
A very close inspection of dental enamel reveals its intricate fabric. Having to
reproduce these fine structures and shade nuances seems a daunting task. Due to
the research and development efforts of dental composite manufacturers over the
past few years, materials are now available to facilitate the placement of restorations.
Nevertheless, the appearance of composite resin restorations is often marred by a
grayish shimmer. The following clinical case shows a way to avoid this problem and
realize the natural-looking results envisioned by the patient.
An 11-year-old male patient presented for surgery with a fractured central incisor
(Fig. 1). The clinical examination revealed that the tooth was sensitive to temperature
and percussion. A fracture close to the pulp was diagnosed (Fig. 2).
Clinical evidence of a periodontal trauma was not found. I recommended the tooth
be reconstructed by layering composite resin using a minimally invasive and conservative
restorative technique.
Shade Selection
I determined the shade in daylight at the beginning of the treatment before
the teeth were dried. I used the shade guide of the composite resin, which I subsequently
used during the restorative procedure (Tetric EvoCeram). In order to
check the selected tooth color, I applied a composite layer to a tooth and polymerized
it. For the cervical area, I chose dentin shade A2 and for the incisal area
enamel A1.
The Mock-Up
The treatment area was locally anaesthetized and the tooth was reconstructed
free-handedly using a composite resin (deviating from the tooth color), without
preparation or the application of an adhesive. I decided to use an easily recognizable
shade; in this case A4 (Fig. 3). After polymerization, the shape and exact position
of the margin and the occlusion were refined. Finally, a silicone matrix of the
palatal surface and the margin was fabricated with a putty impression material.
This matrix would facilitate the subsequent layering procedure. After the fabrication
of the silicone matrix, the provisional restoration (mock-up) was removed.
Later a composite resin in the desired tooth color would be placed.
The Cementation Protocol
When the adhesive was applied on the restoration, it was important to ensure
that the tooth surface was not too wet. The placement of a rubber dam with ligatures
is standard procedure. The rubber dam provides an unobstructed view of
the treatment field and increases the safety and comfort of the practitioner and
the patient.
The tooth substance was prepared with a featheredge in the labial enamel. This
preparation design ensures tight sealing and forms the basis for an unobtrusive
transition between the natural tooth structure and the composite resin (Fig. 4).
The enamel and dentin were cleaned with a mixture of pumice and pure chlorhexidine
(Paroex) at 0.2 percent. Next, Telio CS Desensitizer was applied.
Due to the wide enamel edge, the total-etch technique was used. That is, the
tooth was etched with phosphoric acid before the adhesive was applied. Therefore,
the enamel was etched for 30 seconds and the dentin for 15 seconds with total
etch. This etching gel contains 37 percent phosphoric acid. The surfaces were
rinsed for 20 seconds and then carefully dried according to the "wet-bonding"
principle (adhesion on moist surfaces). As a result, the enamel was dry, while the dentin remained somewhat moist. This drying step requires utmost care when this
type of adhesive is used. If the moisture content within the dentin tubules is too
high or if the collagen fibers collapse due to excessive drying, the penetration of
the adhesive, and therefore the bond strength, is reduced.
The single-component adhesive ExciTE was applied to the enamel and dentin
and allowed to react for 10 seconds. An indirect stream of air was used to evaporate
the solvent contained in the adhesive. In the process, the air spray was applied
on a mirror in the mouth, which was held at an angle to the prepared tooth surface.
As soon as the surface was lustrous, the adhesive was further polymerized for
10 seconds (low power mode of the bluephase G2 LED curing light).
Layering of the Composite Resin
First, the composite resin was applied to the palatal areas. The enamel material
A1 was applied in the silicone matrix. In order to avoid the formation of
bubbles, the composite resin was distributed very carefully. The matrix was
placed in the patient's mouth and positioned on the palatal surface with light
pressure. The composite resin was polymerized for 15 seconds using the soft
start mode (Fig. 5). Small lobes of dentin material (A2) were subsequently
applied. The position of these lobes was individually determined. The aesthetic
results were based on the contralateral teeth, which served as a comparison. In
this case, the mamelons were clearly separated. They ended below the incisal
edge (Fig. 6). By observing the existing anatomical features, a natural-looking
and aesthetic outcome was achieved.
The composite resin was applied in small amounts, which were periodically
cured with a bluephase curing light in the soft start mode. The dentin material was
applied and light-cured. Next, the incisal edge of the tooth, that is, the outermost
part of the restoration, was reconstructed. Small portions of the translucent incisal
material were placed between the dentin mamelons. A probe came in useful in
these narrow areas. Finally, the entire labial surface was coated with Tetric
EvoCeram Bleach 1, making sure both the dentin lobes and the incisal edge were
completely covered. The bleach shade made the tooth appear lighter. The dentin
material imparted the composite resin restoration with a tooth-like appearance.
The shade was responsible for the tooth's natural-looking brightness.
Surface Finishing
The aesthetic outcome is largely based on the successful re-creation of the surface
texture. The imitation of the shape and surface details is just as important as
that of the fine color nuances. In the treatment of a child's tooth in particular, it is
important to take the micro- and macro-anatomical structure into consideration.
The surface was finished with finishing diamonds (first red, then yellow). Spray was
not used. Work was done using a surgical microscope. The restoration was finally
polished with the Astropol system (using water spray). In contrast to polishing
discs, these rubber tips do not harm the surface structure.
Conclusion
The fabrication of natural-looking, highly aesthetic restorations is a rewarding
task with Tetric EvoCeram materials and the increment technique. The bleach
shade on the tooth surface brightens the restoration. This approach is extremely
helpful in the restoration of children's teeth. With the help of this adhesive technique,
teeth can be restored in a minimally invasive way (Figs. 7a, b).
 Fig. 1: Pre-operative view: fractured central incisor
 Fig. 2: Considerable loss of dental enamel; fracture
line near the pulp
 Fig. 3: Mock-up made of composite resin (A4) for the
palatal silicone matrix
 Fig. 4: Preparation of a featheredge under rubber dam
isolation
 Fig. 5: Build-up of the palatal surface with enamel
material (A1). The precision of the morphology is
already impressive at this stage.
 Fig. 6: Lobes are created with dentin material (A2).
The translucent material is placed between these
mamelons.
 Figs. 7a, b: A comparison: before and after: The shade
on the surface of the restoration imparts the tooth with
the necessary brightness.
|