Introduction
Dentists and laboratory ceramists often face complex and timeconsuming
cases that require materials to simultaneously provide
aesthetics and adequate strength. Accurate impressions are of paramount
importance for achieving these goals and require the use of
materials that capture excellent details for every step of the process,
from diagnostic to master impressions.
Virtual impression material, a line of vinyl polysiloxane (VPS)
material, simplifies the impression taking process for IPS e.max
restorations (Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, New York) and expands
the possibilities for conservative, minimally invasive smile design.
Virtual impression material (Ivoclar Vivadent) can be used for fullarch
impressions, eliminating additional steps and saving valuable
chairtime. The fast-set wash materials and putty demonstrate exceptional
adaptation characteristics that withstand the moist oral environment.
The material’s precision and accurate detail reproduction
ensure marginal integrity and remarkably well-fitting restorations.
Case Presentation
A 22-year-old female in excellent oral health came to the
office for a cosmetic consultation with a chief complaint of having
“baby teeth” (Figs. 1 & 2). She exhausted professional whitening
trays, was not satisfied with the results, and requested inoffice
professional whitening treatment. Her shade was a B1, and
she wanted a much whiter and bigger smile to show off from the
field when she cheered for the Jacksonville Jaguars. The patient
had prominent facial features including large eyes, and felt her
small teeth were over-powered by her other more prominent
facial features (Fig. 3).
An initial clinical examination revealed altered passive eruption
of the maxillary anterior teeth and short bicuspids; Class III occlusion,
edge to edge on the left posterior side; minor wear to anterior
tooth #7; and two missing molars, #3 and #19, which had been
bone grafted for the next phase of implant placement. The patient’s
maxillary central length was 8.5mm, and she demonstrated a
reverse incisal curve, wide labial corridor and high smile line of
approximately 2mm, with gingival exposure at full smile over the
centrals. Gingival exposure of 7mm presented in the gingival margin
of the premolars and the inferior border of the upper lip.
After reviewing pre-operative photographs and smile design
principles on a computer with the patient, a treatment plan was
discussed and agreed upon for closed flap osseous crown lengthening of teeth #4-13, followed by placing lithium disilicate (IPS
e.max) veneers. Alternatives to the treatment plan were discussed,
including orthodontics to minimize preparation to the
posterior left side in edge to edge bite, crown lengthening without
porcelain veneers and direct resin veneers.
At the diagnostic appointment, a full series of 12 American
Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD) images were taken, as
well as an upper alginate impression, which was immediately
poured for fabricating a maxillary release appliance. The patient
wore the appliance every night for two weeks to enable the TMJ
to seat into its most anatomically stable position, the muscles to
relax, and an open bite centric relation
record to be taken at the subsequent visit.
An appointment was made for closed flap
osseous crown lengthening, as well as to
obtain open bite centric relation records
and VPS impressions for wax-up, stick
bite and face bow.
At the next appointment, the bite was
recorded and clearance was verified with
articulating paper pulling through the
posterior contact area. Next, the patient
was appropriately anesthetized, the teeth
isolated (Optragate), and bone sounded
on the facials of all maxillary teeth receiving
treatment to gauge the amount of
bone to be removed with the er:YAG
laser. The patient’s smile was digitally
designed prior to performing the gum lift
to anticipate the necessary gingival recontouring.
Immediately following the
crown lengthening procedure, upper and
lower impressions were taken according
to the following procedure.
Pre-operative Impressions Using Virtual
Impression Material
Step 1: A stock tray was lined with Virtual adhesive, and
Virtual putty was mixed and placed in the posterior and seated
in the mouth.
Step 2: The tray was removed immediately to create a pseudo
custom tray in the posterior, after which heavy body was immediately
injected into the tray, and the light body was injected on top
of the heavy body and around the facials of the dentition in the
impressed arch. The tray was restored.
Step 3: The material was allowed to set for 2:30 and
checked for accuracy. The author ensures that the diagnostic
impressions of both arches are extremely accurate, since this is
the first step of the smile design that sets the standard for the
rest of treatment.
Step 4: An earless facebow was lined with Virtual adhesive
and the face bow and stick bite were recorded with Virtual Bite
Registration Material in the photo studio to facilitate laboratory
communication.
The laboratory prescription indicated that the case would be
minimal preparation, and some minimal preparation was anticipated
on the facials of the central incisors. I prefer to place a fine
margin on teeth that require minimal or no preparation for the
ceramist. Teeth #12 and #13 would require preparations that
wrapped over the buccal cusps to enable the ceramist to jump the
edge-to-edge bite, lengthen the incisal edges and normalize the
labial corridor. The maxillary canines
would require some lingual wrap to control
occlusion and provide immediate
canine disclusion.
Discussion with the laboratory
involved tooth shapes and sizes, as well as
final length and other smile design principles.
The laboratory was also instructed to
mount the case using the enclosed centric
relation open record bite and equilibrate
interferences to full closure and wax in the
new MIP. The laboratory would produce a
reduction guide based on the wax-up for
use during the preparation appointment.
Tooth Preparation
At the preparation appointment, the
patient was anesthetized. Small adjustments
were made to posterior inclines
recorded on the CR open bite mounted
models from the equilibrated models on
a semi-adjustable articulator. Utilizing
reduction guides fabricated off the laboratory wax-up, proper
reduction and ideal room for the IPS e.max minimal preparation
veneers was verified (Fig. 4). Once the reduction guide cleared the
facials of the teeth, there was enough room to fabricate the intraoral
mock-up from the Siltec impression of the wax-up.
The Siltec impression of the wax-up was filled with a temporary
crown and bridge material and seated in the mouth to
fabricate a mock-up. After allowing the provisional material to
set for two minutes, the matrix was removed, and the bulk flash
was cleaned. Aesthetics of the mock-up were reviewed prior to
preparation and determined to look excellent.
The mock-up was prepped with .3mm reduction in three
facial plains, and 1.5mm on incisal reduction to allow room
for the laboratory to cut back and layer the incisal edges (Fig. 5).
The mock-up was prepped as if it was actual enamel and, once
completed, excess flash was removed and shallow chamfer margins
were placed equi-gingival. The author prefers to create a slight margin, enough for the ceramist to delineate as a finish
line for the restorations (Fig. 6).
Bite Record and Final Impressions Using Virtual
Impression Materials
Step 1: The bite was checked and recorded with Virtual bite,
and photographs were taken to record preparation shade ND1
with Ivoclar Vivadent ND shade guide.
Step 2: With a custom tray lined with Virtual adhesive, a
maxillary impression was taken using fast set Virtual Heavy Body
and Virtual Light Body material. No retraction cord or materials
were used prior to impressing the case.
Step 3: After the impression was checked for final set, it was
removed and carefully scrutinized for marginal details that are
crucial for excellent fitting restorations.
Step 4: The impression was disinfected with CaviCide surface
disinfectant spray and packed for shipment to the laboratory
(Figs. 13 and 14).
Provisionalization
The teeth were provisionalized with a bleach-shaded temporary
crown and bridge material. The final shade of the temporaries
material on an ND1 prepared tooth approximates a Chromoscope
020/030 shade. The teeth were conditioned with Concepsis
(Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, Utah), then spot etched
in the center of the teeth, which enhances the strength of the
provisional material. The etch was rinsed and the teeth dried and
coated with a desensitizer (Telio CS Desensitizer, Ivoclar
Vivadent). A primer was then placed on the preparations with a
microtip brush and air dried with an Adec Warm Air Tooth Dryer.
The Siltec matrix of the wax-up was filled with a provisional
material and seated in the mouth for two minutes. After setting,
the matrix was removed and excess flash was cleaned with a
sharp instrument. After final setting, the provisional material
was trimmed to margins with an eight-fluted carbide flame
on the facial and a football-shaped eight-fluted carbide on
the lingual. The margins were polished, the incisal edges were rounded, and the incisal embrasures deepened to produce a
more youthful smile. The incisal embrasures were opened with
a small diamond disk, and the mesial and distal line angles were
modified with an eight-fluted-carbide-flame-shaped bur. These
areas was further polished, and the provisional then glazed. The
provisional was cured with an LED curing light (Bluephase
Style, Ivoclar Vivadent) for 10 seconds per tooth.
Laboratory Fabrication
The laboratory poured the impression in stone and created
a working model of the IPS e.max veneers (Fig. 15). Each veneer
was carefully inspected for exceptional aesthetics while preparing
the case (Fig. 16). The details of the impression facilitated laboratory
fabrication of exceptionally well-fitting restorations (Figs.
17 and 18).
Final Cementation
At the cementation appointment, the provisional (Fig.19)
was removed. The IPS e.max veneers were carefully evaluated for
aesthetics and fit (Fig. 20).The preparations were cleaned with
chlorohexadine, and the IPS e.max restorations were tried in one
at a time for fit, then two at a time for contacts. Once full seating
was confirmed, all veneers were tried on together with try-in
paste Variolink Veneer HV+1 shade, Ivoclar Vivadent) (Fig. 21).
The veneers were removed and prepared for adhesive bonding
using Variolink veneer light-cured cement, then bonded
using the “tack and wave” method. Excess cement was cleaned,
the margins were covered with a glycerin gel, and the restorations
given a final 40-second cure per surface. The occlusion
was adjusted in protrusive and lateral protrusive and confirmed
to have immediate canine disclusion.
Conclusion
Using Virtual impression material facilitates laboratory communication
and also the fabrication of exceptionally well fitting
lithium-disilicate restorations, such as minimal preparation IPS
e.max veneers. The Virtual line of VPS impression materials
ensures accurate impressions throughout the restorative process,
from diagnostic to master impressions.
|