I’m turning 50 this year, and one of the many
things that still amuses me after living a half century
on this planet is how a person’s thoughts and
ideas evolve – sometimes progressing as we learn
new information, other times reverting to old
ways of thinking. And it is just as interesting to
see how certain points of view change over time.
In my first business class at Creighton University
in 1980, I learned the return on stocks was about
12.5 percent on average, bonds were about a
seven percent return and the ultra-conservative,
risk-free government bonds gave you about a five
percent return. And if you told me back then
that 30 years later bonds would have outperformed
stocks, I wouldn’t have believed you. Yet
here we are!
While I was in dental school in the ’80s, up to
that point in my life I’d never had a cavity. One
day, one of my classmates, Dr. Paul O’Malley –
who is now, in my opinion, one of the best dentists
in Texas – did an exam on me and found eight
sticky occlusals on my molars. He did eight amalgam
fillings on me the very next day.
Then in 1987, when I graduated from dental
school, I got caught up in the cosmetic revolution.
All of these “gurus” were running around telling
anyone who’d listen, “Amalgam expands much
more than composite, and that’s why they break
all the teeth away. Patients don’t want black
metal in their mouths anymore. This
new composite material is going to
bond the walls together and the tooth
will be much stronger than if you
used amalgam. Besides, amalgam has
mercury and other poison in it.” I
was young, got caught up in all the
excitement and bought into everything
they told me. God knows the
patients wanted white fillings. I
wanted to believe this beautiful,
white filling was so
much better than this
black, metallic, ugly
filling. Everyone
wanted to believe
it – especially me. A decade ago, I even went so far
as to get all eight of my amalgam fillings replaced
with pretty composite ones.
I don’t have too many regrets in the last 50
years, but replacing those amalgam fillings with
composite fillings is one of them. Every single one
of those composites is now a gold inlay or onlay.
When those composite fillings failed one by one, I
got tired of screwing around with it. I went all
gold. If I want something to last the longest, I’ll go
gold. But your patients can’t afford gold every time
(or ever, in some cases). They’re also tired of coming
back to your practice every 10 years or so to get
the same tooth fixed and refilled with composite,
since you don’t offer amalgam anymore.
It’s time we stopped fooling ourselves. Yes,
everyone will continue to ask for composite because
it looks good, but it’s time to start informing your
patients about the risks and rewards of using a particular filling material. Because aesthetics is valued
as much if not more than functionality, if you give
a woman the choice between a white composite filling
or a dark metallic filling that will last much
longer than the white one, she will still choose the
white filling 80 to 90 percent of the time. But if it’s
a young man who’s starting a family, is extremely
busy, barely comes in for scheduled appointments
as is, and doesn’t want to keep coming back to get
a new filling every 10 years, he might choose the
amalgam. And me? Well, I’m a short, fat, bald guy,
who, at 50 years old isn’t interested in doing anything
cosmetically. This is as good as I’m going to
look, gang! I’ll take amalgam any day (in fact I just
did... Take a look at the the before-and-after photos
on page 18. That’s me last month, baby)!
I’ve had enough of this all-or-nothing, extremist
view on dentistry. Are you telling me you can’t
place one amalgam in your office? You really think
you’re a doctor of dental surgery placing only composite?
There are seven billion people on the planet
and you don’t see an indication for amalgam in
your office? Let’s look at your own six-year-old boy
who has an occlusal cavity. Why would you put a
tooth-colored filling in there? Is it in the cosmetic
zone? Who the hell is going to see it?
The fastest growing segment of the U.S. population
is women 100 and older; the second fastest
is women 90 to 100. Women are living longer, and
coming with it is arthritis, dementia and medications
that all but shut down their saliva production.
They start getting plagued with root surface decay.
So you are going to put in a completely inert composite
restoration instead of an amalgam or a glass
ionomer? Really? News flash: you can’t call yourself
a doctor anymore – you’re an extremist! If you don’t
have amalgam in your office – an option that is
cheaper, easier, faster and typically lasts longer than
composite – then, my friend, you’re an extremist.
You can’t call yourself a doctor. You can’t call yourself
a scientist. And you think you can call yourself
a cosmetic dentist? What, on an 80-year-old lady
with Alzheimer’s? Really?
It’s time we take a closer look at amalgam and
start offering our patients a choice instead of forcing
the cosmetic option down their throats. It’s
time the debate took a fact-based turn for the better
– for all sides!
This is a very special issue of Dentaltown
Magazine. My editorial team and I are proud to
present the close-to-definitive Point-Counterpoint
debate on amalgam, composite and glass ionomer
(see page 82). This process started when I met Dr.
Michael Wahl – probably the dental profession’s
foremost expert on amalgam. He said he wanted to
put a little article together for our readers, which
piqued my interest because I had been looking into
more information on amalgam at the time. It was
kismet, I tell you! There are very few dentists alive
today who have done as much research on amalgam
as Dr. Wahl, and we are very pleased that he
wrote an amazing article for this issue. Dr. Wahl’s
first draft was so large, it took him months to pare
it down to its most essential points – and it’s still a
beast! We also invited two of dentistry’s most outspoken
professionals, Drs. David Clark and Lee
Ann Brady to present the composite side of this
important debate, because there are still some of
you out there who have never joined the 21st century
and placed composite. And we asked Dr.
Umar Haque to discuss the oft overlooked glass
ionomer angle. There are indications for all of these
materials! It’s time to forego this all-or-nothing
crap! It was our team’s goal to be fair, present all
sides of the debate and then allow you to make up
your own mind and join in on the discussion on
the message boards of Dentaltown.com.
|