
What we can learn from the marketing of bottled water
by Trisha E. O’Hehir, RDH, MS
What's colorless, tasteless and smells like money?
The answer – according to an article by Shankar
Vedantam in the Washington Post, June 30, 2008 – water! Think about it. Americans spend $60 billion each year on
bottled water, when tap water costs only pennies.
Hundreds of companies are now selling bottled water to
Americans in a country with the science and technology to provide
safe, great tasting water to the entire population at very little
cost to the consumer. Our water purification technology
rivals the discoveries needed to take astronauts to the moon!
However, the bottled water industry is successfully using marketing
to convince Americans there is a substantial difference
between what's in the bottle and what comes out of the tap.
Consumers are willing to pay markups of 1,000 to 10,000 times
the cost of tap water. This is marketing magic!
On the other hand, efforts by the dental profession to convince
Americans to prevent dental disease just aren't working.
In 2000, the U.S. Surgeon General released a report on oral
health in America calling dental disease the "silent epidemic."
Estimates vary, depending on criteria used, but it is fair
to say that at least 80 percent of our population will experience
dental disease to some extent during their lifetime from caries to
gingivitis.1,2 Caries and periodontal disease are preventable, but
getting that message to consumers is nearly impossible and getting
them to take appropriate action rarely happens. The complex
cases presented on Dentaltown and Hygienetown are a
testament to the enormity of the problem. We don't see message
boards complaining about too little disease as many lament the
fact that people with serious dental problems are not willing to
spend the money needed to treat the disease.
Despite the many benefits of preventing dental disease, consumers
aren't buying that message. In fact, most don't even
believe dental disease is preventable, they think tooth decay and
gum disease are inevitable, no matter what their socioeconomic
status. Just ask your patients, "Is dental disease preventable or
inevitable?" The answers will surprise you. While flying from
Dallas to Boston I chatted with the man sitting next to me prior
to take off. He was a 40-year-old banker, married to an attorney
with a seven-year-old son and a baby on the way. He and his
wife were doing well financially, highly educated, and yet did
not know that dental disease was preventable. We talked about
his son and as a hygienist, I couldn't resist asking if his child had
any cavities. The father's answer saddened me, as he replied, "He
doesn't have any cavities yet." Yet? I questioned, wondering why he anticipates his young son will eventually have tooth decay.
His reply "I have fillings and so does my wife, so it's just natural
that he'll have them too." That's the message being marketed to
consumers – dental disease is inevitable and the damage can be
repaired. Adding insult to injury, consumers feel that someone
else should pay for their dental care, not them.
How can bottled water companies convince Americans to
buy water in a bottle when they have perfectly good tap water
and yet the dental and dental hygiene professions can't convince
people to do just a few inexpensive things each day that will save
them money, prevent pain and avoid an ugly smile? The answer
is marketing! A comparison of bottled water marketing and oral
health marketing reveals significant differences that explain
water's success, and our lack thereof.
Bottled Water
How It's Marketed: There are currently more than 1,000
brands of bottled water selling from 69 cents to thousands of dollars
a bottle. Grocery store brands, which may in fact be just tap
water, are sold for less than a dollar, while BlingH20 sells
Swarovski crystal-studded bottles for more than a million times
the price of tap water. Since tap water is the primary competitor
for bottled water, selling water itself is difficult. They need to convince
consumers that bottled water is safer, cleaner and better tasting
than tap water. Look closely at the marketing for bottled
water. They are selling emotion, not water. They are selling how
you will "feel" when you drink this water, rather than the water
itself. You'll feel safer and feel healthier drinking their water.
Why It's Successful: People first purchased bottle water to
be "chic" and then marketing went from fashion to fear of tap
water quality. Successful marketing triggers emotions. People
respond emotionally, not logically when they purchase.
Logically you'd drink tap water, based on cost, safety and taste.
But people buy bottled water to feel safer than if they drank tap
water (not true, but emotion nonetheless). They buy bottled
water to feel healthier, to enjoy the taste more than tap water
(proven in blind taste tests to be indistinguishable from tap
water). They buy bottled water to feel chic and fashionable.
Success comes from marketing emotions associated with
drinking bottled water and not the water itself. This level of successful
marketing makes selling snow to Eskimos seem like a reasonable
proposition.
What Harm it Causes: The harm comes on several levels,
from pollution to undermining the nation's public water infrastructure.
High levels of carbon dioxide are emitted into the
atmosphere to produce and transport bottled water across the
globe, when in fact the water here is cheaper and might even be
safer, plus millions of plastic bottles now need to be disposed of in landfills. The pH of bottled water is lower, in many cases,
than tap water and additional filtration might take out valuable
minerals and also remove fluoride.
Much of the bottled water purchased in this country is in
fact, tap water. Some brands feature mountain peaks and
waterfalls and the word "pure" when in fact the bottle contains
tap water put through additional filtration and purification to
make already clean water clean! Marketing that bottled water
is "safer" than tap water undermines confidence in public
drinking water. This thinking reduces support for repairs and
upgrades to the nation's public water infrastructure.
Oral Health
How Its Marketed: Oral health is marketed as a medical
issue, linked in some cases, to overall systemic health.
Marketing is based on logic and scientific evidence. People are
told what they should do, what they need to do, why they
should do it, how to treat disease, how to repair the damage
from dental disease and how to prevent future disease. This
type of marketing doesn't rely on emotion, but rather on efforts
to gain "compliance." Motivational interviewing focuses on listening
to what patients want and what they are willing to do to
prevent dental disease. This approach creates a foundation of
trust to build a plan of action to achieve the necessary actions
to prevent disease. This is a logical approach, but this is not
successful marketing. Successful marketing is linked to emotion
rather than logic, to feelings rather than science.
Why It's Not Successful: What consumers pay for oral
health falls into the "discretionary" category of purchases, just
as bottled water does. The primary competition for oral health
expenditures are things people purchase for fun, leisure and
travel like electronics, cars, vacations, hair and nail salon visits,
eating out, bottled water and Starbucks coffee, to name a few.
These are emotional purchases, not logical purchases. Logic is
used later to justify the emotional decision to buy. Positive
emotions like confidence, self-esteem, belonging, pride,
power, safety and enjoyment trigger purchases.
Unintentional marketing of the dental message happens in
movies where negative emotions are associated with dental visits.
Rarely is a dentist or dental hygienist portrayed as providing
services that make you feel safer and healthier. Rather, the
emotions triggered are extreme fear, pain and discomfort. Add
to this the feeling of paying for these services is adding insult
to injury.
One aspect of dentistry – cosmetic and aesthetic dentistry – has experienced successful marketing because it markets to
the emotions. Pictures of bright, white, straight teeth paint a
picture of confidence, fun and enjoyment. There's no logic
here; no link to the science of oral health, yet people are willing
to buy cosmetic dentistry more readily than prevention or
treatment of disease.
What Harm it Causes: Marketing oral health using logic
rather than emotion falls flat. We already know that marketing
the importance of flossing to prevent dental disease doesn't
work. We've been preaching that for decades and the research
shows that more than 85 percent of the population doesn't
floss daily and those who do are not necessarily effective at
removing biofilm.³ The only reason we continue to market this
way is tradition.
Marketing toothbrushing as the primary means of plaque
removal also masks the fact that most dental disease begins
between the teeth, not on the facial and lingual surfaces.
Toothpaste companies have marketed the feeling of clean teeth
using their products, when in fact most people brush for only
30 seconds and do not remove adequate plaque to prevent
dental disease. Good use of an emotion to sell a product, but
this isn't marketing prevention of dental disease; it's marketing
a clean feeling from toothpaste.
Marketing oral health as part of the medical model doesn't
tap into an emotion, therefore the desired action isn't taken. If
providing information and logic worked to market health, no
one would smoke and no one would be overweight. The emotional
marketing of smoking cigarettes to be chic, macho or
sophisticated and the marketing of convenience foods to
reward yourself and enjoy life with the time you saved have
worked against health.
Conclusion
Appealing to consumers' emotions rather than logic makes
the difference. These emotions can be used to market oral
health, with the science and logic used later to support the
emotional decision. Research published several years ago by
the Assistant Surgeon General of the United States Army
Dental Corps General Bernier showed that military recruits
bought into basic oral hygiene, not with brochures, scientific
lectures or demonstration, but when oral hygiene was linked
to kissability. The old adage "sex sells" might be something to
consider when marketing oral health. Fresh breath sells not
because it's a sign of good health, but because people with
fresh breath feel confident and it boosts their self-esteem.
Marketing to the emotions rather than with logic is a challenge
for our science-based profession, yet the scientific research in
the marketing field confirms people make choices first from
their emotions, and then support that decision with logic.
Link oral health to feelings of confidence, security and the
enjoyment of life rather than to the avoidance of future painful
disease. A beautiful smile lasts a lifetime.
References:
1. Axelsson, P.: Diagnosis and Risk Prediction of Periodontal Diseases. Quintessence Publishing, 2002.
2. Axelsson, P.: Diagnosis and Risk Prediction of Dental Caries, Quintessence Publishing, 2000.
3. Carter-Hanson, C., Gadbury-Amyot, C. and Killoy, W.: Comparison of the Plaque Removal Efficacy
of a New Flossing Aid (Quik Floss) to Finger Flossing. J Clin Perio 23: 873–878, 1996. |