How a strategically designed retirement plan can increase
your opportunities for a comfortable retirement.
by Tom Zgainer
While establishing a retirement plan for your company can
provide a number of near and long-term benefits, it is wise to
look at a number of factors to determine the plan that best suits
your personal and corporate objectives. Oftentimes an employer
implements a plan without considering that the employer might
subject itself to unintended costs and liabilities. Retirement
plans have specific requirements related to factors such as eligibility,
employer contributions, vesting and compliance tests
among many others. All these items should be part of a consultative
discussion you have with the plan providers you are considering
working with.
The initial question, however, is why do you want to set up
a plan in the first place? Is it primarily to accelerate your personal
retirement planning, or is it to provide an additional benefit
to staff in order to attract and retain employees to help build
a profitable practice, or is it some combination of these reasons?
While that might sound like a simple question, it can have a
number of related answers. Getting to understand the various
types of retirement plan options available to you will help guide
you to the best type of plan for you, and the underlying design
of the plan itself. SIMPLEs (Savings Incentive Match Plan for
Employees of Small Employers), SEPs (Simplified Employee
Pension Plans), 401(k) profit sharing plans, Defined Benefit and
Cash Balance plans all have their place. And what might sound
like the best fit for you today might not be a good fit in the
future as your personal objectives and employee make-up
change over time.
It is also important to be cognizant that setting up a retirement
plan gives you some additional roles like plan fiduciary and
trustee, along with new fee disclosure rules beginning next April
that you need to understand. Spending some time to learn more
about the points covered here will go a long way to helping you
establish a successful retirement plan for you and your employees.
Comparing and Understanding Plan Types
Understanding which plan best fits your current personal
and corporate objectives is important.
If you have a 401(k), Profit Sharing, SIMPLE or SEP retirement
plan, this is a great time of year to review your plan to be
sure that what you have in place today is what you will need in
for the rest of this year and beyond. SIMPLE 401(k) plans are
great when first starting out, but oftentimes business owners feel
constrained by their lower contribution limits as compared to a
401(k), so now is the time to see if an alternative retirement plan
might be part of your strategy going forward.
With a SIMPLE, due to a provision called the Exclusive Plan
Rule, you can switch to a 401(k) plan only in January of the following
year, so you’ll want to be sure you are not limiting your contribution
goals with the reduced limits within a SIMPLE as
compared to a 401(k). Also, the 2012 deferral limits for a SIMPLE
are $11,000 compared to $17,000 for a 401(k), a significant difference
over time. With SEPs, oftentimes during the course of a
year, employees become eligible for the same employer contribution
percentage you might be paying yourself. This can become
quite cost prohibitive for you. If you have a SEP, be sure to confirm
with your provider/advisor/CPA as soon as possible what your
contribution obligations will be to avoid any unpleasant surprises.
New Comparability Profit Sharing Plans
Business owners often ask how they can skew retirement
plan benefits to themselves or to their key employees. The
Internal Revenue Code restricts the ability of a sponsor of a taxqualified
retirement plan to do so: a plan will not be tax-qualified
if it discriminates in favor of a “highly compensated”
employees (HCE). In general, such an employee is either greater
than a five percent owner of the employer or an employee that
earned more than $115,000 in the prior plan year.
A way for business owners to maximize the defined contribution
benefits for them and their key employees is through the
use of a “new comparability” contribution formula to help satisfy
the onerous non-discrimination and top-heavy requirements
of the Internal Revenue Code.
With respect to employer contributions to a defined contribution
retirement plan, the “anti-discrimination” rule generally
means that if an employer provides a contribution to a plan on
behalf of an HCE as a certain percentage of the HCE’s compensation,
the employer must provide a contribution to the plan on
behalf of a non-HCE in the same percentage of compensation.
This is known as a “pro rata allocation.”
Some exceptions to this rule exist, such as the doctrines of
“integration” and “new comparability” (also known as “superintegration”
or “tiered allocation”). The contribution doctrine of
integration means that an employer must make disproportionately
greater Social Security contributions on behalf of lower
paid employees than on behalf of higher paid employees. Since
Social Security is a type of retirement plan, the code permits an
employer to offset the payment of greater Social Security contributions
for lower-paid employees by allowing the employer to
provide a disproportionately greater share of contributions to a
retirement plan on behalf of higher compensated employees. If
a plan is integrated, the employer need not provide a strict pro
rata allocation contribution.
With regard to the doctrine of new comparability, discrimination
is examined on a “benefits” (as opposed to “contributions”)
basis. Contribution amounts for all recipients are
converted to a benefit at age 65. A benefit accrual rate for each
is then determined and tested to ensure that it is not discriminatory.
Since the select employees are often the business
owner(s) and are usually older employees, they have less time to
reach retirement age than do younger employees. An older
employee needs to receive a disproportionately greater share of
contributions than would a younger employee in order to
receive an equal benefit at retirement age. That is why the select
employees may receive a disproportionately greater share of contributions
under this doctrine, the plan can be determined to be
non-discriminatory and the tax-qualification rules of the code
will be satisfied.
New comparability will often be more beneficial to the
employer than integrated plans. This is because a new comparability
plan provides a maximum benefit for the HCE’s or
select employee group, while providing the lowest possible contribution
for the non-HCE’s on non-key group allowed by law.
Finally, it is often advantageous from an employer’s perspective
that the exceptions to the pro rata allocation formula can be
used in a discretionary profit-sharing plan. This is because such
a plan does not require that contributions be made to it year
after year. Thus, if an employer has a poor year economically,
the employer need not make a contribution to the plan unless
it is top heavy.
Defined Benefit and Cash Balance Plans
High net-worth individuals have a constant need to maximize
the bottom line. One effective way to accomplish this goal is to
generate higher tax deductions by accelerating contributions. It’s
important to not overlook the role that a properly designed retirement
plan can play in helping you shield more of your income
from the tax collector while increasing your retirement savings.
Defined Benefit and Cash Balance enable successful business
owners to keep more of their income while providing an
improved retirement benefit. For the sole proprietor who
requires a higher tax deduction than the 25 percent/$49,000/
$54,500 found in a defined contribution plan, installing a traditional
defined benefit plan can produce significant contribution
and tax benefits.
A defined benefit plan promises a specified monthly benefit
at retirement for life. The plan might state this promised benefit
as an exact dollar amount, such as $100 per month at retirement.
The annual benefit is defined as an accrual of a monthly
benefit payable at retirement age, based on current and/or past
compensation history. The maximum benefit is based on an
annual benefit payable every year for life starting at age 62. That
maximum is currently $195,000 (indexed).
The maximum contributions depend on the age and compensation
of an individual with annual contributions for one
individual as high as $200,000. The older the individual, the
younger the assumed retirement age, the higher the potential
limit. The ultimate benefit is totally dictated by plan terms with
the employer responsible for all investment returns.
The maximum benefit limit of $195,000 at age 62 has an
equivalent lump sum value of more than $2.4 million. A sole
proprietor earning $500,000 at age 60 with a 25 percent SEP
plan probably requires a higher tax deduction than the $49,000
with a defined contribution plan. Installing a traditional defined
benefit plan can mean a new contribution of $200,000 that
might more closely meet the needs of that individual.
Cash Balance Plans
For the owner of a successful company with two or more
employees, a Cash Balance plan can allow the owner to pay less
in overall pension benefits to the rank and file, while increasing
their own retirement savings and obtaining a higher tax deduction.
Cash Balance plans have several attractive features for small
businesses. Contribution limits can be much higher than a
defined contribution plan, the benefits formula for owners can
be substantially higher than for non-owners (but only if nondiscrimination
testing is satisfied), and the owner can maximize
discrimination and dollars by pairing a Cash Balance plan with
a 401(k) profit sharing plan.
A Cash Balance plan is a defined benefit retirement plan
with an unusual contribution feature. It is used in cases where
the owner wishes to benefit key employees and where the owner
desires to have deductible contributions in an amount greater
than the maximum contributions that can be made on behalf of
a participant in a defined contribution plan (currently an annual
$50,000 or $55,500 for an individual over 50).
Although a Cash Balance plan is classified as a defined benefit
plan, it resembles a defined contribution plan from the perspective
of a participant. In this regard, although the assets are commingled
to provide benefits to all participants, a hypothetical account is
maintained for each participant, the plan sponsor makes annual
contributions, and interest is credited to each account.
The fictional contribution to the account
is either a percentage of a participant’s
compensation or is a flat dollar amount. The
interest credited is either a fixed rate (e.g.,
five percent) or tied to an index (e.g., the 30-
year Treasury bond rate). Since a Cash
Balance plan is a defined benefit plan, its
benefits are based on the plan’s benefits formula
as opposed to the actual investment
earnings on plan assets. In addition, actual
investment earnings of the plan assets do not affect the amount of
balances in plan accounts. That’s why the plan sponsor, not participants,
bears the investment risk.
At a minimum, it might be worth your time to see how each
type of retirement plan might fit your own personal and business
objectives. An experienced third-party administrator or
actuary can gather your census information and run a number
of illustrations to show you the various advantages and disadvantages
which are a function of the amount of contributions
you wish to make, and your employee demographics. Doing so
will go a long way in helping you increase the odds that you will
have a comfortable retirement to reward you for your years of
active practice.
Author Bio |
Tom Zgainer is Sr. Vice President of Sales and Business Development for ExpertPlan,
Inc. He has helped more than 2,300 small businesses establish a new or improved
retirement plan over the past decade. Much of his focus has been on strategic plan
designs for dentists, doctors and anesthesiologists. ExpertPlan, www.expertplan.com, is one of
the country’s largest independent retirement plan providers, with more than 18,000 clients. Mr.
Zgainer can be reached at tzgainer@expertplan.com.
|
|