A team approach with Oral Design
specialists for full-mouth rehab
and bite management
by Dr. John Heimke
Today’s cultural and social norms
greatly influence the universal
perception of a beautiful,
aesthetically pleasing smile.1
A bright, white, defect-free smile is
considered an indication of good
health and youth, while a smile that
exhibits discolored, chipped, worn
or missing teeth reflects aging and
neglect. Over a lifetime, teeth are naturally
exposed to numerous corrosive
and physical influences as well as
parafunctional habits that negatively
not only affect the color and shape of
the teeth but also can lead to various
forms of tooth wear that can adversely
affect the patient’s general health and
quality of life.2
Often, patients exhibiting tooth
wear are asymptomatic because of the
slow pace of the disease and a lack of
symptoms such as tooth sensitivity,
headaches or other related indicators.
Consequently, these patients most
often present for treatment because of
aesthetic or functionality concerns.3
They have become very aware of physical
changes affecting the nature of
their smile, such as shortened anterior
teeth, tooth discoloration or a general
dissatisfaction or change in their ability
to chew efficiently. For adults in the
workforce, deterioration of dental aesthetics
has a significant social impact
on how they perceive themselves and
are perceived by others.
The case reported here involves a
prominent dental professional who
was concerned about the wear on his
maxillary anterior teeth and the aesthetic
effects of his shortened teeth on
his smile. After a thorough examination,
it was determined that his worn
anterior teeth were an indicator of a
more serious problem.
Case report
A healthy 54-year-old patient presented
to the practice concerned with
the aesthetics of his smile. His major
concern was the lack of tooth display
when smiling (Fig. 1) and general lackluster
appearance of his teeth. Because
he interacted with patients on a daily
basis, it was important to him that
the youthfulness and aesthetics of his smile be
restored.
Fig. 1
The patient
reported no
pain, tooth
sensitivity
or other
symptoms.
Upon initial
examination,
occlusal wear was noted on all teeth,
along with multiple areas of abfraction
and tooth wear at the necks of the
teeth in both arches (Fig. 2).4–6 Tooth
#14 was missing, with the appearance
of significant bone loss, and Teeth #30
and #19 exhibited mobility as well as
signs of occlusal stress and needed to
be extracted. There was also moderate
crowding in the anterior lower arch.
Fig. 2
With the patient exhibiting occlusal
signs of dysfunction, a comprehensive
diagnostic screening was undertaken
to determine if the loss of anterior
guidance and cuspid rise was the
causative factor. X-rays confirmed
severe bone loss at the sites of missing/
extracted Teeth #14, #19 and
#30. A series of preoperative photos
(Figs. 3–7) were taken, along with
full-face and retracted videos of the
patient going through dynamic border
movements to assess dynamic motion
and function. In this case, the canines
had lost their protective cusp, allowing
the back teeth to occlude during
all the chewing phases.
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
A key point in restoring vertical
dimension is to take preoperative distance
measurements using calipers—in this case from Tooth #7 to #26 to
guide the postoperative goal of opening
vertical dimension of occlusion
(VDO) by 2 mm, restoring the occlusal
relationship and the aesthetics of
his smile.7–11 The preoperative findings
were shared with the patient to
demonstrate the need for a full-mouth
rehabilitation using the “smile artist”
approach of an Oral Design dentist
and master ceramist to restore normal
function and meet his demand for an
aesthetic smile.12
Treatment plan and
diagnostic wax-up
The treatment plan presented was
to extract Teeth #30 and #19 and
place zirconia three-unit bridges on
#13–#15, #18–#20 and #29–#31, all-ceramic
crowns on Teeth #6–#12 and
#28, and zirconia crowns on #3–#5.
All-ceramic veneers were prescribed
for teeth #21–#27. The digital photos
were uploaded into smile design software
(SmileFy) to create a 3D smile
design to share with the patient for
case acceptance and with the laboratory
as a blueprint for the final case
outcome (Figs. 8–9).
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Silicone impressions (Silginat,
Kettenbach Dental) were taken of
both arches and sent to the laboratory,
along with all diagnostic
records including X-rays, preoperative
photos, videos and 3D smile
design, as well as bite registration
(Futar D, Kettenbach) and
facebow photographs.
The laboratory created an analog
diagnostic waxup of the final case
outcome for clinical approval.
Note: Although the patient
expressed a desire for implants to
replace the three missing teeth and
was referred to an oral surgeon for
treatment, bone grafting did not
achieve the bone height needed for
implant placement. It was decided to
instead move forward with preparing
and provisionalizing the case
during this phase, with placement of
the bridges delayed until a decision
on the possibility of implants
was finalized.
Preparation and provisionalization
To control the final aesthetics and
establish the occlusal plane, it was
decided to begin restorative treatment
on the anterior teeth of the
lower arch.13 To provide the patient
with the desired strength and aesthetics
needed, as well as a material
that could be pressed to minimal
thickness that some teeth in this case
required, we decided to use lithium
disilicate (IPS E.max Press, Ivoclar)
and zirconia (IPS E.max ZirCad
Prime, Ivoclar).
The patient was anesthetized
and retracted (Optragate, Ivoclar).
The lower anterior arch was prepared
for veneers on Teeth #21–#27
and an all-ceramic crown on #28.
A stump-shade photo of the preparations
(Fig. 10) was taken for communication
with the laboratory. The
prepared teeth were then spot-etched
(Total Etch, Ivoclar), a bonding material
applied (Adhese, Ivoclar) and the
putty matrix filled with self-curing
provisional material shade BL (LuxaTemp,
Ivoclar). After four minutes,
the putty matrix (Lab Putty, Kettenbach)
was removed, excess material
trimmed, tooth shapes refined and
margins adjusted. The provisonals
were shaped and finalized (Fig. 11).
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
One week later, the patient returned
to the practice for a postoperative
appointment to evaluate the function
and aesthetics of the provisionals and
make any necessary adjustments.
In collaboration with Oral Design
master ceramist Peter Kouvaris, it
was determined that shade OM3
Natural (Vita 3D Master, Vita) would
be used for the final restorations.
Three weeks later, the final veneers
for Teeth #21–#27 and the crown for
#28 were delivered and seated. At the
same appointment, the upper maxillary
teeth were prepared; bites were taken and the new VDO verified with
calipers. Retraction cord and pellets
(Retrax Hemostatic Pellets, Pascal
Dental) were placed, then removed,
and the preparations rinsed and dried.
Final impressions (Identium Heavy
and Light, Kettenbach) were made
of the prepared teeth and photos
taken of the stump shade (Fig. 12) for
communication with the laboratory.
The maxillary teeth were temporized
using the same provisional protocol
(Figs. 13 and 14).
Teeth #13–#15, #18–#20 and
#29–#31 were then prepared for fixed
bridges and provisionalized. The overall
aesthetics of the smile was then
evaluated, phonetics verified and
occlusal contacts checked (Fig. 15).
The patient was advised to wear the
provisionals for two weeks. At the end
of two weeks, the patient reported
back to the practice, pleased with the
aesthetics and functionality of the provisional restorations. Photographs,
a video and final impressions of the
provisionalized patient were taken for
communication with the laboratory
for delivery of the final restorations.
Fig. 15
Delivery
The patient returned four weeks later
for seating of the final restorations.
The patient was retracted (Optragate)
and the temporaries were gently
removed. Before final bonding, an
aesthetic try-in paste (Variolink
Esthetic, Ivoclar) was applied to select
final restorations to verify shade,
then cleaned and dried. Then, the
prepared teeth were acid-etched and
an adhesive was applied (Adhese)
and light-cured for 20 seconds. Each
restoration was cleaned (Ivoclean)
and a primer applied (Monobond Etch
and Prime, Ivoclar). Luting composite
shade Light (Variolink Esthetic) was
applied to each restoration and seated.
A brush was used to remove any excess
material, and then each restoration was
tacked and cured (FlashLite Magna 4.0,
Denmat). An ultra-fine ET diamond
(Komet, Brasseler) was used to clean
the margins and a separating strip
(Komet) used to clean the proximals
of any material and adjust occlusion.
Rubber porcelain polishing points
(OptraFine, Ivoclar) were used to final-polish
each restoration.
The patient was pleased with the
highly aesthetic outcome (Figs. 16–20)
and was provided a lower-arch
nightguard.
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Conclusion
This complex full-mouth rehabilitation
resulted in a successful outcome using
an Oral Design team protocol. The
dentist and master ceramist team work
in a predictable workflow protocol
using the “Face to Teeth” 2D digital
smile design, then 3D-prototyping the
smile with the patient test-driving the
aesthetics and function of the proposed
design before a master ceramist uses
his or her specific skill sets to fabricate
the final porcelain restorations.
Today the workflow for this type
of dentistry is rapidly evolving into
using layered digital files, such as
3D face scans, intraoral scans and
digital face bows, and meshing those
files with lab design software to
generate 3D-printed prototypes for
milled wax copings for pressing or
milling lithium disilicate and zirconia
final restorations. Combined with
the human touch of an analog “smile
artist,” the final restorations come alive
with a skilled master ceramist shaping,
microlayering, staining and glazing the
restorations to a final result.
References
1. Ruefnacht C. Fundamentals of Esthetics. Hanover Park, IL:
Quintessence Pub. 1990.
2. Farzin M, Giti R, Heidari E. “Age-related changes in tooth
dimensions in adults in Shiraz, Iran.” J Int Oral Health [serial
online] 2020 [cited 2023 Nov 12]; 12, Suppl S1:24–29.
3. Bartlett D, O’Toole S. “Tooth wear: Best evidence consensus
statement.” J Prosthodont. 2020 Dec 17. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13312.
Epub ahead of print.
4. Tunkiwala A. “The worn and eroded dentition: Etiology, risk
assessment and treatment considerations.” Journal of Cosmetic
Dentistry, 2020; 36(1):50.
5. Wazani B, Dodd M, Milosevic A. “The signs and symptoms of
tooth wear in a referred group of patients.”Br Dent J. 2012 Sep;
213(6):E10.
6. Gkantidis N, Dritsas K, Gebistorf M, Halazonetis D, Ren Y,
Katsaros C. “Longitudinal 3D study of anterior tooth wear from
adolescence to adulthood in modern humans.” Biology (Basel).
2021 Jul 13; 10(7):660.
7. Abduo J, Lyons K. “Clinical considerations for increasing
occlusal vertical dimension: a review.” Australian Dental Journal,
2012 57: 2–10.
8. Muts E-J, van Pelt H, Edelho D, Krejci I. “Tooth wear: A
systematic review of treatment options.” Journal of Prosthetic
Dentistry (2014), 112(4):752–759.
9. Mehta SB, Banerji S, Millar BJ, Suarez-Feito JM. “Current
concepts on the management of tooth wear: Part 4. An overview
of the restorative techniques and dental materials commonly
applied for the management of tooth wear.” Br Dent J. 2012 Feb
24; 212(4):169–177.
10. Banerji, S., Mehta, S. “Clinical management of pathological tooth
wear in general dental practice.” Br Dent J 220, 209–210 (2016).
11. Turner KA, Missirlian DM. “Restoration of the extremely worn
dentition.” J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Oct; 52(4):467–74.
12. Ruiz, J-L., “Diagnosing and educating patients about occlusal
disease.” Inside Dentistry, 2014. 10(1).
13. “Sequencing a Full Mouth Rehab: Anterior or Posteriors First?,”
The Dawson Academy Blog.
Dr. John Heimke, who has more than
30 years of experience in cosmetic
and implant dentistry, now practices in Cleveland. Heimke earned a DMD
at Case Western Reserve University
School of Dental Medicine in Cleveland
and an MPH from Emory University in
Atlanta, and completed an advanced
education program in general dentistry
at Fort Benning, Georgia, while
serving as a captain in the U.S. Army
medical department.
Heimke is a fellow of the Academy
of General Dentistry and the Pierre
Fauchard Academy, and a member of the
Oral Design International Foundation.
A Digital Smile Design master and
instructor, he also lectures on cosmetic
dentistry, digital/analog dentistry
workflows, full-arch implants, marketing,
and consults and case acceptance.