Perio
Reports Vol. 23 No. 3 |
Perio Reports provides easy-to-read research summaries on topics of specific interest to clinicians.
Perio Reports research summaries will be included in each issue to keep you on the cutting edge
of dental hygiene science.
|
Metronidazole and Amoxicillin – The "van Winkelhoff Cocktail"
Generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP) is often rapidly
advancing and is associated with Aa (Aggregatibacter [Actinobacillus]
actinomycetemcomitans) bacteria. Two decades ago
Professor Arie Jan van Winkelhoff introduced the idea of giving
GAgP patients two antibiotics at the same time, metronidazole
and amoxicillin, in conjunction with SRP. It has since become
known as the van Winkelhoff Cocktail. This approach was
designed specifically to treat Aa infections.
Researchers at the University of Basel in Switzerland performed
bacterial susceptibility tests specifically for metronidazole
and amoxicillin using plaque samples from four smokers with
untreated GAgP. They collected the plaque from the two deepest
pockets in each subject and immediately plated them on several
dishes of blood agar infused with varying concentrations of the
individual antibiotics and a combination of the two.
The bacterial counts of the plaque samples on standard agar
were very high. Low concentrations of amoxicillin reduced the
number of colony-forming units for all four samples. Higher
concentrations prevented growth for two samples and reduced
growth for the others. The low and high concentrations of
metronidazole lowered the counts, but never eliminated growth.
Both the low and high concentrations of the combination of the
two antibiotics prevented all bacterial growth in all four samples.
It seems there is either an additive or synergistic effect when
the two antibiotics are combined, which stops all growth for all
the plaque samples.
Clinical Implications: Systemic antibiotics are not recommended
for routine periodontal treatment, but for cases of
GAgP, especially in smokers, the van Winkelhoff Cocktail
might provide significant benefits.
Walter, C., Kulik, E., Weiger, R., Zitzmann, N., Waltimo, T.:
Additive or Synergistic Antimicrobial Effects of Amoxicillin and
Metronidazole on Whole Plaque Samples: A Preliminary Report. J
of Inter Academy of Perio 13: 11-16, 2011. |
|
Timing of Systemic
Antibiotic Important
Generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP) exhibits
severe destruction of supporting alveolar bone, often
leading to edentulism early in life. The initial phase of
treatment is reducing or eliminating the pathogenic
microorganisms. Researchers suggest adding systemic
antibiotics when treating GAgP.
Researchers at the Eastman Dental Institute in
London, UK wanted to know if the timing of when a
systemic antibiotic was given changed the outcome of
treatment. In a two-phase study they first treated a group
of 41 GAgP subjects with full-mouth SRP within two
days, giving half the subjects placebo pills and the other
half amoxicillin and metronidazole to be taken for seven
days. Subjects were all given chlorhexidine mouth rinse
to be used twice daily for two weeks. Clinical indices
were monitored at baseline, two and six months.
At six months, all subjects again received full-mouth
SRP. Those that had received the placebo before were
now given the antibiotics.
The greatest healing took place in the first two
months following treatment for both the test and
placebo groups. At eight months, more healing had been
realized in both groups, confirming other research that
reported healing up to nine months after initial treatment.
Those who received antibiotics at baseline showed
greater overall healing than those who received antibiotics
later at re-treatment. This might be due to
increased vascularity in the beginning, delivering more
antibiotic to the area.
Clinical Implications: If you are treating a patient
with GAgP, consider using systemic antibiotics at the
initial phase of treatment rather than waiting.
Griffiths, G., Ayob, R., Guerrero, A., Nibali, L., Suvan, J.,
Moles, D., Tonetti, M.: Amoxicillin and Metronidazole as an
Adjunctive Treatment in Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis
at Initial Therapy or Re-treatment: A Randomized
Controlled Clinical Trial. J Clin Perio 38: 43-49, 2011. |
|
|
Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation
In an earlier report, short-term calcium and vitamin D
supplementation seemed to enhance periodontal health. The
same research group evaluated the periodontal maintenance
patients after one year to determine if the positive benefits of
nutritional supplementation persisted.
A total of 51 periodontal maintenance patients were
evaluated at Saint Louis University and Southern Illinois
University. Mandibular posterior teeth were evaluated at baseline,
six and 12 months. Clinical indices included plaque,
bleeding, probing, attachment levels, calculus and furcations.
All patients had at least two interproximal sites with 3mm or
more of clinical attachment loss. Digital radiographs were
used to measure alveolar bone levels.
Nutritional supplements were taken by 23 of the subjects
and nutritional analysis was used to determine total
daily intake of vitamin D and calcium for both test and
control groups.
Total daily calcium and vitamin D intakes varied significantly
between the groups. Those with supplementation averaged
1,769mg of calcium and 1,049IU of vitamin D. Those
not taking supplementation were estimated from diet analysis
to be receiving an average of 642mg of calcium and 156IU of
vitamin D each day.
Both groups showed significantly improved periodontal
health over the one-year period. Those taking calcium and
vitamin D supplementation showed a modest positive
effect on periodontal health. It's difficult to separate out
all the factors that influence periodontal health, including
oral hygiene and subgingival instrumentation. Randomized
clinical trials are needed to confirm a positive effect for
supplementation.
Clinical Implications: Although calcium and vitamin D supplementation showed a slight benefit, at this time we cannot suggest these two nutrients will significantly enhance periodontal health.
Garcia, M., Hildebolt, C., Miley, D., Dixon, et al: One-Year
Effects of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Chronic
Periodontitis. J Perio 82: 25-32, 2011. |
|
Quadrant and Full-mouth SRP Equivalent
Removing subgingival bacterial biofilm and any deposits on
the root surfaces is the primary goal of both surgical and nonsurgical
therapy for moderate to severe periodontitis. The time
frame for accomplishing the scaling and root planing (SRP) can
be one quadrant per week or full-mouth (FM) instrumentation
within two days. Comparisons show both approaches achieve
similar clinical outcomes, so the choice is up to the patient and
the clinician.
Researchers at Pontificia University in Bogota, Colombia
compared quadrant SRP to FM instrumentation with and
without systemic antibiotics, to see if the antibiotics would
enhance healing. A total of 29 patients with moderate to
severe periodontitis participated in the study. The three
groups were seen at baseline for data collection, for their
assigned treatment appointment and re-evaluation four to six
weeks after treatment. Those in the FM plus antibiotic group
underwent bacterial susceptibility testing to determine which
antibiotic should be used. Amoxicillin, 875mg, was taken
twice daily by four subjects and doxycycline, 100mg, once a
day was taken by the other six subjects.
No significant differences were found in clinical healing
between the three groups. All groups showed significant reductions
in bleeding and probing depths. No additional clinical
benefits were obtained by those taking antibiotics. Both FM
groups showed significant reductions in anaerobic bacterial
counts compared to the quadrant control group.
Clinical Implications: Similar clinical outcomes are achieved with both traditional quadrant SRP and FM SRP, with and without systemic antibiotics. It is still up to the clinician and patient to decide which approach they prefer.
Serrano, C., Torres, N., Bejarano, A., Caviedes, M., Castellanos,
M.: Clinical and Microbiological Comparisons of Three Non-
Surgical Protocols for the Initial Treatment of Chronic
Periodontitis. J Inter Academy of Perio 13: 17-26, 2011. |
|
Water Floss Better Than String Floss
Periodontal disease begins between the teeth, yet oral hygiene instructions begin with
tooth brushing and eventually add dental flossing. Cleaning between the teeth with floss is
more difficult than brushing, and consequently, the majority of people rarely use dental floss.
Other effective, easy-to-use devices need
to be recommended.
Researchers at the University of
Amsterdam in the Netherlands compared
three interdental devices in a group of 104
university students (no dental students).
To participate in the study, students had to
have bleeding scores of at least 50 percent,
with at least five teeth per quadrant and
no advanced periodontal disease. Subjects
were randomly assigned to one of three
groups: Johnson and Johnson waxed
dental floss, Water Pik WaterFlosser with
the standard jet tip and the Water Pik
WaterFlosser with a new irrigator tip with
three tufts of bristles around the opening.
Bleeding was evaluated at baseline,
two weeks and four weeks. All three
groups showed reduced bleeding scores at
two weeks, with relative reductions of 13
percent in the flossing group, and 20 and
26 percent in the two irrigation groups. By
week four, the flossing group had returned
to baseline bleeding levels. The oral irrigation
groups also showed some backsliding,
but still maintained significant bleeding
reductions of 15 and 17 percent. There
was no significant difference between the
two irrigation tips for reducing bleeding.
Plaque scores showed no differences at
any point in time for any of the groups.
Clinical Implications: Based on these
findings, the Water Pik WaterFlosser is
better than waxed floss for reducing
gingival bleeding.
Rosema, N., Hennequin-Hoenderdos, N.,
Berchier, C., Slot, D., Lyle, D., Van der
Weijden, G.: The Effect of Different
Interdental Cleaning Devices on Gingival
Bleeding. J Inter Academy of Perio 13: 2-
10, 2011. |
|
Oscillating-rotating Power Brushes Safe
Many studies have been published over the past two decades comparing
power and manual toothbrushes. The evidence reported in these research studies
shows power toothbrushes to be at least as effective as manual toothbrushes
and in some cases better. Concerns have been raised that power toothbrushes
might potentially cause trauma to both hard and soft tissues, raising questions
of safety. Many studies do include an evaluation of power toothbrush safety,
but few studies are focused specifically on safety.
No review articles covering the published literature on the safety of specific
power toothbrushes were available. Therefore, a team of researchers from universities
in Amsterdam, Germany, Missouri and Michigan evaluated published
research comparing oscillating-rotating power toothbrushes to manual toothbrushes
for safety.
They evaluated several hundred papers and found 35 studies that met their
stated research and reporting criteria. In most studies, toothbrush safety was
measured by gingival recession and/or abrasion. Only two of these studies
looked primarily at safety outcomes and there was no significant difference in
recession reported when comparing the oscillating-rotating brush to a manual
brush. A descriptive analysis was reported in 24 of the studies which showed
very few brushing related adverse events. These studies also showed no difference
in recession between the power and manual brushes tested.
Based on these findings, the research
until now shows that oscillating-rotating
power toothbrushes do not pose a risk for
gingival recession.
Clinical
Implications: According to the
research, oscillating-rotating power
toothbrushes are as safe as manual
toothbrushes.
Van der Weijden, F., Campbell, S., Dörfer,
C., Gonzalez-Cabezas, C., Slot, D.: Safety of
Oscillating-Rotating Powered Brushes
Compared to Manual Toothbrushes: A
Systematic Review. J Perio 82: 5-24, 2011. |
|