Three years ago, CAD/CAM use in the dental lab profession was in its infancy but its supporters were certain it would change
how labs created their products. Glidewell Laboratories President and CEO, Jim Glidewell, CDT, recently spoke with Dentaltown
Magazine to report on how his lab – one of the United States’ well-known dental laboratories and 18-time Townie Choice Award
winner – has progressed with this new technology, amongst newer innovations and product offerings.
Jim, the last time Dentaltown Magazine visited
your lab there were a few new technologies you
had implemented – primarily CAD/CAM. What
has come to fruition since?
Glidewell: The past two years have been very exciting. The
company has continued to invest time and money in
CAD/CAM technology. CAD/CAM restorations now account
for a large percent of our business; in our all-ceramic department
alone, 65 percent of IPS e.max cases are done using
CAD/CAM technology (e.max CAD) and this number will
continue to grow.
Dentists have already discovered the precision of contacts, fit
and occlusion made possible through computer-aided design
and milling processes. I would venture to say that they are as
excited about the consistency of CAD/CAM as we are. And for
doctors who own a CEREC system, we offer a broader range of
CAD/CAM products including full-cast gold, PFMs, BruxZir
and even bridgework when they send us their digital scan files.
We’ve found that our CAD/CAM-fabricated crowns and
bridges require less chairside adjustment, and provide a consistency
of quality that meets the standard of care for both dentists
and patients. In addition we are pushing model-less restorations,
which reduce turnaround time and cost. In fact the price to send
a digital scan for a model-less crown is 10 percent off our list
price for an IPS e.max or BruxZir crown.
Speaking of BruxZir Solid Zirconia, the concept of a monolithic,
solid zirconia restoration has really resonated with our
doctors’ desire for a chip-proof crown or bridge, especially for
their bruxing and grinding patients. BruxZir offers a high strength
solution that is durable. In a recent study at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, BruxZir crowns wore enamel virtually
the same as e.max. And while we’ve said again and again that
BruxZir is more brawn than beauty, the feedback these full-contour zirconia
crowns and bridges have received is very favorable. Patients, when
given a choice between BruxZir, a metal occlusal PFM and cast gold, will
choose the most lifelike, tooth-colored restoration, which is BruxZir.
What’s more, the precision fit of contacts and occlusion has received praise
from doctors too, which is no surprise to us since BruxZir Solid Zirconia
restorations are made using 100 percent CAD/CAM technology.
We’ve also introduced our Inclusive line of custom implant abutments.
Available in All-Zirconia, Zirconia with Titanium Insert and Titanium,
Inclusive Custom Abutments offer high quality for an affordable price.
They also offer greater value with all the parts and services included in the
price and are available for up to seven of the most popular implant systems
in 20 implant platforms.
In 2007, you indicated that CAD/CAM was the future of
dentistry. In the time since, how has CAD/CAM changed your lab? Glidewell:It has improved our consistency of fit, contacts and especially
occlusion. When we design restorations using CAD technology, we
have the ability to dial in the occlusion and contacts to precise measurements.
This precision ensures that occlusion will require minimal adjustment
and the contacts will snap floss. These benefits added together save
the dentist valuable chairtime.
In 2009, more than 45 percent of our entire fixed crown and bridge
production was made with some form of either CAD or CAD/CAM.
Today, we are seeing fewer returns, adjustments and complaints from our
customers. The fact that we are working with more doctors than ever
before attests to the quality and consistency CAD/CAM provides.
In which manner has CAD/CAM technology changed the
processes in your labs? Glidewell: We’ve gotten even closer to using CAD/CAM as a solution
to the “human input” inconsistencies that exist. Dental technicians,
invariably, put their subjective judgments into every crown, whereas a
CAD/CAM system only interprets its information digitally and repeats it
digitally every time. It has a perfect recall, if you will. The technicians produce
good crowns one day, then maybe they didn’t feel good the second
day – so each technician’s work can even look somewhat different from
day to day. Then across the spectrum of technicians that we have here, the
up-and-down quality variations are much more noticeable. With a
CAD/CAM system, it reproduces the same quality again and again.
How do you determine whether a case gets sent
through CAD/CAM or via dental technicians? Glidewell: There are no CAD/CAM cases that get done without technician
involvement just yet. CEREC would be the closest to a completely
CAD/CAM-fabricated restoration, but currently it still needs some refinement
of anatomy, margins, contours and then has to be stained and glazed.
If the doctor prescribes it or there are no technical issues, such as no space
for ceramic, unclear margins, etc., then we use some version of CAD/CAM.

How do you standardize the form and morphology
of the crowns and how do you control the
quality of the restorations?
Glidewell: We started to standardize our crown morphology
originally through the use of a dental technology DVD,
Common Sense Laboratory Technology for Dental Technicians,
which attempts to teach a repeatable morphology. Then we educated
our technicians on the use of silicone occlusal molds, pre-made
wax patterns and pressable ceramics. Today we work from
a digital scan taken from either the mouth or model, design the
crown with CAD, and output that directly to CAM for ceramic
milling or printing of a wax pattern.
The control of quality with 10 people in a lab is the same as
if you have 1,000 in a lab. But a common perception is that a
lot of the technicians aren’t as good as the rest, and dentists
always seem to want your “best technician” to work on their
cases. The truth is we don’t have a group of “best technicians;”
rather, each technician is expected to try his or her best, but
none will ever realistically attain a repeatable, perfect quality
product. However, the more we become involved with
CAD/CAM products, the better control you will have on quality.
Machines don’t care how they feel in the morning; they just
perform their tasks.
Is there still a concern that Glidewell is getting
“too big”? Glidewell: No, we’re not concerned with becoming too big;
we are just growing with the needs of the growing dental profession.
Although we have a large number of technicians, there may
be only three to four technicians that work on an individual case.
We also determine through a Peak Performance Profile where
each technician excels. They may specialize in zirconia or PFMs
or posteriors or anteriors. One of the other advantages of our size
is the ability to buy in bulk. We are able to pay less for supplies
and materials, and we pass the savings on to our customers.
Where are you investing most of your time and
money right now? Glidewell: People ask me how much of my money I am going
to invest in R&D this year, but I don’t see it as my money being
invested. I see it as the dentists’ money being invested to improve
technology and lower cost, which directly benefits them. We
invest heavily in our digital manufacturing, specifically
CAD/CAM technology. In fact, we’ve been doing digital manufacturing
in one form or another for nearly ten years. We hired an
industry-respected 3D specialist to help put the rest of our systems
together – to marry the software, the hardware and the application
into one workable system. Since then, we’ve continued to add to
the research and development team, which has grown to 53 people
and comprises scientists, chemists and engineers.
In the first year, we gave the digital manufacturing team a
really big research budget – around $1 million. We decided we
were going to spend it all on the equipment and systems we
needed. We have had breakthrough after breakthrough. We’ve
been very, very fast because our specialists do not have to go to
a committee looking for approval. We’re not a publicly owned
corporation where we have to drain profits. Our commitment to
R&D and digital manufacturing has distinguished us, and we’ve
grown very, very rapidly.
You’ve also opened up new departments at
Glidewell, like implants. When and why did you
decide to jump into the implant market? How
has it impacted your business? Glidewell: Our “jump” back into the implant market was
spawned by new technology. Before new technology improved
predictability and patient outcome, there were too many risks
involved in implantology. However, thanks to today’s digital
treatment planning technology, cone beam scans and surgical
templates, planning the outcome of an individual case is more
promising than ever before. We have a great team at the lab that
collectively has worked in the dental implant market for many
years, and it is their experience that is helping to ensure the success
of our implant services at Glidewell Laboratories.
How has customer relations changed/improved
over the past few years? Glidewell: First, we have always had a “live” person answering
every call that comes into the lab. We don’t have an answering
machine that routes calls to the right department. A dentist’s
time is valuable, and we don’t want to waste it. Providing outstanding
service is and will always be our top priority. The goal
for our customer service team is to be knowledgeable and
empowered to make decisions that satisfy the needs of the customer quickly so the dentist can move on with his or her day.
Clear communication from management along with continuous
education of staff ensures that we can meet these goals.
How do you reassure your dentist customers
that they’re receiving “the best restorations
money can buy?”
Glidewell: It really comes down to the perceived value of
what the customer believes. If we can exceed our customer’s
expectations for quality and service, they are receiving the best
restorations money can buy.
How do you obtain customer feedback and what
do you do with that information? Glidewell: We use CIA, or Critical Incidence Analysis, of
our customers’ verbal and written feedback to manage this information.
Verbal feedback is gathered during daily conversations
with our customers and written feedback is received through email.
We compile this feedback into a weekly report for executive
and production staff. Any negative issues or poor feedback is normally
resolved on the spot or by the time of report distribution.
Each case also has an evaluation slip attached to the invoice.
Customers are able to grade each restoration and return the
information to the lab. This written feedback reflects directly on
the customers’ work orders for future cases and provides a report
on each individual technician’s quality. The report is also used to
identify weak quality areas so that additional training can be
implemented, if needed, for improvement.
To what do you attribute Glidewell Laboratories’
success and achievements?
Glidewell: That we are meeting our customers and employees
needs by focusing on growth. A company that continues to
grow will always retain its best performers. We
also focus on innovation, research and development,
marketing, keeping our employees satisfied,
trying to anticipate what dentist customers
are going to need this year, next year and five
years from now. We work at right sizing every
department of our organization. We want to have
good balance in all operating systems. That means
every department needs to be strong; not just
strong in ceramics, but also removables, implants,
zirconia. Never treat a department as a loss leader
and give it less than 100 percent effort. If you run
a less than great department, that’s what you will be known for – your weaknesses, not your strengths. Remember, bad news travels
far and fast, and good news travels very slowly, if at all! In fact,
if I had a weak department today, without a firm conviction that
I could improve it tomorrow, I think it would be best to shut it
down rather than being known by that department’s reputation.
What are the three most important things you
would like to improve (still doing) to get an effective
communication between lab and dentist?
Glidewell: The future dental lab will use 3D imaging systems
to video conference with dentists in real time with real pictures.
This will eliminate mistakes and also give patients a better
overall product. Intraoral scanning will eliminate errors and
result in a better fitting prosthesis. More accuracy will come
from eliminating silicone impression materials and die stones.
Plus, good CAM systems will ensure a level of quality that does
not vary like that of today’s technicians. It seems as if today,
every technician wants to put their own personal style on a
restoration – not always with the best outcomes. Some are good,
even great; but in the future, the average will be higher.
Outcomes will be more predictable. We do not do digital imaging
because it does not give an accurate representation of what
will realistically work for the patient (unlike a diagnostic wax-up
on their own models). The future that I envision would make
prosthetic appliances more affordable and bring more patients
into good oral health. Today, many patients are locked out of
dentistry because of the high costs. As a profession, we must find
ways to make dentistry more affordable and accessible.
To learn more about Glidewell Laboratories,
please visit www.glidewelldental.com, or call
800-854-7256. |