As the traditional restorations are reviewed – porcelain-fused-to-metal,
gold, zirconium-oxide supported, aluminum-oxide supported,
leucite-reinforced, and lab-processed resin – each one presents with
compromises that limit it from being "ideal." There is, however, a new
material. IPS e.max appears to meet more of these requirements than
other materials and as more clinical and scientific studies emerge, it
might eventually emerge as the "ideal."
IPS e.max is lithium disilicate with a unique crystalline structure
that mimics the aesthetics of natural dentin and enamel combined
with a flexural strength greater than any other all-ceramic system on
the market today. Further exploration of e.max lithium disilicate
reveals the following:
Aesthetics – The crystalline structure of lithium disilicate yields very
high aesthetic value that provides excellent results for both anterior
veneers or crowns (Figs. 1-4), as well as natural appearing posterior full
coverage restorations (Figs. 5 & 6).
Strength and durability – The flexural strength of e.max lithium
disilicate is between 360-400mPA, which is approximately two to four
times more durable than all other ceramic systems on the market.
Studies have shown that the lithium disilicate material is the strongest
all-ceramic system available and yields clinical success superior to
porcelain-fused-to-metal crown.1,2,3 This material, whether used as a
monolithic full coverage crown in the posterior or as an anterior
restoration increasing length with worn dentition, is ideal to use in
high stress situations. This increased strength, compared to other
ceramic systems, also allows for the use of e.max for anterior three-unit
bridges and anterior cantilever bridges with missing lateral incisors
(Figs. 7 & 8).
Bondability – The ability to adhesively bond to a restorative
material provides not only increased retention, but will also yield
improved marginal sealing. The e.max lithium disilicate can be etched
using hydrofluoric acid, which can then be silanated and bonded
using current dentinal adhesive agents and resin cements. This allows
this material to be used in conservative, tooth-strengthening posterior
restorations and also for anterior veneers where traditional retention
and resistance form is non-existent. This increased retention also
offers significant advantages for short clinical crown preparations in
posterior teeth.
Wear compatibility – Studies have shown that both in vitro and
clinically, the wear of lithium disilicate is lower against opposing
enamel than many commonly used ceramic materials and is comparable
to enamel against enamel wear.4,5 Not only will this provide a
restoration that will provide long-term occlusal stability, but will also allow the use of e.max in situations where there is opposition against
natural dentition such as canine veneers and crowns during laterotrusive
movements where there has always been a concern about long-term
wear of the opposing enamel.
Marginal integrity – The fabrication process of e.max lithium
disilicate promotes ideal marginal integrity. These restorations can
either be fabricated using the "lost wax" process used with gold and
leucite-reinforced ceramic (IPS Empress) or using CAD/CAM technology.
Both of these techniques yield improved marginal integrity
over traditional powder-liquid ceramic build-up techniques used with
other systems. Studies have shown "gold-like" marginal results with
these techniques. The hardness and strength of the lithium disilicate
also allows improved marginal finishing techniques by the ceramist
yielding more accurate margination.
Conservative preparation options – Studies have shown that
intra-coronal bonded restorations can actually have "tooth-strengthening"
properties that are superior to non-adhesively bonded
restorations.6 This advantage allows "bondable" ceramics to be used
as intra-coronal and single-cusp restorations where other materials
would warrant more aggressive, extra-coronal restorations (Figs. 9,
10, 11 & 12). With the increased popularity of more conservative
and even "prepless" veneers, the need for materials that will provide
aesthetic restorations in very thin applications (0.2-0.3mm)
becomes increasingly important and e.max lithium disilicate meets
these requirements (Figs. 13 & 14).
Cementation options – Due to the increased strength of the
lithium disilicate, this material allows for either adhesive/resin
cementation or traditional cementation using non-adhesive techniques.
This quality is especially desirable when placing a full
coverage restoration in an area where complete isolation might be
difficult, such as with second molar restorations. Self-etching resin
cements, resin ionomers and even glass ionomers can be used with
the lithium disilicate restorations, as long as adequate retention and
resistance is achieved with preparation design.
Although there might not be a perfect replacement for dentin and
enamel; research, development and creative applications of new materials
have given dentistry some options to overcome the inadequacies
of traditional alternatives. e.max lithium disilicate might not be our
final solution, but it is closer than anything we have seen in the past
and will only open up opportunities for enhanced treatment options
in the future.
References
- Mouth Motion Fatigue and Durability Study. Petra C Guess, Ricardo Zavanelli, Nelson Silva and
Van P Thompson, NYU
- Dental Advisor, "4-Year Clinical Performance: IPS e.max," June 2010, Volume 27, No. 05
- Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, Kern M., "Clinical outcome of three-unit Lithium-disilicate glassceramic
fixed dental prostheses: up to 8 years results."
- IADR 2009 General Session, Miami, Florida Abstract #1009
- J. Esquivel-Upshaw, W. Rose, E.R. Oliveira, DDS, and K.J. Anusavice, University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL, University of Texas, HSC at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
- Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars adhesively restored. Ausiello, et al. Amer Journ
Dent Vol 10(5) Oct 1997
|




 |