My primary role as a clinical professor at the University
of California, San Francisco School of Dentistry has been to
supervise the patient care of the senior dental students,
preparing them for their Western Regional Board exams as
well as giving them confidence to begin their practices. We
all know that the “real” education usually begins after the
diploma and license are secured, and there are numerous
regulations worldwide that govern our continuing education.
In addition, newer dental technology and procedures,
ranging from computer-aided restoration design to laser
use to implantology are only beginning to be integrated
into the pre-doctoral dental school curriculum. Thus, the
clinician who wishes to utilize these modalities must search
out learning opportunities, which might not be very available
or convenient.
The primary tenet of ethical dental practice is to perform
procedures that are within your training, experience
and scope of practice. Hopefully your laser purchase
included proper instruction, although I have seen a wide
variety of such courses. Clearly, the novice laser user has
much experience to gain, and should be well aware of the
standard of care of any procedure. Having said that, the use
of dental lasers by practitioners in the United States has
some governance, and you might be surprised at some of the
language in your own Dental Practice Act.
In Arizona, there are specific regulations for both dental
hygienists and dentists regarding “emerging scientific technology.”
The text from Arizona’s Dental Practice Act says,
“Use emerging scientific technology and prescribe the necessary
training, experience and supervision to operate newly
developed scientific technology. A dentist who supervises a
dental hygienist whose duties include the use of emerging
scientific technology must have training on the use of the
emerging technology that is equal to or greater than the
training the dental hygienist is required to obtain” (§ 32-
1281, D. 2.). Furthermore, that training must:
- “… be offered by a recognized dental school as
defined in A.R.S. § 32-1201(17), a recognized
dental hygiene school as defined in A.R.S. § 32-
1201(16) or sponsored by a national or state dental
or dental hygiene association or government agency;
- Include didactic instruction with a written examination;
- Include hands-on clinical instruction; and
- Be technology that is scientifically based and supported
by studies published in peer reviewed dental journals”
(R4-11-601).
California has some brief language about a dental auxiliary’s
laser use and generalizes the concept by saying, “No
auxiliary may provide any service, including the use of a
laser, if doing so would be beyond the scope of their education,
experience and training;” and, “A registered dental
hygienist may use any material or device approved for use
in the performance of a service or procedure within his or
her scope of practice under the appropriate level of supervision,
if he or she has the appropriate education and
training required to use the material or device” (B&P §
1684, 1914).
In Louisiana, a dental hygienist may not use a laser,
but for the dentist has a mandate: “Prior to commencing
use of the laser for dental purposes, a dentist must obtain
appropriate training for the laser being utilized” (§1303).
Nevada has a requirement for re-licensure for any practitioner
(NAC 631.033, NRS 631.190, 631.330). Each
licensee who uses or wishes to use a laser in his practice of
dentistry or dental hygiene must include with his application
for renewal of his license:
- A statement certifying that each laser used by the
licensee in his practice of dentistry or dental
hygiene has been cleared by the Food and Drug
Administration for use in dentistry; and
- Proof that the doctor has successfully completed a
course in laser proficiency that:
(a) Is at least six hours in length; and
(b) Is based on the Curriculum Guidelines and
Standards for Dental Laser Education, adopted by
reference pursuant to NAC 631.035.
Other states have very general language that prohibits
laser use by any auxiliary or has no specific prohibition.
The Curriculum Guidelines and Standards for Dental
Laser Education is a published manuscript that defines several
course levels, and the first two lines of its Statement of Purpose say, “This document provides guidelines to assure
safe and efficacious use of lasers for the health and welfare
of the patient. It establishes the standards of education in
the use of lasers in dentistry and defines standards for the
demonstration of competency.”
In my opinion, a laser practitioner should consider
courses that use the Guidelines as topics for instruction, and
laser manufacturers should either include such courses in
the sales price of the instrument or direct the purchaser to
those instructional offerings with both device-specific
training as well as broad background knowledge. The first
level of courses would be introductory and would encompass
some brief fundamentals and demonstrations of how a
laser could become part of a treatment protocol. These
courses would necessarily be short in length (approximately
three hours) and could be either general in scope or a company
infomercial. The second level competency course
should follow the Standard Certification curriculum in
those Guidelines, with topics that include laser fundamentals,
an overview of all laser types and safety and practice
management. Those generalities would form the foundation
for detailed study of clinical applications of the practitioner’s
own instrument(s), simulation exercises and a
written examination. This would be a minimum two-day
course, and could have additional days added, perhaps several
months later, to both check and refine the clinician’s
knowledge. The first two days would be held at a university,
or at a state or national association’s dental conference.
The additional days could be at those venues as well or
conducted under the auspices of the manufacturer.
So what do we do? Allow me to propose some points
for your consideration:
- During your laser purchase, ask detailed questions
about training. I’ve seen many online resources and
DVD collections. Some manufacturers offer multiday
courses similar to the competency course discussed
above. Some of these might be included in
the purchase price. Along with the didactic knowledge
gained at your computer monitor, I strongly
recommend that you receive live hands-on instruction
so that you can practice using your laser. You
might have to be diligent about finding the right
educational opportunities.
- Dentists fundamentally believe that we owe our
patients the best options for treatment using evidence-
based procedures and materials, and that
requires our effort to seek out the knowledge and
understanding of what we offer.
- Ultimately, a safe and effective practitioner would
obtain university-based competency (or certification),
which would far surpass current regulatory
language. Practicing laser dentistry with that kind of
credential would indeed be a great standard of care.
- We could proactively engage with our state boards
(or other international regulatory bodies). This dialogue
could include frank conversations about any
sections of the Dental Practice Act affecting lasers,
as well as producing our certificates of competency
to show that we are serious about our safe and effective
use of those instruments. Imagine this precedent
– a self-regulating group of well-trained and
educated practitioners!
The point of this discussion is your laser use might
have some implications for your dental licensure. The
aforementioned states all use the word “must” when referring
to dental laser training. This mandate puts the burden
and ethical obligation of obtaining education directly on
us. Arizona and Nevada have specific requirements for that
training and the latter requires documentation of that
course when applying for re-licensure. I have had brief conversations
with a few members of other state boards,
who’ve asked my opinion of what sort of regulation might
be drafted regarding lasers. Nevertheless, I’m advocating
that we procure competency on our own – seek out and
demand course offerings that produce measureable competency.
That’s true professionalism.
|