Second opinions are common in health care; whether a doctor is sorting out a difficult case or a patient is not sure what to do next. In the context of
our magazine, the first opinion will always belong to the reader. This feature will allow fellow dental professionals to share their opinions on various
topics, providing you with a "Second Opinion." Perhaps some of these observations will change your mind; while others will solidify your position. In
the end, our goal is to create discussion and debate to enrich our profession. – Thomas Giacobbi, DDS, FAGD, Editorial Director, Dentaltown Magazine
Perhaps, you'll recall dental technology products
that had limitations at the time of their introduction.
For example, when digital radiographs first came out,
you couldn't place them in an FMX format, and when
digital impressions first came out, they could only be
worked with a quadrant articulator.
Recently I had a conversation with six of The
Pankey Institute's visiting faculty who are in full-time
practice. I was curious to know in what technologies
they had recently invested and what went through their
minds before and after purchase. Two common concerns
expressed were: would they be making a sound
decision, especially given the slow economy, and would
their choices be in-sync with the latest technology.
Some decisions were driven by need, others by a vision
of higher practice. Each of the investments led to personal
development, more options, and more benefits to
their patients and themselves than anticipated. They all
did research. Some did lengthy anticipatory research,
looking at emerging technology. In every case, they
reported that all product issues were assertively and
promptly addressed by the sales rep and manufacturer.
Dr. Chuck Pitts of LaGrange, Georgia, recently
invested in a Zeiss surgical microscope with 10x the
magnification of the most powerful loupes.
Pitts says,
Only five percent of general dentists use this type of
technology. There is good research and science behind
these optics, which have become the standard of care
for endodontists and are used by many periodontists.
My motivation was to perfect my dentistry. Every time
you step up the magnification, you see more and it is
exciting to do better restorations. Because my team and
associate can watch what I am doing on the screen, it
has become my preferred teaching tool. Screen captures
make it easier for patients to understand the condition
of their mouths and sign on for restorative. I spent a
day with a trainer, and by making a commitment to regularly use the microscope I became proficient over
about four months. Now, I am obsessed with doing
perfect laser surgery on crown margins and even more
exquisite composite work. Although it takes longer to
do everything with the microscope, ultimately the
quality is better. My patients are talking about my
technologically advanced methods and my reputation
has been enhanced within my community.
Dr. Gayle T. Reardon of Sioux Falls, South Dakota,
was clear about why she wanted to go back to school
after 30 years in practice.
Reardon says,
After becoming skilled in the treatment planning, surgical
placement and restoration of dental implants, I
felt the next step was to become uniquely qualified to
assist other dentists in treatment planning difficult
cases. I was anticipating a time in my later years when
I might not be able to handle the ergonomics of intensive
restorative practice but would want to remain professionally
active. So, four years ago, I entered the oral
and maxillofacial radiology program at the University
of Iowa. I earned an MS degree in stomatology and
became board certified in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
Initially, I hoped to have a partner in purchasing
a fully featured CBCT system, but the economic climate
changed midway through my three-year degree
program making an investment of this size difficult.
Rather than owning and operating an imaging center,
I now have a consulting business (Collaborative
Imaging Specialists), as well as my restorative dental
practice. Investing in post-graduate education and software
has presented me with unique opportunities to do
high-quality 3D reconstructions from CBCT files, do
radiographic interpretations, treatment plan and consult
on cases, and assist with surgical guide fabrication
and quality control. Another application is hard-tissue
diagnosis and treatment planning for jaw joints, a keen
interest of mine. Currently, CBCT is transitioning from 'cutting edge' to 'standard of care' in dentistry. 3D volumetric and large-field-of-view images are becoming
part of the standard of care. Next will be virtual
treatment planning. I don't think my learning is nearing
an end. In fact, I'm more excited than ever about
emerging virtual applications for dentistry.
Dr. David Bloom of Salem, New Hampshire,
recently purchased an NV Microlaser from
Discus Dental.
Bloom says,
I spent time doing research into lasers – the cost, payback,
training, etc. I checked out a lot of other lasers before I
decided on the wireless NV. I have been a Discus product
user since 1995, and I know the company has a quality
track record. The NV is helping me do better dentistry for
crown prep and removal of excess tissue. I didn't have to
cut corners somewhere else to afford this technology. I am
still doing all the tried and true procedures I used to, but
it gives me more options when it comes to contouring.
The learning curve for this product is small. My hygienist
and I took an online certification course and a hands on
course brought to our area. Patients are benefitting from her use of the laser to speed up healing of cold sores and for bacterial reduction in pockets.
Dr. Elizabeth Caughey of Atlanta, Georgia, doesn't
view herself as a technology expert, and has always
been cautious about embracing wiz-bang gadgets.
While digital radiography is hardly new, Dr. Caughey
made the shift recently.
She says,
In January of 2011, I started using Dexis digital Xrays.
My patients, team and I all love it. While I was
on maternity leave, my Cavitron failed and I had to
make a quick decision. I was concerned about the
cost and reliability of another dedicated sonic scaler,
so I called my Atlanta Dental Supply rep. Together
we decided to try a new solution. I've always trusted
KaVo technology, and had success with their handpieces;
in fact, the electric handpiece I have been
using for a couple years is a workhorse. The first time
we tried the portable KaVo Prophyflex3, we knew it
was a winner! We can now perform an adult prophy
in any treatment room, which helps in a schedule
pinch! My hygienists love the comfort of the handpiece,
and our patients' teeth look more polished.
Because there was no setup, my supply rep had it in
place immediately, avoiding down time. I have no
regrets about this fast and cost-sensitive decision. My
team and I are actually more efficient and effective.
I am all about win-win when it comes to technology.
Dr. Bradley S. Portenoy of Rockville Centre, New
York, did what he calls a "360 analysis" before making
a recent major investment.
Portenoy says,
I needed a new digital panoramic and weighed the pros
and cons of a 2D or 2D/3D investment. Cost was an
issue but in the end I gravitated toward the newer 3D
technology, which will undoubtedly be the future radiographic
standard. The enhanced 3D images also
allowed me to become a more comprehensive dentist.
After evaluating numerous units and software, I decided
on Gendex DP 700 and the Anatomage imaging software.
Henry Schein support was stellar throughout the
entire process. Now, I can do pans, as well as CBCT
scans, and the unit is the size of a small panoramic. The
small and medium fields of view both reduce radiation
exposure and reduce the need for a medical radiologist
review since I only see the dental and osseous structures
that dentists usually see on radiographs.The 2D/3D unit
has been extremely valuable for me. We routinely take
both digital panoramics and CBCT. These alone pay for
the monthly loan. The real return on investment comes from the excellent implant planning I can now do with
this technology. In fact, with 3D imaging at my ready, I
realized that placing implants could be a reality for me.
I decided to attend Columbia University's Implant
Continuum, and now I place some of my own Nobel
implants. Implant placement will be the real return on
investment for this new technology. The goals for me are
performing optimal care for my patients and setting my
practice apart. This new technology helps me accomplish
both and in a profitable fashion.
Dr. Daren Becker of Atlanta, Georgia, has made
more than one recent technology investment. I asked
him to talk about the Cadent iTero Digital Impression
System he purchased three years ago.
He says,
I clearly felt digital technology was more accurate and
going to become the norm. I did thorough research and
tried E4D and CEREC as well as iTero, but at that time
both the CEREC and E4D came with a milling unit and
I didn't want to manufacture restorations. Digital
impression has made me more effective in getting precise
fit, and delivery appointments are shorter, rarely needing
adjustment. Patients see this as cutting edge. Before digital,
I remember having to retake impressions if a margin
was not clear or distorted. Now, if that happens, I can
simply rescan the area that was missed without having to
redo the entire scan. The iTero software has a way to
measure occlusal clearance so you can be sure there is
enough space for the restoration. I have adopted a technique
of mounting the iTero models on a semi-adjustable
articulator using a traditional face bow and centric relation
bite record. This, along with appropriate equilibration,
has helped the ceramist greatly improve the occlusion
created on restorations. When I have needed service, my
Henry Schein high-tech rep can run diagnostics, installs
replacements and do the calibration for the iTero.
When I started the preceding six conversations, I
have to admit, I was not expecting all happy endings. But there you have it! During my three decades as Chairman
of Education at The Pankey Institute, I was privileged to
observe many successful, comprehensive-care dental
practices. The conversations shared in this article have
affirmed for me that 10 guiding questions are as important
as ever. When considering whether to invest in a
new technology, you will be wise to ask yourself:
- Am I clear about why I am considering this
product?
- What are the science, research and level of testing
behind the product?
- What limitations does the product have, and
can I modify the manufacturer's suggested techniques
to get around these?
- Will the product help me do better dentistry
(effective) or will it make me simply
more efficient?
- Will I have to cut corners to pay for the item?
- Will I have to give up a tried-and-true technique or will I have additional beneficial options?
- Is the manufacturer's customer support stellar
and is product training accessible?
- What has been the manufacturer's track record
with this and/or other products?
- Do I have the time, interest and means to intentionally
develop the associated new skills?
- How will I aid my patients and team in seeing
the benefits and accepting the new technology?
Each of the six dentists said something about his or
her sales rep making a difference. If you are thinking
about buying over the Internet or from a catalog, ask
yourself if you are willing to risk having someone "there
for you" in order to save a few dollars. Reps who carry
out the tradition of being a trusted friend and genuine
advisor can be of enormous assistance in product choice
and support. I am convinced that a trusted rep who
works hard to develop a valued relationship can become
an additional team member.
|