As the Baby Boomer population ages, the numbers of edentulous
and partially edentulous patients are increasing, since tooth
loss and age are related. Whether it is due to neglect, caries, medications
or other systemic reasons, patients are presenting to practices
all over the country needing extractions that can eventually
lead to full dentures. Once converted to dentures, these patients
have concerns of ill-fitting or loose dentures and the inability to
eat or function as they once did with teeth. Because of these concerns,
it is important to incorporate some type of implants into
the plan. Implants, whether small or traditional width, allow
patients with dentures to eat and function much more naturally.
Case Study
A patient of record in his early 60s presented to our office
wanting implants placed in his upper arch for denture stabilization.
A few years prior, I had placed implant-supported fixed
bridges on the lower arch from #18-#30 since he was dissatisfied
with his previous lower complete denture. Recently, it became
financially possible for him to have an implant-supported maxillary
overdenture.
Palpation and radiographic examination revealed a moderately
sized maxillary ridge in the anterior portion (Fig. 1) that
would provide sufficient height and width for implants. However,
in the posterior sections there was insufficient bone due to the
pneumatization of the sinus cavities (Fig. 2).
All risks, benefits and alternatives regarding various treatments
were discussed with the patient. After a thorough discussion of treatment
options, the patient decided he would like to have four
implants placed in his pre-maxilla region with Locator (Zest) attachments
retaining a metal-reinforced palate-free maxillary denture.
A CBCT scan was taken to accurately treatment plan this case
to make certain that no complications would arise from the conservative
non-flap approach of placing the dental implants. Blue
Sky Plan software (Blue Sky Bio) was used through Glidewell virtual
assistance (Dr. Brad Bockhurst) to precisely plan the placement
of four 3.25mm x 12mm TSI (OCO Biomedical) dental
implants in the anterior portion of the pre-maxilla area. Once the
surgical guide and new denture (Glidewell Dental Lab) was
received in our office and tried in for verification of proper fit, the
area was anesthetized using 1.8ml 4% Septocaine (Septodent) with
1:100,000 epinephrine. Using the surgical guide provided by
Glidewell Dental Lab (Fig. 3), the site for the implant was begun
with a 2mm pilot drill utilizing the Mont Blanc surgical handpiece
and Aseptico surgical motor at a speed of 1200rpm with copious
amounts of (90%) sterile saline irrigation.
The pilot drill was advanced to a depth of
15mm measuring from the tissue surface. This
additional 3mm was the same depth of the tissue
height to bone. Paralleling pins were then
placed in the site of the osteotomies to confirm
the accuracy of the surgical guide and a
panoramic X-ray was taken to check the angulations
of the pins within the maxilla. Using a
rotary tissue punch, an outline was created
over the initial osteotomy and the tissue plug
removed with a serrated curette (Zoll-Dental).
A final osteotomy former, included in the
(OCO Biomedical) implant kit (Fig. 4) was
used to shape the osteotomy sites for the
implants. Once the osteotomy sites were completed,
an implant finger driver was used to place the dental
implants until increased torque was necessary. The ratchet wrench
was then connected to the adapter and the implants torqued to
final depths reaching a torque level of about 50-60Ncm.
Having the ability to immediately "osseofixate" due to their
proprietary design, I prefer OCO Biomedical's TSI dental
implants when considering progressive or immediate loading with
the Locator (Zest) overdenture attachment system (Fig. 5). Some
of the advantages of the Locator (Zest) attachment system include
a self-aligning feature, dual-retention and one of the lowest
implant attachment profiles available. In other words, the selfaligning
ability of the Locator (Zest) attachment aids patients in
positioning their prosthesis so that it can be properly seated without
damage to the attachment components.
Free-standing attachments like the Locator (Zest) used to
retain overdentures provide numerous advantages, including
enhanced aesthetics, phonetics, ease of maintenance and simplified
hygiene. This type of prosthesis is primarily tissue-borne
with the implants providing retention and stability.
Utilizing a marking stick (Dr. Thompson's Marking Sticks),
we identified the areas in the denture that would require removal
for the overdenture housings (Fig. 6). Once relieved, Quick Up
Test C&B silicone (VOCO America) was injected into the overdenture
recesses. The overdenture was seated over the attachment
caps and the Quick Up Test C&B (VOCO America) was allowed
to set before the overdenture was removed. Any interference that
was detected between the denture base and attachments was
checked and eliminated.
Quick Up Adhesive (VOCO America) was painted into the
overdenture recesses to enhance retention between the denture
base and the material. Petroleum jelly was applied to the surrounding
surfaces of the denture to prevent unwanted adherence
of excess resin. Quick Up luting resin (VOCO America) was then
injected about two thirds of the height of each recess (Fig. 7) and
the overdenture was seated. The prosthesis was gently held in
place by hand and after a total of three minutes, the overdenture
with the incorporated caps was removed. Slight voids around the
caps or in the access openings were filled with QuickUp LC
(VOCO America), a matching light-cured flowable composite
resin (Fig. 8). At the completion of the prosthetic phase, the
patient stated how pleased he was to be able to smile again without
the prosthesis falling out (Fig. 9). The post-operative panorex
view (Fig. 10) depicts the accuracy of using a CT-based surgical
guide when placing multiple implants.
More and more patients are presenting to dental practices
requiring this type of reconstruction. By providing multiple services
in a shorter number of visits under one roof, the dental
provider will find more patients who will accept treatment. In
doing so, dental providers will be helping their patients get to
proper form, function and health.
|