hope to get this population to value good oral health and
show up at the dental office.
Many Americans do not value good oral health and see it
as an “elective” procedure, only accessing care when in pain.
This requires educating the American public and non-dental
health providers about the importance of maintaining good
oral health through patient accountability of ongoing preventive
activities. It also includes emphasizing the association
between oral health and overall health. We talk about this a lot
but we, and our professional organizations, have not done an
effective job at convincing the public to value and insist on
receiving quality dental care. We need to develop a meaningful,
effective nationwide marketing campaign—not some
“cutesy” ads—that is focus-group tested and gets serious about
the health issues involved.
I believe that a mobilized, educated public will be the best
ally to “decriminalize” the access issue in the eyes of many
Townies. Raising the percentage of Americans, who show up at
the dental office, even by a few percentage points, would significantly
improve the access numbers. Not doing this might be
the real crime.
|