Perio
Reports Vol. 21 No. 4 |
Perio Reports provides easy-to-read research summaries on topics of specific interest to clinicians. Perio Reports research summaries will be included in each issue to keep you on the cutting edge of dental hygiene science.
|
Detecting the CEJ with a probe
It is difficult to accurately detect the cementoenamel
junction (CEJ) when positioned subgingivally. Researchers at
Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam compared
probe readings on extracted permanent and deciduous teeth.
The teeth were cleaned after extraction, dried and root tips
were placed in plaster. Artificial gingiva was created using a
green plastic material and adapted to cover half the clinical
crowns of the teeth.
The examiners were two dentists and two dental hygienists
using three different probes: Hu-Friedy Merrit-B with
Williams marking; Vivacare TPS probe with a pressure detecting
arm; and the Hu-Friedy CPITN probe, also known as the
WHO probe. The TPS and CPITN probes both have ball
tips. Duplicate measurements were done for each site after one
hour. A total of 70 permanent teeth and 30 deciduous teeth
were included in the study.
Lines were drawn on each tooth at the six measurement
points, but did not extend beyond the artificial gingiva.
After all measurements were recorded, the gingiva was
removed and using a microscope, accurate measurements
were made from the end of the black line to the CEJ. These
measurements were compared to the readings recorded by
the clinicians.
Most of the readings were within a millimeter above or
below the actual measurement: 99 percent for the Merritt-B,
93 percent for the TPS and 91 percent for the CPITN probe.
The Meritt-B or standard probe was more accurate in detecting
the CEJ than the other probes.
Clinical Implications: Probing scores can vary two millimeters
between clinicians. Standard probes are more
accurate than ball-tip probes.
Barendregt, D., van der Velden,U., Timmerman, M., Bulthuis,
H., van der Weijden, F.: Detection of the Cemento-Enamel
Junction with Three Different Probes: An “In Vitro” Model. J
Clin Perio 36: 212-218, 2009. |
|
Antibiotic combo reduced need
for more treatment
Researchers at the University of Geneva in Switzerland
compared the effects of full-mouth (both sides within
48 hours) scaling and root planing (SRP) with and without
systemic antibiotics. One clinician performed the
examinations on 47 patients and another provided the
treatment. Oral hygiene was provided at the beginning of
the study, as well as supragingival calculus removal. Only
after patients demonstrated good oral hygiene were they
scheduled for root planing under local anesthesia. Root
planing was done with an EMS power scaler and Gracey
curettes. Following instrumentation, pockets were
irrigated with 0.1 percent chlorhexidine (CHX) and
patients were instructed to rinse twice daily with 1.2 percent
CHX.
At the end of the last treatment visit, subjects were given
packets of either 500mg metronidazole and 375mg amoxicillin
or placebo pills to be taken three times per day for
seven days. They were reevaluated one week later and again
at three and six months.
The test subjects taking the antibiotics healed better
than the control group. At three months, test subjects had
an average of 1.3 probing sites measuring 4mm or more
with bleeding upon probing, compared to 4.4 sites in the
control group. These figures at six months were 0.4 sites in
the test group and 3.0 in the control group. The greatest
healing was seen in pockets 6mm or deeper. Average probing
depths reduced from 7.3 to 3.6 for test subjects and 7.2
to 5.2 for controls at three months. At six months, measurements
were 3.7 for tests and 4.9 for controls.
Clinical Implications: These findings challenge current
thought about the use of antibiotics in combination
with thorough subgingival instrumentation. Significant
healing was evident for those taking the antibiotics.
Cionca, N., Giannopoulou, C., Ugolotti, G., Mombelli, A.:
Amoxicillin and Metronidazole as an Adjunct to Full-Mouth
Scaling and Root Planing of Chronic Periodontitis. J Perio 80:
364-371, 2009. |
|
|
Chairside diagnostics are being developed
Current periodontal diagnostics lack the ability to determine
disease onset or predict further disease. Radiographs and
probing scores provide a history of the disease, but do not
show current disease activity. Current
diagnostics must detect significant tissue
destruction to show changes in disease
and are therefore poor predictors.
Diagnostics for other diseases use bodily
fluids tested at the time of care or as the
new terminology states: “point of care diagnostics”
or “lab on a chip technologies.”
Salivary tests are easy to carry out and offer
significant potential for periodontal diagnosis.
Researchers at Forsyth Institute in Boston
analyzed biomarkers from saliva and subgingival
plaque biofilm to determine disease status.
Ninety-nine subjects were categorized as healthy
(no bone loss, no probing depths over 4mm, and
less than 20 bleeding points (BOP)), gingivitis (no bone loss
and more than 20 BOP), mild periodontitis (less than 30 percent
of sites with attachment loss (AL) of 3mm or more) or
moderate to severe periodontitis (more than 30 percent of
sites with 3mm or more AL). The number of smokers in each
group increased from zero percent in the healthy group to 81
percent in the moderate to severe group.
Biomarkers associated with three distinct phases of disease
were measured and found to be higher with
advancing disease. Cytokines associated with
inflammation, connective tissue destruction
and changes in bone were measured and
correlated with clinical signs of disease.
Bacteria identified in the biofilm changed
with advancing disease to include more of
the “red complex” or periodontal disease
specific bugs, P gingivalis, T denticola and
T forsythia.
Clinical Implications: We will soon see
chairside diagnostics to distinguish
between health, gingivitis and advancing
periodontitis.
Ramseier, C., Kinney, J., Herr, A., Braun, T., Sugai, J.,
Shelburne, C., Rayburn, L., Tran, H., Singh, A., Giannobile, W.:
Identification of Pathogen and Host-Response Markers Correlated
with Periodontal Disease. J Perio 80: 436-446, 2009. |
|
Ultrasonic coolant supply
Heat is produced when ultrasonic scalers convert electrical
energy to mechanical vibrations. The temperature inside the
tooth should not exceed an 8° temperature change, so water or
fluid is used for cooling. Laboratory studies show a 35°C
increase in dentin temperature when used without water.
Adequate water for cooling should be 20-30 ml/minute.
It is important that the coolant reach the end of the tip when
it is placed in a deep pocket. When used on high power settings,
the water is often thrown off the instrument before reaching the
very tip.
Researchers at the Academic Centre for Dentistry in
Amsterdam, The Netherlands compared coolant water flow
between five, stand alone, ultrasonic scalers. The study included
three units of each brand: EMS PM-400, EMS-PM600, Satelec
P-max, Dürr Vector and Dentsply Cavitron. A variety of tips
were tested for each unit running them for one minute,
unloaded at full and medium water flow settings. Testing was
repeated five times for each tip.
Adjusting from high power to medium power corresponded
to a 50 percent reduction in fluid for the EMS units,
40 percent for the Cavitron and 25 percent for the Vector. At
full water flow rates, the EMS units and the Cavitron provided
more than the recommended 20-30 ml/minute.
Indicators on the units did not accurately reflect the amount
of coolant flowing. Perio tips for the EMS units and the
Cavitron allowed less coolant water flow than standard tips.
Variation in the amount of fluid was evident when comparing
different tips of the same design.
Clinical Implications: When changing ultrasonic inserts,
water flow should be checked due to variations between tips.
Koster, T., Timmerman, M., Feilzer, A., Van der Velden, U., Van
der Weijden, F.: Water Coolant Supply in Relation to Different
Ultrasonic Scaler Systems, Tips, and Coolant Settings. J Clin Perio
36: 127-131, 2009. |
|
Obesity is systemic inflammation
Obesity is considered to be low-grade, systemic inflammation.
Adipose tissue cells secrete cytokines similar to those associated
with periodontitis. Cytokines play an essential part in the
regulation of inflammation, both in causing tissue damage and
activating defense mechanisms. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Tumor
Necrosis Factor-∂ (TNF-∂) are two of more than 50 other bioactive
substances known as adipokines.
Researchers at the University of Oulu in Finland investigated
the role of IL-6 and TNF-∂ in periodontal
disease in overweight subjects.
Between 2000 and 2001, the National
Public Health Institute of Finland gathered
data on a group of more than 8,000 subjects.
A subset of 425 subjects from 45 to
74 years, free of diabetes, arthritis and nonsmokers
underwent testing for blood serum
levels of IL-6 and TNF-∂. Clinical indices
were also recorded for probing depths and
plaque levels. Body Mass Index (BMI) is
a calculation of body weight related to
height. A score of 25 or higher is considered
overweight, and 30 and higher is considered
obese.
An association was found between
serum IL-6 levels, deepened periodontal
pockets, and elevated BMI scores. No association
was found between TNF-∂ levels,
probing depths and BMI scores.
It may be that the IL-6 produced by the
adipose tissue exerts some biological mechanism
making the overweight person more
susceptible to periodontal disease. From
these findings we see a link, but no cause
and effect. Further study is needed.
Clinical Implications: With more
research we will better understand the
inflammatory processes involved with
both obesity and periodontal disease.
Saxlin, T., Suominen-Taipale, L., Leiviskä, J.,
Jula, A., Knuuttila, M., Ylöstalo, P.: Role of
Serum Cytokines Tumour Necrosis Factor-∂
and Interleukin-6 in the Association Between
Body Weight and Periodontal Infection. J Clin
Perio 36-100-105, 2009. |
|
Obesity linked to risk of periodontitis
Obesity is on the rise and becoming a significant worldwide health problem.
According to the CDC, 34 percent of U.S. adults older than the age of
20 were obese in 2006. Obesity is associated with serious life-threatening
diseases including cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes. Several recent
publications show that obesity is also linked to an increased risk for periodontal
disease.
Researchers at the Forsyth Institute in Boston evaluate 745 subjects
enrolled in 15 different studies within the Department of Periodontology at
the Forsyth Institute. They wanted to determine whether being overweight or
obese was associated with a greater risk for periodontal disease. They also
compared the bacterial makeup of subgingival biofilm between obese and
healthy weight subjects.
Two-thirds of those categorized as healthy/gingivitis subjects had a normal
BMI. In contrast, only one-third of subjects with periodontitis had a normal
BMI. Subjects considered overweight or obese were three to five times
more likely to have periodontal disease. More periodontal disease was
observed in obese subjects under 45 years of age compared to non-obese subjects.
Overweight and obese subjects, younger than 47 years, were nearly four
times more likely to have periodontal disease than those with a normal BMI.
Tannerella forsythia is a bacteria usually associated with deep pockets.
Among subjects in the healthy/gingivitis group, T forsythia was found in
higher levels in the obese subjects compared to the normal weight subjects.
Clinical Implications: As more research findings are published linking
obesity in patients under 47 years of age to a greater risk for periodontitis,
more aggressive preventive therapy may be recommended
for these patients.
Haffajee, A., Socransky, S.: Relation of Body Mass Index, Periodontitis and
Tannerella Forsythia. J Clin Perio 36: 89-99, 2009. |
|