Perio
Reports Vol. 22 No. 2 |
Perio Reports provides easy-to-read research summaries on topics of specific interest to clinicians.
Perio Reports research summaries will be included in each issue to keep you on the cutting edge
of dental hygiene science.
|
Toothbrushing time is important
Despite the fact that periodontal disease begins between
the teeth, toothbrushing remains the primary method of
oral hygiene. However people do not spend adequate time
brushing. Average toothbrushing time is between 30 and
60 seconds.
Researchers for GlaxoSmithKline in collaboration with
Hill Top Research in Cincinnati, Ohio, compared various
brushing times to see if plaque removal related to the time
spent brushing. The adult subjects participated in six timed
and supervised brushing sessions on different days. Brushing
times tested were 30, 45, 60, 120 and 180 seconds. Subjects
were randomly assigned to each of the brushing times and the
clinic supervisor informed the person at the start of brushing
of the time to be measure and also let them know when each
quarter of the time elapsed. Aquafresh manual toothbrushes
and Aquafresh toothpaste were used, with 1.5 grams of toothpaste
put on a new brush for each subject. An additional 60
second brushing was done without toothpaste.
Longer brushing times resulted in more plaque removal,
but even at 180 seconds, significant plaque remained along
the gingival margins. Brushing for 180 seconds removed 55
percent more plaque than brushing for 30 seconds. Brushing
for 120 seconds removed 26 percent more plaque than 45
seconds of brushing.
Brushing without toothpaste for 60 seconds removed as
much plaque as brushing with toothpaste for 60 seconds. The
toothpaste provides no added benefit for plaque removal.
Clinical Implications: Toothpaste should not be viewed as
an abrasive for plaque removal, but rather for the ingredients
it might deliver to the oral cavity. Encourage patients
to brush for at least two minutes.
Gallagher, A., Sowinski, J., Bowman, J., Barrett, K., Lowe, S.,
Patel, K., Bosma, M., Creeth, J.: The Effect of Brushing Time
and Dentifrice on Dental Plaque Removal In Vivo. J Dent Hyg
83: 11-116, 2009. |
|
Dry brush inside first
This study was published in JADA in 1998, and adds
to the information presented in the recent toothbrushing
study on this page.
Toothbrushing instructions focus primarily on brush
placement and brushing stroke without focusing on where
to start or what order the teeth should be brushed.
Researchers video taped subjects brushing without
their knowledge and found most followed an erratic pattern,
brushing maxillary facial surfaces first, returning
there several times, and brushing lingual surfaces last, if at
all, and brushing less than one minute.
Twenty-nine private practice RDHs across the United
States tested the “dry brushing inside first’ approach on a
total of 126 recall patients. Baseline data included bleeding
on probing and calculus scores measured on the lingual surfaces
of the mandibular teeth.
Patients were simply instructed to brush the inside of
their bottom teeth first with a dry toothbrush, no water and
no toothpaste. When their mouths felt clean and tasted
clean they rinsed their brushes with water and brushed
again with toothpaste. Bleeding and calculus scores were
recorded again at their next recall visit, an average of six
months later.
Bleeding scores were reduced 55 percent overall.
Calculus scores were reduced 58 percent for all mandibular
lingual surfaces and 63 percent for the anterior section
alone. Notes from the examiners indicated that patients
reported brushing longer than usual as a result of this
approach. Some of the patients were so excited with the
results that they made unscheduled visits to the dental
office to point out their lack of calculus and improved gingival
health.
Clinical Implications: Instructing patients to dry brush
first until the teeth feel clean and taste clean and then
add toothpaste will lead to longer brushing times and
more effective plaque removal.
O’Hehir, T., Suvan, J. Dry Brushing Lingual Surfaces First.
JADA 129: 614, 1998. |
|
|
Virulence of bacteria measured
The number of different bacterial species capable of
colonizing the oral cavity is now over 700. Those found in
subgingival plaque biofilm number just over 400. Oral
bacteria fall into three categories: commensals, opportunistic
pathogens and periodontal pathogens. The commensals
can co-exist in the oral cavity without causing disease.
Opportunistic pathogens are found in health, and can also
cause disease under the right conditions. Periodontal
pathogens are only found in disease and either start or exacerbate
chronic periodontitis.
Epithelial cells release cytokines in response to pathogens,
depending on the virulence of the bacteria. To measure the
reaction of epithelial cells to bacteria, researchers at the
University of Louisville grew epithelial cells in the lab and
then introduced various oral bacteria, and measured the
cytokine release by the tissue cells. The epithelial cells were
grown from tissue removed from three periodontally healthy
patients undergoing crown lengthening procedures.
The four bacteria tested were: P gingivalis, A actinomycetemcomitans,
F nucleatum, and S gordonii. The pro inflammatory
cytokines interleukin 1, (IL-1), IL-6 and IL-8
were measured.
S gordonii is an early commensal colonizer of oral biofilm
and stimulated very little cytokine production by the epithelial
cells.
A actinomycetemcomitans [Aa] and P gingivalis [Pg] are
confirmed periodontal pathogens and they did stimulate
cytokine production. Aa stimulated IL-8 production and Pg stimulated IL-1 production.
F nucleatum is an opportunistic pathogen found in both
health and disease and in this study elicited the highest levels
of all three pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1, IL-6 and IL-8.
Clinical Implications: A variety of bacteria live in oral
biofilm, some harmless and others harmful.
Stathopoulou, P., Benakanakere, M., Galicia, J., Kinane, D.: Epithelial Cell Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Response Differs Across Dental Plaque Bacterial Species. J Clin Perio 37: 24-29, 2010. |
|
Periodontitis linked to pre-eclampsia
Preterm birth is a major cause of infant death worldwide.
Preterm levels are reported at 12 percent in the United States,
five to 10 percent in European countries and six percent in
France, where this study was done. Spontaneous preterm labor
accounts for 65 percent of cases and 35 percent are from identified
factors, primarily pre-eclampsia (pregnancy induced high
blood pressure). Preterm deliveries are identified as either spontaneous
preterm (65 percent) or induced preterm (35 percent),
due to medical conditions and including Caesarean section.
Infection and inflammation also play a role in preterm delivery,
primarily genital and uterine infections.
Researchers in France evaluated women participating in the
large scale study of women giving birth in three French regions
(six hospitals) between 2003 and 2006 (Epipap). Women were
invited to participate in the dental study. Just over 1,000 women
with preterm deliveries and 1,000 women with full-term deliveries
were included in the study. Women who didn’t speak
French or had a variety of medical conditions were excluded
from the study. Periodontal exams were done in the hospital a
few days after giving birth.
Women with preterm deliveries were often of nationalities
other than French, low educational level, lived alone, unemployed,
more missing teeth, heavy calculus, smoked and were
overweight prior to pregnancy. Considering all potential causes
of preterm delivery, periodontitis was significantly associated
with preterm delivery due to pre-eclampsia.
Clinical
Implications: Although not the major cause of
preterm delivery, pregnant patients should be informed of
the risks of periodontal disease and the value of prevention
and treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy.
Nabet, C., Lelong, N., Colombier, M., Sixou, M., Musset, A., Goffinet, F., Kaminski, M: Maternal Periodontitis and the Causes of Preterm Birth: The Case-Control Epipap Study. J Clin Perio 37: 37-45, 2010. |
|
GCF markers for local and systemic inflammation
C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 1 (IL-1) are both
biomarkers of inflammation. CRP is synthesized by the liver
and when elevated in response to inflammation,
it creates what is referred to as an acute phase
reaction. This explains why CRP is
considered an acute phase protein. The purpose
of CRP is to bind to substances on
the surface of dead or dying cells, including
bacteria, in order to activate the compliment
system. This is a biochemical cascade of
events to clear pathogens from the body.
CRP is usually measured in the blood, but
recently it has been measured in gingival
crevicular fluid (GCF).
IL-1 is released locally in periodontal
tissues by epithelial cells, neutrophils,
macrophages, and fibroblasts. IL-1 is
part of the immune system’s defense
against infection.
Researchers at the University of Adelaide
in Australia measured CRP and IL-1 in
GCF samples of nearly 1,000 subjects taking
part in the 2004-2006 Australian
National Survey of Adult Oral Health to
determine the connection to periodontitis.
Just over 400 subjects were diagnosed with
periodontitis and over 500 were healthy
controls. The odds of having periodontitis
were increased by 2.5 when IL-1 was
detected in CGF. Those with CRP detected
in GCF were twice as likely to have periodontitis.
These increased levels of biomarkers
in GCF might be the result of periodontitis
or the consequence of systemic
conditions such as cardiovascular disease,
diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis.
Clinical Implications: Increased levels of biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid indicate periodontal disease and might also indicate inflammatory systemic conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Fitzsimmons, T., Sanders, A., Bartold, P., Slade,
G.: Local and Systemic Biomarkers in Gingival
Crevicular Fluid Increase Odds of Periodontitis. J Clin Perio 37:
30-36, 2010. |
|
Oxidative stress in periodontal pockets
Periodontal disease is triggered
by bacteria, but the
damage to connective tissue
and bone is done by the
body’s own immune system.
White blood cells travel from
blood vessels in healthy connective
tissue to the sulcus to
attack the bacteria. On the
way they release enzymes as
they pass through the tissue
causing destruction of healthy cells along the way and causing release of free
radicals and triggering oxadative stress. This cascade of events is complex,
destructive and leads to the expression of pro-inflammatory genes that continue
the tissue damage.
In defense, healthy cells produce antioxidants, like glutathione, a small
molecule made from three amino acids that can neutralize free radicals.
Higher levels of glutathione are evident in the gingival crevicular fluid of
periodontal pockets, as a measure of defense activity. These levels are higher
than in a healthy sulcus.
Researchers at the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom
compared glutathione levels in gingival crevicular fluid from 20 subjects
with moderate periodontal disease and 20 healthy controls. At baseline, levels
were much lower in healthy controls. Three months following non-surgical
therapy, glutathione levels in those with periodontal disease were
reduced and were closer to those of the healthy controls.
Clinical
Implications: Periodontal tissue destruction results from oxidative stress and the release of free radicals. Future periodontal treatment will likely include the impact of antioxidants in the treatment and control of periodontal disease.
Grant, M., Brock, G., Matthews, J., Chapple, I.: Crevicular Fluid Glutathione
Levels in Periodontitis and the Effect on Non-Surgical Therapy. J Clin Perio 37:
17-23, 2010. |
|