Where does the prudent dentist go
for good financial education and advice?
There are a myriad of investment
advisers with no state or national licensing.
Bankers, insurance salesmen, mortgage brokers,
real estate brokers, traditional brokers, certified financial
planners, certified life underwriters, no-load brokers, and your
know-it-all brother-in-law, all claim to be “financial advisers.” Let
us triage the horde.
There are two main groups of financial professionals, those
who mainly sell and those who advise. Let’s look at the salesmen
first.
Insurance brokers, bankers, mortgage brokers and anyone else
touting to be a financial advisor without the CFP (more on that
later) designation usually have limited education and normally will
try to sell you a pre-packaged investment vehicle that has onerous
fees. They might or might not provide other advice. Buyer beware.
Beware, in particular, of any insurance company offering a
retirement plan. Often they are deferred group annuities providing
only a small choice of funds charging significantly more than
a discount broker would charge for the same funds.
What about the traditional broker? “Broker-dealers” – known
as stockbrokers – have been the usual adviser for many of us. Little
did we know this crew has always been exempt from the
Investment Advisors Act of 1940. The law exempts traditional
brokers from “fully disclosing how they’re paid or revealing conflicts
of interest that might bias their recommendations. Nor are
they subject to the same stringent rules regarding fiduciary duty – that is, placing a client’s interests ahead of their own – as are other
advisers.” In 2006, part of this exemption was stripped, yet brokers
still may sell commissioned products without the fiduciary
responsibility of protecting the client’s best interest. No other
advisers have this exemption.
A seminal eight-year study presented to the American Finance
Association 2006 meeting, concluded that traditional stock broker
"load" (commission-based) funds, perform significantly worse
than those from a no-load discount broker, before the additional
fees and commissions are taken into account.¹ Repeat, load funds
from traditional brokers do worse than similar no-load funds from
discount brokers. Period. Sorry Morgan Stanley, Smith Barney and
Merrill Lynch. Hello Fidelity, Vanguard and Scottrade.
The financial industry’s general practitioner for comprehensive
financial planning is the Certified Financial Planner (CFP). They
can provide a financial plan, insurance help, and plan your estate.
For managing your money on an ongoing basis, use a Registered
Investment Advisor (RIA). Both CFPs and RIAs act as fiduciaries.
That is, they are required by law to act in your best interest. Conflict
of interest selling “load,” or products with commissions, is not an
issue. As mentioned above, traditional brokers do not have this legal
requirement. Often CFPs are also Registered Investment Advisors.
CFPs and RIAs are fee-only; no commission is involved. CFPs and
RIAs almost always use the discount brokerages, such as Fidelity,
Vanguard, Schwab, etc., as third party custodians for accounts.
There are other, less well-known designations that also are ethical
and have continuing educational requirements. Please make
sure that an adviser you are considering is fee-only and has no conflict
of interest.
Where does the prudent dentist find these competent people?
Traditional brokerages, banks, and insurance companies pitch a
warm appeal for your financial goals, yet provide products that
have high costs and under-perform. There are, though, many ethical,
high quality sources that utilize the aforementioned planners.
I’ll touch on those with which I am familiar and stress that this is
an incomplete list:
First let’s look at dentist-oriented advisers. You will receive
detailed and individual advice on all financial, insurance, small
business retirement planning, and estate planning with these; be
prepared to pay higher fees than with the other groups. Dentist-oriented
advisers also offer practice transition service. They usually
employ CFPs or CPAs.
Hufford Financial, Caine Watters and Mercer Advisers are
examples.
Second, independent, fee-only planners, normally again CFPs,
provide comprehensive advice, including small business retirement
plans, estate planning, and insurance advice, at a lower fee than the
dentist-oriented specialists. According to Consumer Reports, comprehensive
financial plans obtained from independent advisers
average $3,000 with management fees normally between 0.5 and
1.0 percent of assets. Additional fees apply to small business retirement
plans.
Garret Financial Network lists experienced CFPs, and is recommended
by Consumer Reports. Another highly rated company that
also provides extensive educational resources and planning services
is Merriman Advisors.
Discount brokers offer the lowest fees, yet plans might not be
as comprehensive as the other advisors, with some including estate
planning and insurance advice, some not. Small business retirement
plan sophistication also varies. Charles Schwab, in particular,
offers extensive retirement options, yet does not provide in-house
insurance and estate planning. The discount brokers employ large
numbers of CFPs, CPAs, tax attorneys and actuaries to handle your
needs. All provide financial planning for fees of $1,500 or less, with
management fees of between 0.5 to 1.0 percent for ongoing advice.
Vanguard, Fidelity, Charles Schwab, T. Rowe Price, and others provide
reasonable, easy-to-understand and balanced investment and
retirement planning assistance.
Which is best for the prudent dentist? The discount brokers
provide the lowest rates, yet might not provide all services one
desires. Independent, fee-only planners provide extensive service
with moderate pricing. Dentist-oriented planners provide the
extensive services of the independent planner with the added benefit
of transition assistance, yet one will pay much higher fees.
Please note that any business mentioned above does not have
my endorsement and that many competent financial firms not
mentioned are available.
What about going it alone? To set up one’s own financial and
retirement accounts with a discount broker, find one’s own insurance
and to coordinate with one’s estate planning attorney has
merit and has been done by many, including yours truly. Fees are
kept to a minimum, yet the time necessary to reallocate funds periodically,
update insurance correctly, and keep all components
organized might be more than the busy practitioner can handle.
In interviewing many dentists over a wide age and income
spectrum over the last three years, my strong feeling is that those
who employ a professional to handle all financial affairs come out
in better financial shape and have much less stress.
But, for heaven’s sake, please keep away from the insurance
“retirement specialist” salesmen and their sneaky annuities!
On that note, dentists often report hearing, “Doctor, what if I
told you about a product that invests in the stock market, pays a
minimum of five percent per year, and guarantees you will never
lose money?”
It seems that in every course I give there is someone in the audience
that has either purchased one of these products or is considering
them. What are they?
They are equity index annuities. Numerous alerts have been
posted regarding the sales tactics of insurance agents selling these
products over the last several years. As recently as June 25, 2008,
the Securities and Exchange Commission issued statements warning
of fraudulent claims made regarding these products.²
What is an annuity? In the simplest form, you give an insurance
company a sum of money and the insurance company pays
you a guaranteed sum for the rest of your life. This is a fixed annuity.
Many variations have come about over the years to attempt to
spice up the basic premise and usually increase the commission for
the seller. An annuity invested in mutual funds, with a hope of an
eventual higher return than one formed from a one-time lump
sum, is called a variable annuity.
Let’s look at this latest annuity, the equity index annuity, often
investing in a common stock market index:
The guaranteed minimum return, in this case five percent,
might only apply to a portion of your total investment, and the contract
might require you to hold the investment for up to 15 years
to get credit for any increase!
Further, that gain of the index you participate in, say the S&P
500, will normally be reduced by the following:- Participation rate: It allows you to recover a certain percentage
of the index’s gain, often 80 percent.
- Index Rate Cap: You might have a limit of say seven percent
on any gain on your funds. If the S&P 500 gained 25 percent in a
year, you would only be eligible for seven percent times 80 percent!
- Margin or Spread: The index gain for many annuities is
determined by subtracting a margin or spread. This is often
three percent.
Thus, in the preceding example, an S&P 500 return of 25 percent
would be capped at seven percent, reduced to 5.6 percent by
the participation rate, then decreased down to 2.6 percent by the
margin or spread. As you can see, in good years for the stock market
you would be severely hampered.³
Can you actually lose money in one of these funds? According
to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, yes! If you need
to cancel your contract early, in some cases before 15 years, you will
pay a significant surrender charge and suffer tax penalties.
The bottom line here is that you’d have a better return with
far more liquidity by investing in U.S. Treasuries. Further information
is available at the Securities and Exchange Commission at
the listed site.
References- Bergstresser, Daniel B., Chalmers, John M.R. and Tufano, Peter, ”Assessing the Costs and Benefits
of Brokers in the Mutual Fund Industry”(October 1, 2007). AFA 2006 Boston Meetings; HBS
Finance Working Paper No. 616981. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=616981.
- See press release at www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-123.htm.
- Collins, Patrick, Lam, Huy, Stemp, Josh, “Equity Indexed Annuities: Downside Protection, But
at What Cost?,” Journal of Financial Planning, 22:5, 48-57.
|