Astra Tech
Astra Tech Dental Implants offer unrivaled documented results for maintaining marginal bone integrity and soft tissue health, with several features that work together to help prevent bone loss and ensure implant stability after placement. To maintain bone, the neck of the Astra Tech dental implant stimulates surrounding bone with Micro-Thread retention elements – tiny threads that offer optimal load distribution and lower stress values. For more information, visit www.astratech.com. |
Bicon Dental Implants
Since 1985, the Bicon Dental Implant System has offered dentists a proven solution for missing dentition. The Bicon implant design comprises plateaus, sloping shoulders and a bacterially-sealed, 1.5° locking taper implant to abutment connection. These unique features allow for the routine use of 6.0mm short implants and the revolutionary Integrated Abutment Crown (IAC). For more information, call 800-882-4266 or visit www.bicon.com. |
BioHorizons
BioHorizons offers several types of dental implants including internal hex, external hex, overdenture, one-piece implants and tapered internal. The Tapered Internal Implants incorporate the Laser-Lok precision laser collar surface treatment, which controls cellular growth and directs hard and soft tissue attachment onto dental implants. For more information, visit www.biohorizons.com. |
Biomet 3i
Biomet 3i offers a comprehensive line of dental implants that incorporate advanced surface technologies (NanoTite Implants) and configurations. These include integrated platform switching (PREVAIL Implants), Tapered Implants, internal and external connections and parallel walled configurations. For clinicians who want their practices to be at the forefront of implant dentistry, Biomet 3i has proven itself to be a company of choice. For more information, call 800-342-5454 or visit www.biomet3i.com. |
CAMLOG Biotechnologies
The CAMLOG System facilitates the most stable and dependable restorations that won't shift over time, due to its patented 3- cam system. Typically, other systems fail due to stress at connection points. The CAMLOG System distributes pressure evenly, down the elongated implant body. Extremely easy to use both surgically and restoratively, in restorations, CAMLOG also gives the patient greater flexibility in prosthetic decisions. For more information, visit camlogimplants.com or call 877-537-8862. |
DENTSPLY Tulsa Dental
In clinical use since 1987, the ANKYLOS Implant System is made from non-coated
pure titanium. The ANKYLOS plus Implants are packaged in a double vial (the inner
vial being sterile), for contact-free handling. The cover screw is incorporated
in the implant and is only removed prior to placing a sulcus former or abutment.
For more information, call 800-662-1202 or visit www.tulsadental.com. |
Implant Direct, LLC
Implant Direct's Spectra-System represents a quantum leap in implant design by including six implants with the same body design and dimensions, designed with different platforms targeted to different clinical applications. Implant Direct's business strategy includes providing all-in-one packaging for most of its implants (implant, abutment, healing collar, transfers) and to sell factory-direct through the Internet. For more information, visit www.implantdirect.com. |
IMTEC, a 3M Company
In addition to the ENDURE and Hexed-Head Implant Systems, IMTEC's line of implants also includes the Sendax MDI. The IMTEC Sendax Mini Dental Implant (MDI) consists of a miniature 1.8mm titanium/alloy implant that acts like the root of a tooth and a retaining fixture containing an o-ring that is incorporated into the base of a patient's denture. For more information, visit www.imtec.com. |
MIS Implants
MIS has grown rapidly in the United States and is expanding due to its innovative surgical and implant product lines. MIS connections are interchangeable with certain other companies' systems; each implant comes with a sterile, single use final drill and abutment kit containing all necessary restorative components. For more information, visit www.misimplants.com. |
Neoss, Inc.
Neoss provides the ideal balance between efficacy, efficiency and economy by offering an innovative, evidence-based dental implant system with around 100 components. Experience the Neoss advantage: one prosthetic connection, one impression coping, one prosthetic solution. Neoss helps you exceed your patient's expectations. For more information, visit www.neoss.com. |
Nobel Biocare
All Nobel Biocare implants are backed by extensive R&D and years of use to ensure optimal success with implant-retained rehabilitations. The unique root-like shape of Nobel Biocare's tapered implant family provides superb initial stability, makes drilling simpler and placement easier. For more information, visit www.nobelbiocare.com. |
OCO Biomedical, Inc
With single-stage surgical placement
that allows for immediate load/function, OCO Biomedical's patent-pending one- and two-piece Dual Stabilization, and one-piece I-Mini Dental Implant Systems mean higher patient satisfaction and greater revenues for dentists. The bullnose/ auger tip creates a true mechanical lock at the apex of the implant, ensuring immediate stability and superior osseointegration. For more information, visit
www.ocobiomedical.com. |
Sterngold
The ERA Implant System which can be used both temporarily and permanently is unique due to its micro prosthetic head, ability to correct misangulation, and its true vertical resiliency. In fact, the ERA Implant is the only vertically resilient implant in the world that can immediately stabilize a removable prosthesis. For more information, visit www.sterngold.com or call 800-243-9942. |
Straumann USA, LLC
The Straumann Dental Implant
System offers a number of implant lines for the successful treatment of all surgical and prosthetic indications in oral implantology. The newest generation Bone Level Implant comes in three diameters and four lengths. There is a full matching prosthetic portfolio comprising 125 components and also a CAD/CAM custom abutment service in titanium and ceramic. For more information, visit www.straumann.com. |
Thommen Medical USA
The SPI System offers implants suitable for subgingival and transgingival placement, and which feature the same platform design and sizes to make prosthetic component selection and preparation straightforward. A diverse range of prosthetic components, including cemented and screw-retained solutions, allows the clinician to plan and deliver restorations with an ideal harmony of high-level aesthetics and reliable function. For more information, visit www.thommenmedical.com or call
866-319-9800. |
Town & Country
Dental Studios
SIMPL from Town & Country Dental Studios, utilizes Atlantis CAD/CAM abutments for greater accuracy and a better result. SIMPL also eliminates the need for implant parts, makes cases easy to estimate, and provides the ability to restore cases in as little as two 15-minute restorative appointments. This protocol works with most implant fixtures and is fully warranted. For more information, call 800-925-8696 or visit www.betterimplants.com. |
Zest Anchors, Inc.
The LOCATOR Implant Attachment is designed to reduce the height of abutment restoration on all brands of endosseous implants and features a denture component with self-aligning ability to aid the patient in seating their prosthesis. In addition, a combination of inside and outside retention provides the LOCATOR Implant attachment with up to 60,000 cycles of attachment function. For more information, call 800-262-2310 or visit www.zestanchors.com. |
Zimmer Dental Inc.
Delivering fully integrated one-stage
and two-stage solutions, one-piece implants and the latest in aesthetics, the Tapered Screw-Vent Implant System offers the versatility to meet a multitude of clinical needs. Forming the basis of the system is the Tapered Screw-Vent Implant, which features Zimmer's proprietary internal hex connection with lead-in bevel. For more information, visit www.zimmerdental.com or call 800-854-7019. |
|
How did your company become involved in developing implants?
Rodriguez (Astra Tech): Astra Tech was established in 1948 and started out as a wholesaler of hospital products. In 1978 the company transformed into a medical device manufacturer with highly qualified in-house research and development resources. From that point on we have had a clear focus on the development of advanced products and concepts for the dental and health care sectors. As a company in the AstraZeneca Group, access to resources and experiences in the field of research and documentation, as well as those disciplines connected with legal, environment and patent issues is ensured.
Strong (BioHorizons): BioHorizons was founded in 1994 as an incubator company at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). BioHorizons became involved in the development of implants through Biomechanical research conducted at UAB in conjunction with top clinicians. All of our implants have been developed as a result of years of scientific and clinical research.
Bonafede (Biomet 3i): Biomet 3i was founded in 1987 and we started initially by providing restorative components to the dental implant community. It just seemed a natural evolution for us to get involved with implants so that we could offer clinicians a total solution.
Niznick (Implant Direct): I have a 27-year history in the dental implant industry dating back to 1982 Core-Vent and 1997 Paragon Implant companies. Paragon was sold to what is now Zimmer Dental in 2001 and in 2005, I started Implant Direct in the factory I had been leasing to Zimmer and hired 80 of my former design engineers and machinists to develop a new system of application specific implants called Spectra-System. My new concept was to provide one implant body with six abutment options included in all-in-one packaging.
Harvey (IMTEC): Dr. Ronald A. Bulard, CEO of IMTEC, a 3M Company, realizing in the 1980s that the cost of implants was high, developed a plan that focused on cost effective quality implants for the international dental community. When IMTEC introduced small diameter MDIs in the late 1990s, this cost-effective business model combined with minimally invasive implantology struck a chord with the dental community.
Weisman/Wilford (MIS): In 1995 two dentists requested custom screws for the dental implant system they were currently using. This was the beginning of the thought process into the design and execution of manufacturing dental implants. We first manufactured for different brands, but since 1996 have been manufacturing only the MIS brand of implant systems.
Dalise (OCO Biomedical): OCO Biomedical began by developing and patenting the O-Ring Attachment systems primarily to attach sub periosteals to overdentures in the early 1970s. The O-Ring System was the first reproducible system, rather than a lab technician's work of art that could not be reproduced for replacing worn dentures at a later time. Some companies actually licensed our patent so they could produce them. As it turned out, the O-Ring attachment system is still probably the most widely used attachment system for attaching overdentures worldwide, and the most user friendly and cost efficient for patient and dentist.
Ellison (Sterngold): Sterngold started out developing products for dental restoration – primarily alloys and attachments. This focus on attachments lead us to create implant abutments to help in the restoration of many types of implants. The first was the ERA Implant Abutment in 1990. The success of this abutment lead us to purchase the ImplaMed implant company in 1993. With that move Sterngold became a manufacturer and seller of what are today called traditional implants. The company's expansion into this growing area of dentistry led to a number of new products. In 1999 the popularity of the ERA Attachment System was combined with a screw implant to fill a significant need in dentistry. The ERA Implant was designed to make it simpler and less expensive to restore an edentulous patient with an overdenture. The potential benefit to the public is the elimination of millions of ill-fitting and uncomfortable complete dentures.
Foster (Town & Country): Town & Country Dental Studios was one of the first Branemark implant laboratories in the United States. Over the last 40 years we remained on the forefront of implant technologies for the benefit of our doctors. Zuest (Zest Anchors): Zest Anchors, Inc., manufactured the ZAAG Implant Attachment starting in 1994 to fit all dental implant systems available at that time.
What does your implant system offer to make restorations predictable?
Zuest (Zest Anchors): The Locator Implant Attachment is manufactured
to fit all major brands of dental implants.
Foster (Town & Country): We developed our simplified implant restoration protocol (SIMPL) to help doctors restore more implants in less time and with less stress. Our patent-pending protocol does not require any implant parts from the doctor. Our one-fee pricing takes guesswork out of estimating cases. Our verification jigs and abutment placement jigs help avoid most of the problems with restoring implants, providing a better clinical result in a very predictable protocol.
Dalise (OCO Biomedical): It is simple, safe, and successful. We offer a direct technique, cutting down on surgical placement cost and time, and prosthetic restoration with costly lab bills. We also have an indirect technique and modified indirect which allows more involvement by the laboratory, but still allows the doctor to have some control and involvement once again reducing lab costs.
Weisman/Wilford (MIS): All of our implant systems have abutments borne from a prosthetic driven design. They are all manufactured in our own facility, which ensures consistency and we offer the best quality control that engineering can offer.
Strong (BioHorizons): A comprehensive line of prosthetics to fit the functional and aesthetic demands faced by today's clinicians.
Harvey (IMTEC): Because the MDI system focuses on overdentures, IMTEC offers the Celara system. The Celara technique is used by labs and doctors to make dentures predictable and profitable. With the proven and patented Celara technique, clinicians can eliminate custom trays and wax rims and get more predictable try-ins than ever before.
Niznick (Implant Direct): Implant Direct offers the industry's broadest selection of one- and two-piece implants with abutment included, simplifying ordering and saving significant costs. We also offer a full line of reasonably priced abutments compatible with Zimmer's Screw-Vent (developed by Dr. Niznick), BioHorizons internal connection and Straumann's internal Octagon (Both licensed under Dr. Niznick's patent), and Nobel's Tri-lobe connection.
Bonafede (Biomet 3i): All of our restorative components have a “click” feature. As you insert the restorative component into our Certain Implant, there's a tactile feel and an audible click that indicate when the restorative component is fully seated. It makes it a little easier to determine when the components are engaged correctly. We also have a wide variety of restorative components available; some of which are in standard configurations, some of which are patient specific or customized.
Rodriguez (Astra Tech): The unique Astra Tech BioManagement Complex ensures surgical and restorative predictability through the combination of four interdependent features of OsseoSpeed (the only fluoride-modified implant surface on the market today), MicroThread (minute threads at the implant neck that ensures positive biomechanical bone stimulation for maintained marginal bone levels), Conical Seal Design (tight and precise implant-abutment internal connection) and Connective Contour (increased connective soft tissue contact zone). In particular, the Conical Seal Design transfers the load deeper into the bone and thereby reduces peak stresses for preserved marginal bone. The self-guiding design allows for quick and simple abutment installation that eliminates the need for a radiographic confirmation of seating. Our range of cement-, screw- and attachment-retained abutment solutions also provide clinicians with the products that predictably meet their clinical needs for all locations in the mouth.
How can implant placement become more predictable?
Harvey (IMTEC): IMTEC offers an adjustable torque wrench that quantifies initial stability during implant placement so doctors will understand at the time of placement if they've encountered enough resistance to load an implant. The use of CT technology can tell a doctor far more than 2D diagnostics about bone density, anatomical structures and bone quantity.
Ellison (Sterngold): Proper education, a reasonable amount of skill, and use of computer generated surgical guides involving CT scans.
Strong (BioHorizons): Proper training of the clinician is essential. In addition, appropriate use of implant designs in the varying clinical and biomechanical conditions.
Rodriguez (Astra Tech): The key to increased implant placement predictability is the utilization of advanced imaging softwares that allow for the precise 3D visualization of the anatomy (including adjacent teeth, nerve locations, etc.) for accurate treatment planning. Surgical guides also allow for the planned treatment to be replicated in the actual surgical procedure. This is why Astra Tech offers Facilitate Computer Guided Implant Treatment.
Weisman/Wilford (MIS): Proper case selection will certainly help to improve the predictability of implant outcomes. Comprehensive treatment planning with all clinicians involved will also help to minimize less than optimal results.
Zuest (Zest Anchors): With improved coatings and designs.
Dalise (OCO Biomedical): With a total review of anatomy, total patient workup including panoramic and cone beam if necessary, study models, and the normal patient presurgical and prosthetic workup that any prudent doctor would do in a reconstructive case. This also includes reviewing the patient's medical history.
Bonafede (Biomet 3i): Technology can always help. Biomet 3i is producing surfaces that we believe result in greater bone to implant contact in shorter time periods such as NanoTite and we are also involved in new technologies such as surgical guidance through instrumentation and third-party software that allows a clinician to place an implant in exactly the same position as preplanned.
Niznick (Implant Direct): Image-guided surgery with treatment planning on CT radiographs will help solve the location issues in implant placement. Use of an evenly tapered implant inserted into a socket prepared with a straight drill of the appropriate diameter for either soft bone or dense bone will increase initial stability and eliminate the need for bone taps. Initial stability is the most critical issue to achieving osseointegration, especially if early or immediate load is being used. |
In your opinion will the costs associated with implant placement and restoration decline in the next five years?
Dalise (OCO Biomedical): Yes. The trend seems to be going towards immediate loading, one-piece implants and direct restorative techniques, which ultimately reduces time and lab costs. I can easily foresee patients having a single tooth replacement offered to them for the same cost or slightly more than a conventional three-unit bridge without violating sound, natural teeth.
Weisman/Wilford (MIS): It is reasonable to expect prices to decline over the next five years. Competition will be at least one of the factors for this phenomenon.
Zuest (Zest Anchors): The costs to the patient will stay about the same but insurance will help to cover more of the expense.
Ellison (Sterngold): Many new implant placers, including general dentists, will drive the inflated cost down to a realistic level. But implant restoration might not decline. The dentist and lab costs associated with implant restoration are, in most cases, not over inflated.
Strong (BioHorizons): In my opinion, the costs will stay at current levels.
Is there a particular restorative application (fixed/removable) that your company is known for?
Weisman/Wilford (MIS): MIS offers a full complement of restorative options, both fixed and removable. Our most popular is the simplest. It is our CPS (complete prosthetic set) kit, which includes a straight abutment, implant analog, wax burnouts and a comfort cap. This kit is available at no charge to dentists who purchase multiple implants.
Dalise (OCO Biomedical): We started the O-Ball Attachment System, but
our company has been known for innovation in the dental implant community since
its onset. We were also the first company to come out with a reliable, predictable,
one-piece root form implant (3.25mm, 4.0mm, and 5.0mm diameters), and a 3.0mm
one-piece implant that performs just as well as its larger diameter implant “brothers.”
Zuest (Zest Anchors): Zest Anchors, Inc., is known for being the manufacturer of the Locator Implant Attachment for removable overdentures.
Ellison (Sterngold): Implant Supported Overdentures, both with the ERA Implant (for small diameter applications) and the ERA Implant Abutments for many traditional implants. These removable applications are the most popular within the Sterngold product line.
Bonafede (Biomet 3i): I think probably one of the hottest technologies we have right now is the Encode Restorative System. This is where a dentist can create a final restoration by only taking a supragingival impression of a very specialized healing abutment. There are no other manufacturers offering this in the industry.
Strong (BioHorizons): We offer prosthetics that satisfy both fixed and removable restorative methods.
Harvey (IMTEC): The efficiency of MDIs as a denture stabilization system has led to IMTEC being very closely associated with implant retained removable prosthetics.
Niznick (Implant Direct): I invented the concept of versatile prosthetic
applications for implants in 1982 with the Core-Vent, an implant that accepted
six different cemented abutments. With the introduction of the internal hex/thread
and lead-in bevel connection, the modern era of implant prosthodontics was started.
Implant Direct has moved this concept to the next level by offering a variety
of one-piece implants with different prosthetic abutment platforms, including
the ScrewDirect with a straight head and a snap-on transfer capability and the
ScrewRedirect with an angled contoured head, both for cemented restorations;
the ScrewIndirect with a screw receiving head for detachable restorations, also
with a snap-on transfer capability; and the GoDirect with a head that accepts
Zest Locator attachments for overdenture retention.
Rodriguez (Astra Tech): In 2007, Astra Tech acquired Atlantis, the leading
provider of patient-specific, cement-retained abutments in the U.S. Atlantis
CAD/CAM abutments are provided through the utilization of a proprietary Atlantis
VAD (Virtual Abutment Design) software that designs the optimal abutment based
on the desired final tooth shape. Atlantis abutments simplify the overall restorative
process as it requires the restorative dentist to only take an implant-level
impression and send it on to their lab with a request for Atlantis. It also helps
to ensure the highest level of predictability because it uses computer intelligence
to guide the parameters of the abutment design.
Who should place implants?
Al-Faraje (California Implant Institute): General dentists should learn how to place their own implants because most often, when the specialists place the implants, the implants end up not where the restoring dentist wants them. Some oral surgeons and periodontists do not take the time to learn about implant prosthodontics and thus do not do a good job at the planning stage for the general dentists. The number, diameter and location of implants are usually specific to the type of prosthesis the patient will be ending up with.
Ellison (Sterngold): Any dentist who learns how to place them properly. But, to place them properly requires a strong knowledge of restorative dentistry. The best candidates are prosthodontists and well-skilled and educated general dentists.
Bonafede (Biomet 3i): Biomet 3i believes in the traditional referral model. That means a patient comes to see his general practitioner and can be referred for surgery to a surgical specialist – who could be an oral surgeon or a periodontist, for example. We are not saying that a general dentist cannot place implants, but the necessary and proper amount of training is required.
Dalise (OCO Biomedical): Any dentist who feels that he/she has the skill, confidence and ability to place implants, and the desire to develop those skills.
What is an appropriate amount of time to obtain the necessary skills for implant placement?
Bonafede (Biomet 3i): I don't think you can generally get the necessary
amount of training in a weekend course. I think the types of educational programs
that take more of a “continuum” approach where the general practitioner can,
over the course of a year or longer, take eight to 10 comprehensive full day
courses to learn the surgical side is more appropriate.
Dalise (OCO Biomedical): Unfortunately, God has not distributed the gift of skill equally to all professionals. Each dentist should assess that particular subject themselves. We all have a knack to do certain things in dentistry that we both enjoy and love. For some, it would be best to avoid what we don't do best.
Harvey (IMTEC): A general practitioner can learn to stabilize lower dentures with MDI Implants in a one- or two-day certification course. Successfully placing traditional implants requires substantially more training such as comprehensive implant courses, or
MAXI courses, which span 10 months with classes held on weekends.
Strong (BioHorizons): It depends on the skill level of the clinician.
Niznick (Implant Direct): Surgical specialists coming right out of graduate programs certainly have a head start because implant placement is now a required part of their curriculum. GPs taking a concentrated Maxi-course from the AAID or other organizations can get up to speed on a variety of skills needed for successful implant placement in a concentrated period of time. An important aspect of shortening ones implant apprenticeship is to do a number of cases early on for little or no fee to gain experience and confidence in a broad range of applications.
Why should/shouldn't general dentists get involved in placing implants?
Bonafede (Biomet 3i): If a general dentist is strongly motivated to place implants, then that's fine. I would recommend that they get the appropriate training, which should be more than just a weekend course. If they get the appropriate training and want to use Biomet 3i implants, we'll be more than happy to work with them.
Zuest (Zest Anchors): General dentists should start by restoring implant cases before surgically placing the implants themselves.
Strong (BioHorizons): The dental community is supporting general dentists training to place implants. Implant placement is now being taught in universities to students entering the field of general dentistry.
Weisman/Wilford (MIS): All dentists have an obligation to inform their patients of dental implants as a restorative option when appropriate. If properly trained, general dentists can successfully place implants, but if there is no interest on the part of the general dentist to become involved, that decision should be respected.
Rodriguez (Astra Tech): Whether or not a general dentist gets involved with the placement of implants should be dependent on their own goals and considerations for their practice and whether or not a surgical partner is readily available in the community that they service. However, a team approach is highly recommended and proven successful for all parties involved.
Ellison (Sterngold): Many general dentists will not want to get involved in placing implants. But, for those who have the skill and the desire to learn, placing implants can add to their profit while providing a necessary treatment to their patients at a more affordable cost. Also many patients will agree to implant treatment when they have the comfort of knowing that there regular dentist will perform the procedure as opposed to going to an unknown specialist. |