Perio
Reports Vol. 23 No. 4 |
Perio Reports provides easy-to-read research summaries on topics of specific interest to clinicians.
Perio Reports research summaries will be included in each issue to keep you on the cutting edge
of dental hygiene science.
|
SRP Beneficial for Those with
Type 2 Diabetes
There is a two-way relationship between diabetes and periodontal
disease. Uncontrolled diabetes is a risk factor for periodontitis
and untreated periodontitis will make controlling
diabetes more difficult. Based on these findings, periodontal
treatment should reduce elevated glycemic levels, however studies
show both a benefit and no benefit.
Researchers at the University of Athens in Greece monitored
a group of 60 patients with both Type 2 diabetes and moderate
to severe periodontitis for six months. Patients were evaluated at
one, three and six months for periodontal health and blood was
drawn for glycosylated hemoglobin (AIC) levels.
Half the group received scaling and root planing (SRP) at
baseline and the other half was treated at the end of the study. All
subjects were given oral hygiene instructions and the control
group received only supragingival plaque and calculus removal.
Bleeding on probing was reduced 38 percent in the test
group compared to four percent in the control group. All the
periodontal indices were significantly reduced for the group
receiving SRP compared to controls.
A very slight reduction in AIC levels was observed in the control
group compared to a significant reduction in the SRP group.
A reduction of 0.72 percent was seen in the SRP group compared
to 0.13 percent in the control group.
Clinical Implications: The primary reason to complete periodontal treatment is to improve oral health. For patients who also have Type 2 diabetes, SRP might also provide a favorable effect on glycemic control.
Koromantzos, P., Makrilakis, K., Dereka, X., Katsilambros, N.,
Vrotsos, I., Madianos, P.: A Randomized, Controlled Trial on the
Effect of Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Patients with Type 2
Diabetes. Part I: Effect on Periodontal Status and Glycaemic
Control. J Clin Perio 38: 142-147, 2011. |
|
The Use of Caries-preventive
Agents
Caries risk assessment protocols suggest the use
of in-office fluorides, sealants, prescription and nonprescription
fluorides, chlorhexidine rinses, and sugarless
or xylitol gums as techniques to prevent caries. Several
things keep clinicians from using and recommending these
agents for patients, including lack of knowledge of the
value, lack of financial reimbursement, prevention philosophy,
patient pools and overall caries risk. A written survey
was sent to members of the Dental Practice-Based
Research Network (DPBRN) to determine use of caries
preventive agents. The DPBRN includes three areas of private
and public health practices in Alabama/Mississippi,
Florida/Georgia and Denmark/Norway/Sweden SK; and
two large group practices networks in Minnesota – Health
Partners and PDA – Kaiser Permanante.
Surveys were sent to 932 network practices with 509
usable surveys returned from 419 male and 90 female
practitioners with 98 percent being in general practice.
Questions were asked about preventive services and recommendations
for patients six to 18 years of age.
Use of caries risk assessment by DPBRN practices
was reported in 75 percent. In-office fluoride treatments
were used most often by 82 percent of practices, followed
by sealants in 69 percent. Sugarless or xylitol
chewing gum was recommended by 36 percent of practices,
with non-prescription fluoride at 32 percent and
prescription fluoride at 21 percent. The least recommended
preventive agent was at home chlorhexidine.
Clinical Implications: Preventive measures are used, but perhaps not as widely or as often as they could be to reduce the current level of caries in children.
Riley, J., Richman, S., Rindal, B., Fellows, J., Qvist, V.,
Gilbert, G., Gordan, V.: Use of Caries-Preventive Agents
in Children: Findings from the Dental Practice-Based
Research Network. Oral Health Prev Dent 8: 351-
359, 2010. |
|
|
CloSYS Mouthrinse Kills Bacteria
Mouth rinses are often recommended for both preventive
and post-treatment care to control oral bacteria. The gold
standard rinse is chlorhexidine (CHX), but compliance is
compromised by the taste alterations and tooth
staining associated with this product. Other
rinses are recommended that are not quite as
effective as CHX yet still have strong tastes and
the potential for tooth staining.
A researcher at the University of Iowa tested
six mouth rinses against 15 different bacterial
species associated with the oral cavity. Mouth rinses
tested included: CloSYS, Listerine, Crest
Pro-Health, Breath Rx and Peridex.
Bacterial samples were grown in culture and then exposed
to the mouth rinses for one and five minutes to determine the
kill rate of each solution.
All the rinses tested killed Aa bacteria within one minute.
Four bacterial species were killed by all the rinses at five minutes.
Listerine was the most effective, killing all bacteria at
one minute. Crest Pro-Health killed all but one bacteria at
one minute and that one at five minutes. Peridex killed five
bacterial species at one minute and all at five minutes.
CloSYS killed three bacterial species at one minute, 11
species at five minutes and left four species
reduced. BreathRx killed four bacterial species
at one minute, nine species by five minutes
leaving six species reduced.
CloSYS rinse contains stabilized chlorine
dioxide and is available over the counter. It can
be used without any flavor or flavor can be
added by the user. Tooth staining is not caused
by CloSYS rinse.
Clinical Implications: CloSYS might be an alternative to mouth rinses that have strong tastes or stain the teeth, as it demonstrates a significant antibacterial effect.
Drake, D.: An In Vitro Comparative Study Determining
Bactericidal Activity of Stabilized Chlorine Dioxide and Other
Oral Rinses. J Clin Dent 22: 1-5, 2011. |
|
Various CHX Formulations Produce Stain
Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the gold standard for effective control
of oral bacteria. Various concentrations are available, some
with and some without alcohol.
Researchers at the University of Zürich in Switzerland
evaluated a new formulation of CHX called Parodentosan, a
0.05 percent CHX rinse containing sage, menthol, myrrh
and 15 percent ethanol. They compared it to three control
solutions, CHX 0.05 percent with 15 percent alcohol, CHX
0.2 percent with 15 percent alcohol and 0.2 percent without
alcohol.
Two laboratory tests were done, the first evaluated effects on
bacterial biofilm and the second measured staining potential on
both tooth and restorative surfaces. Hydroxyapatite discs were
used to grow an oral biofilm. The discs were then exposed to
test and control solutions at six time points within 48 hours.
The biofilm-covered discs were then incubated and harvested at
64 hours.
Bovine enamel and dentin samples were used in the staining
test, plus micro-filled and non-filled composites and a
glass ceramic material. The test materials were bathed in
human saliva first, then rinsed with de-ionized water, followed
by the CHX rinses. Several CHX rinses were performed, with
water between.
The control CHX solutions were all effective in reducing
biofilm growth by six log steps or almost completely. The CHX
plus essential oils was less effective, reducing biofilm formation
by three log steps.
All of the test and control CHX solutions produced stains,
with the most pronounced stain on dentin followed by enamel
and the restorative materials.
Clinical Implications: Attempts to reduce CHX staining reduced effectiveness of the product.
Hofer, D., Meier, A., Sener, B., Guggenheim, B., Attin, T.,
Schmidlin, P.: Biofilm Reduction and Staining Potential of a
0.05% Chlorhexidine Rinse Containing Essential Oils. Int J Dent
Hygiene 9: 60-67, 2011. |
|
Licorice Lollipops Reduce Strep Mutans
in High-risk Kids
High levels of Strep mutans in plaque and saliva
predict current and future caries. Interventions that
reduce the level of Strep mutans are needed to effectively
prevent caries. Licorice root extract has the
potential to kill Strep mutans. An extract of the
licorice root is now used in candies for children to
prevent tooth decay. Researchers at the University
of Michigan in Ann Arbor carried out a pilot study
to determine if lollipops containing licorice root
extract could reduce Strep mutans levels in preschool
children.
A total of 66 children two to five years of age enrolled in a Head Start
Program, participated in the study. Strep mutans levels were determined at baseline
with saliva samples identifying 12 low, 37 moderate and 17 high-risk children.
Lollipops were provided twice daily for three weeks, under supervision of
classroom teaching staff. The children sat at tables or in story circles to ensure
their safety while consuming the lollipops. Educational material and suggested
activities were provided to the teaching staff. Salivary testing was repeated prior
to lollipops on days 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 21, 25 and weekly for nine more weeks.
Strep mutans levels were reduced most significantly for the high-risk children,
bringing them to a moderate level of risk during the study. Strep mutans reductions were measured out to 22 days after the study ended, at which time
the Strep mutans levels began to rebound.
Clinical Implications: These findings suggest a simple effective caries-prevention approach that should be investigated further with randomized controlled trials.
Peters, M., Tallman, J., Braun, T., Jacobson, J.: Clinical Reduction of S. Mutans
in Pre-School Children Using a Noevel Liquorice Root Extract Lollipop: A Pilot
Study. Eur Arch Pediatr Dent 11: 274-278, 2010. |
|
Hyaluronic Acid – New Mouthrinse Ingredient
Hyaluronic acid, also known as hyaluronan is a polysaccharide with a high molecular
weight. It is a binding agent for connective tissue, providing stability and elasticity. Hyaluronic
acid is involved in the early stages of wound healing, enhances tissue regeneration and is
involved with bone regeneration. New information suggests it has anti-inflammatory and antibacteria
effects by seeking and destroying MMPs and prostaglandins, important inflammatory
mediators. Its antioxidant actions make it a good choice for the treatment of osteoarthritis and
rheumatoid arthritis.
Researchers at SDM College of Dental
Sciences and Hospital in Karnataka, India
compared a 0.025 percent hyaluronic acid
mouthrinse (Gengigel, made in Italy) to a
0.2 percent chlorhexidine (CHX) rinse
and a flavored water control. Gengigel also
contains xylitol, which reduces bacterial
plaque levels.
In laboratory studies, the CHX was
the most effective in killing Aa, Pg and Pi.
Gengigel was effective against Aa and Pi,
but not Pg. The water control had no
effect against any of the bacteria.
Part II of the research was a four-day
mouthrinse study with 45 dental student
volunteers. After baseline plaque and bleeding
scores, all deposits were removed to
establish plaque-free mouths. Students were
randomly assigned to groups instructed to
refrain from all oral hygiene and gum chewing
and instead rinse twice daily with their
assigned mouthrinse.
Those using the water control had
significantly more plaque than the CHX
and Gengigel rinse groups. Bleeding scores
before and after were similar between
all groups.
Clinical
Implications: Although not available in the U.S. at this time, we might one day have a hyaluronic acid mouthrinse.
Rodrigues, S., Acharya, A., Bhadbhade, S.,
Thakur, S.: Hyaluronan-Containing Mouthwash
as an Adjunctive Plaque-Control Agent.
Oral Health Prev Dent 8: 389-394, 2010. |
|