Perio
Reports Vol. 23 No. 7
Perio Reports provides easy-to-read research summaries on topics of specific interest to clinicians. Perio Reports research summaries will be included in each issue to keep you on the cutting edge of dental hygiene science.
|
Saliva Test for Oral Health
There are three critical phases
of periodontal disease with biomarkers
released first into gingival
crevicular fluid and then into saliva.
The three biological phases are
inflammation, connective tissue
degradation and alveolar bone
turnover. Six protein biomarkers
can be measured in saliva: interluekin
1beta (IL-1ß), interleukin-8
(IL-8), macrophyage inflammatory
protein (MIP), matrix metalloproteinase-8, (MMP-8), osteoprotegerin
(OPG) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α).
Researchers at the University of Kentucky in Lexington monitored
these six biomarkers in a group of 68 subjects with chronic
periodontitis. Half the group received oral hygiene instruction
(OHI) alone and the other half received oral hygiene instructions
and scaling and root planing (SRP). Saliva samples and clinical
exams were done at baseline, 16 weeks and 28 weeks.
Both groups showed improved periodontal health, with greater
clinical healing in the SRP group. Both groups showed reductions in
OPG and TNF-α. IL-1ß and MMP-8 levels were significantly
reduced only in the SRP group. IL-1ß was reduced at both time
points for the SRP group and only at 28 weeks in the control group.
Those who responded well to OHI (27 percent) or SRP (63
percent) were evaluated separately, showing significant reductions
in OPG, MMP-8 and MIP-1α at both 16 and 28 weeks. Based on
these findings, salivary biomarker levels could provide valuable
information for the assessment of periodontal health both in dental
and non-dental settings.
Clinical Implications: In the not-too-distant future, consumers will buy over-the-counter saliva tests to measure and monitor their periodontal health.
Sexton, W., Lin, Y, Kryscio, R., Dawson III, D., Ebersole, J., Miller,
C: Salivary Biomarkers of Periodontal Disease in Response to
Treatment. J Clin Perio 38: 434-441, 2011. |
Salivary Occult Blood Test
for Perio
Perioscreen is a new salivary occult blood test
developed by Sunstar International in Japan. The
paper strips detect human hemoglobin in saliva using
a colloidal gold-labeled antibody. After swishing with
three milliliters of distilled water for 10 seconds, the
mixture is spit into a cup and the Perioscreen test strip
is dipped into the saliva sample. The colloidal gold-labeled
antibody dissolves in the salvia sample and if
blood is present, an immune complex is formed and
moves up the test strip by capillary action, resulting in
a magenta line.
Researchers in Japan compared findings of the
Perioscreen test to clinical examination in a group of
2,861 residents of the town of Hisayama in southern
Japan. The clinical exam consisted of probing and
bleeding scores on mesial-facial and mid-facial surfaces
of all teeth. This screening method is known for underestimating
periodontal disease, but is used for speed and
convenience. Subjects also completed a questionnaire
about dental history, medications and general health.
In 52 percent of subjects, no probing depths of
4mm or deeper were found and in 60 percent of subjects,
bleeding upon probing was less than 15 percent
of sites.
Based on bleeding and probing depths, subjects
were divided into two groups – poor periodontal health
and healthy. A total of 1,197 were diagnosed with poor
periodontal health, while only 861 had a positive
Perioscreen test and 336 had false negative scores. Of the
801 periodontally healthy subjects, 384 had positive
Perioscreen tests and 417 had negative tests.
Clinical Implications: The Perioscreen test from
Sunstar might be a screening option in the U.S. in
the near future.
Shimazaki, Y., Akifusa, S., et al: Effectiveness of the
Salivary Occult Blood Test as a Screening Method for
Periodontal Status. J Perio 82: 581-587, 2011. |
Mothers Share Caries Risk with Their Children
The relationship between parents' oral health and the oral
health of their children was reported in 1946 among 3,000
offspring in 1,150 families. Caries levels in
15-19 year olds was twice as high when parents
had high caries rates compared to children
of parents with low caries rates. Several
studies show that both parents influence the
caries rates of children, but the influence of
the mother's oral health is greater.
Researchers at the University of California,
San Francisco evaluated agricultural
workers in Mendota, California, 160 miles
southeast of San Francisco. A total of 179
mothers and their 387 children were evaluated
clinically. Most mothers (80 percent)
reported their oral health to be fair or poor
and only 33 percent had ever received professional dental
hygiene care. Six percent of mothers and 19 percent of
children had never had a dental visit. One-third of the
mothers and 85 percent of the children had Medicaid
dental insurance.
Untreated caries were found in 46 percent of mothers with a
mean decayed-filled-surfaces score (DFS) of 13.5, affecting half
their teeth. Untreated caries were found in 27
percent of children (average age of the children
was nine years, ranging from one to 17 years).
The DFS rate for permanent teeth was 4.3 and
the rate for deciduous teeth was 13.5.
The adjusted odds ratio for this group was
similar to that reported in 1946. The children
of mothers with untreated caries were twice as
likely to have untreated caries themselves.
Clinical Implications: Caries prevention for children begins with the mothers. Mothers should be encouraged to get their oral health in order before their children's teeth erupt to reduce the child's caries risk.
Weintraub, J., Prakash, P., Shain, S., Laccabue, M, Gansky, S.:
Mothers' Caries Increases Odds of Children's Caries. J Dent
Research 89: 954-958, 2010. |
Gingivitis Causes Endotoxemia
Gingivitis is a reversible inflammation of the gingival tissues,
triggered by endotoxin. Endotoxin is part of gram-negative bacterial
cell walls. Endotoxins pass through altered sulcular epithelium,
triggering an inflammatory response from the body that
includes activation and recruitment of white blood cells, specifically
neutrophils. Endotoxins also find their way into the
bloodstream and move to other parts of the body.
Researchers at Indiana University, School of Dentistry monitored
endotoxin levels in the blood of 50 healthy black and
white men and women who participated in an experimental gingivitis
study.
For three weeks, study subjects refrained from all oral
hygiene to induce experimental gingivitis. At the three-week
point, subjects received a prophylaxis and resumed daily
oral hygiene with two more weeks of monitoring. Blood
samples were taken at baseline, following three weeks without
oral hygiene and again two weeks after resuming daily
oral hygiene.
Endotoxemia was evident in 56 percent of serum samples
after three weeks of experimental gingivitis. Two weeks later,
endotoxemia levels were back to baseline levels. Neutrophil
activity was also measured in the blood, with levels elevated at
three weeks and returning to baseline levels after two weeks of
oral hygiene. In identifying endotoxin positive and negative subjects,
it was evident that of the endotoxin negative subjects,
more neutrophil activity was seen in black subjects. In endotoxin
positive subjects, more neutrophil activity was seen in
women. Persistent neutrophil activity over time plays a role in
tissue destruction. Periodontitis is more destructive, but gingivitis
presents an early problem that needs to be addressed.
Clinical Implications: Gingivitis triggers systemic changes that might have significant implications on general health.
Wahaidi, V., Kowolik, M., Eckert, G., Galli, D: Endotoxemia and
the Host Systemic Response During Experiment Gingivitis. J Clin
Perio 38:412-417, 2011. |
Adolescent Smoking and Toothbrushing
Smoking is a significant risk factor for periodontal disease as well as other
systemic diseases. Another risk factor is poor oral hygiene. These two risk
behaviors, when started early, might become life-long habits.
Researchers at the University of Tampere in Finland used a 12-page survey
with 85 questions to gather data from teens about smoking and daily toothbrushing.
Demographic questions were also included. These teens were all part
of a larger ongoing health study in Finland.
The survey was sent to 9,853 teens ages 14, 16 and 18, with 5,643 surveys
returned for an overall response rate of 65 percent. The response rate for girls
was 73 percent compared to 57 percent for boys.
Daily smoking was reported by nearly 10 percent of 14 year olds, 25 percent
of 16 year olds and 33 percent of 18 year olds. A higher percentage of girls
smoked at age 14 and 16 compared to boys. At age 18, daily smoking was similar
for both boys and girls.
A higher percentage of girls in all age groups reported toothbrushing
more than once per day compared to boys. Daily smoking and brushing less
than twice a day were reported by seven percent of 14 year olds, 18 percent
of 16 year olds and 22 percent of 18 year olds. This combination of two
unhealthy habits suggests an increased risk of periodontal disease for these
teens in Finland.
Clinical Implications: Tobacco cessation advice as well as oral hygiene
coaching during routine dental visits for teens is advised. Research suggests
that teens are more likely to listen to dental professionals about
smoking risks than their parents.
Honkala, S., Honkala, E., Newton, T., Rimpelä, A.: Toothbrushing and Smoking
Among Adolescents - Aggregation of Health Damaging Behaviours. J Clin Perio 38:
442-448, 2011. |
No Brain Benefit from Chewing Gum
Chewing gum is considered beneficial for oral hygiene, to help cope with airsickness
and as an alternative to smoking. Researchers have suggested, anecdotally,
that chewing gum enhances brain function.
Researchers at the University of Vienna in Austria wondered whether chewing
gum would improve spatial task performance by healthy young adults. The Endless
Loop Test (ELT) was used to measure spatial task performance. Individually, in a
quiet room, seated before a computer, subjects were instructed to look at two images
of an endless loop. The second image was rotated and the subject was asked to identify
the direction of the rotation. A total of 23 image pairs were evaluated, with
some used only for warm-up that were not
included in the final analysis.
In the first experiment, three groups
were tested: 117 subjects chewed sugared
gum, 115 chewed sugar-less gum and 117
did not chew gum during the test. The test
took approximately 10 minutes.
The second experiment involved the
same ELT with different images. A group
of 50 subjects were given sugar-free gum
and instructed to chew during the test.
The control group of 50 did not chew
gum during the test.
Chewing gum did not enhance spatial
task performance in either test. Those
chewing gum did slightly worse than controls,
but the difference was not statistically
significant. The addition of sugar for
the group chewing sugared gum did not
provide any benefit over sugar-free gum or
not chewing gum at all.
Clinical
Implications: Neither chewing
gum nor the presence of sugar in chewing
gums enhanced the performance of
spatial tasks.
Nader, I., Gittler, G., Waldherr, K.,
Pietschnig, J.: Chew on this: No Support
for Facilitating Effects of Gum on Spatial
Task Performance. Arch Oral Biol 55:712-
717, 2010. |