Implantology is one of the fastest growing segments of dentistry.
There are tremendous numbers of patients who are looking
for and could benefit from implant treatment. General
dentists are poised to benefit by being able to do both the surgical
and restorative phases of treatment. As it stands, roughly
20 percent of general dentists are placing implants - and there's
no reason it shouldn't be 80 percent.
Patients are looking for a single source of dental treatment.
Think about it: If you needed to get your car repaired, would you
want go to one place that fixes your brakes, another that fixes
your muffler and another to do an oil change? Or would you like
to find a place that can do all three of those things well? The
answer is pretty obvious. Your patients are no different. They
would like to go to a dental office that can combine all aspects of
treatment and do it all very nicely using the latest technologies.
As a dentist, wouldn't you like to have the production and the
control that placing your own implant allows?
What's Holding You Back?
What keeps most dentists from placing implants isn't a lack
of education - that's the easy part. We can all take classes. We
can all understand how to do it. Typically there are two things
keeping dentists from placing implants - fear and intimidation.
There is a fear of the procedure itself - hitting a nerve, getting
a less than ideal result, etc. We are very comfortable doing fillings
and root canals, but when it comes to placing an implant
fixture into a bone, suddenly we become very uncomfortable.
Additionally, there is the intimidation of stepping on the toes
of specialists. This is understandable, but at the end of the day
we have to be true to our practice and provide the best care for
our patients.
To combat the fear in my practice, we utilize 3D cone beam
computed tomography (CBCT) technology. By having an inoffice
cone beam scanner, we are able to use Superman-style Xray
vision and see exactly how much bone the patient has, exactly
what size implant we can place, and exactly how to stay away
from vital structures. We can take this virtual planning a step further
and have a surgical guide fabricated, which will then allow
us to very accurately, predictably and safely place that implant
exactly where we planned. We call this a crown-down approach
to implantology – where the restorative outcome dictates
implant placement.
What most general dentists fail to truly understand is CBCT
allows you to pick and choose which cases are right for you! There is no rule that says you have to be able to place every
implant that walks into your office. Additionally, CBCT is not
just for the dentist - it's also for the patient. It's the absolute best
patient education tool, builds patient confidence and increases
case acceptance. Remember, seeing is believing!
An Implant Case Every Clinician Should Be Doing
Let's take a look at a case that represents an extremely common
patient in every general dentist's office. Linda came into
my office originally with a pain on the lower left. Clinically and
on the radiograph, we saw there was a fracture that extended all
the way down the tooth, making it non-restorable (Fig. 1).
We both knew the tooth had to come out and there were
several treatment options. First, we could have taken the tooth
out and left an empty space, which is the least desirable option.
Option number two would be to take the tooth out and give her
a removable appliance, which for a single tooth on a young lady,
is probably not a realistic option (and wasn't in this case).
Option number three would be to do a fixed bridge, which 10-
15 years ago would have probably been the ideal option. But the
ideal option in today's world was option number four: replace it
with a single implant.
For implants, there are two treatment paths. We could do
immediate placement, which is where we place the implant at the
time or very soon after we take the tooth out. Or we can do traditional
placement - take the tooth out, allow the site to fully heal,
and then place the implant. My personal preference is immediate
placement when appropriate. In this case, due to patient uncertainty,
we decided to take the tooth out along with socket preservation
to alleviate pain, and then revisit a few months later to place
the implant.
Fast-forward four months, the patient came back in for an
evaluation and the site has healed very nicely (Fig. 2 and 3), and
we are ready to move forward with the implant procedure. In
my opinion, this should always start with a CBCT and impressions
for proper planning. In my office we utilize Sirona
Galileos CBCT imaging and Sirona CEREC Omnicam for digital
impressions.
The CEREC digital impression is going to serve two purposes.
It's going to allow us to do a virtual wax-up of the missing area (Fig.
4), and it's going to be used to fabricate a precisely fitting surgical
guide. The CEREC data is then integrated with the Galileos CBCT
3D scan to virtual implant planning (Fig. 5). The result is a perfect
implant placement plan that is based on supporting the final restoration (Fig. 6). Everything is brought
full circle and a digital surgical guide (Fig. 7)
is ordered from the combination.
The result is a perfect plan that takes
into account the bone availability, avoids
vital structures, properly and hygienically
supports the final restoration, and produces
a surgical guide to execute the placement
in a safe, predictable, efficient and
minimally invasive procedure. All this in a
single patient visit!
The patient's second visit is for
implant placement utilizing the Nobel
Guided Implant protocol. First, the surgical
guide is verified for full seating and stability
(Fig. 8). The beauty of fully guided
implant surgery is both the osteotomy
(Fig. 9) and the actual implant placement
(Fig. 10) is controlled for depth and angulation.
This ensures a final implant placement
(Fig. 11) that is virtually identical to your implant plan.
And more importantly, in cases where grafting is not necessary
and the presence of adequate keratinized tissue, the implant
placement can be done without raising a flap or even needing
sutures (Fig. 12).
The underlying benefit of all this planning and guided surgery
is the ease of restoration. If we have ideal placement then we
make impressions easier, fabrication easier, delivery easier, and, of
course, the lab bill easier on the bottom line.
Conclusion
We've all had troubles with the economy in the last four or
five years and surviving and thriving in our practices isn't going to
be based on finding more and more new patients, it's going to be
by providing more procedures to our existing patient bases. How
many times have you heard a patient say "Doc, can't you do that
for me?" Stop saying no!
Our goal shouldn't be to provide procedures just for production.
It should be to provide the procedure in a manner without
compromise and to the level of or above a specialist. And technology
can allow you to do that - to properly plan, to choose
which cases are right for you, and to execute the plan. These
technologies make tremendous sense for our patients, for our
practice - and they make dentistry fun!
I encourage general dentists to take a closer look at cone
beam technology and the benefits it can have, and to have an
open mind of what it can do for your practice, for your personal
satisfaction, and most importantly the patient outcomes.
|