When I graduated in 1990, a large proportion of my UK
diploma in dental hygiene was related to aspects of dental caries,
fluoride, fissure sealants, dietary advice and analysis and oral
hygiene instruction. For the next 18 years, it was an exponential
year-on-year decline in the amount of time I dedicated to the
prevention of tooth-related problems and in 2008, almost all of
my working day related to periodontal disease.
Why was this? My treatment of periodontal disease was continually
being updated. My skills with various instruments were
constantly being fine-tuned. I had a genuine interest in perio
and it was an easy path to follow. My treatment and prevention
of caries had not changed in 18 years. In 2008 I was giving,
more or less, the same advice that I was giving in 1990. I’m not
blaming anyone but myself for this approach, but in my defense,
I had regularly attended clinical update meetings and scientific
courses, but I do not recall reading many scientific articles or
attending many lectures on the subject. Was it available then or
was I not looking hard enough? I allowed myself to be steered
down a path where I was in my comfort zone and the dentists and periodontists who were referring patients to me were obviously
happy for me to continue along this path. Did dentists,
the government, professional or governing bodies, or even the
general public realize that hygienists have an important role to
play in caries management? Why and how did I change?
My colleague, Mark, and I, were discussing caries management
by risk assessment (CAMBRA) upon his return from
practicing in New Zealand, where far from being a “backwater,”
they appeared to be years ahead of the U.K. in caries management.
I have the greatest respect for Mark, but I was
skeptical about this new approach to caries. Mark confided that
he too was skeptical at first, but one event changed his mind.
While in New Zealand, he was invited to a dental peer group
meeting where the Regional Dental Officer gathered the community
dental therapists together to calibrate their reading of
dental radiographs in children. They were all asked to bring
examples to compare and discuss. Mark was shocked at the absence of any preventive approach to caries risk management.
His fellow dental therapists perceived their responsibility to be
addressing the vast flood of caries restoratively, especially in the
indigenous Maori population and outer lying settlements of
Northland. It appeared that to them, their only option was
restorative dentistry! Mark realized how fortunate he was to be
working in a clinic following the CAMBRA model and working
to prevent caries, not just repair the damage. He was in a
completely different environment than those hard-pressed therapists
who focused only on restorative care.
After a year of listening to Mark I still wasn’t changing my
approach. It was then he persuaded me to go to the Greater
New York Dental Meeting to listen to an eminent speaker on
the subject of CAMBRA. The room was crammed with
hygienists, people were sitting on the floor and some stood up
at the back. During this lecture, I had my “Eureka!” moment.
With all the science laid out before me, CAMBRA did make
sense and was something I felt obligated to offer my patients.
My enthusiasm to completely change the practice overnight
had to be tempered by reality. CAMBRA requires a significant
change in mindset and CAMBRA conversion affects all systems
within the practice, from scheduling and fees to diagnostics,
treatment and patient education. Rome wasn’t built in a day.
I’m happy that my working life is moving in the right direction.
Dental Caries
The prevalence of dental caries in the U.S. is described as a
“silent epidemic” affecting “the most vulnerable citizens: poor
children, the elderly and many members of racial and ethnic
minority groups.” Statistics vary from 50 percent of children
experiencing caries in deciduous teeth to 25 percent of adolescents
experiencing caries in 80 percent of permanent teeth. In
the U.K., statistics aren’t much different. Caries is a transmissible
disease that requires primary prevention, strategies and
agents to forestall the onset of disease and reverse or arrest the
process of disease before secondary reparative treatment becomes
necessary. Despite evidence that caries can be prevented, caries
rates seem to be ever increasing.
The concept that dental caries is a process rather than a
categorical disease with cavitated and non-cavitated states was
reported more than 100 years ago, in 1886. Dr. Magitot
divided the disease into three stages: caries of enamel, caries of
dentine and deep caries. Two years later, Dr. Morsman stressed
the importance of diagnosis as the first step in the management
of dental caries. Dental caries is now defined as a transmissible
bacterial infection that should be curable and preventable and
whose etiological agents are specific bacteria that generate acids
from fermentable carbohydrates.
New paradigms are being sought to address deep concerns
among health-care professionals to meet these challenges. CAMBRA was developed in the United States and is presently
being embraced throughout the world. CAMBRA is an evidence-
based caries management system that is founded on a
team approach and an understanding of the nature, prevention
and treatment of dental caries. It incorporates the ethos that risk
assessment and interventions are based on the concept of altering
the caries balance in favor of health by identifying and treating
pathological (risk) factors such as pathogenic bacteria,
unhealthy saliva and poor dietary habits (i.e. frequent ingestion
of fermentable carbohydrates) and promoting protective factors
including saliva, sealants, antimicrobials, fluoride, oral probiotics
and a healthy diet.
It is also clear that the current concept of caries
is constantly being redefined as new evidence and
information is presented. It should now be looked
upon as an infectious transmissible disease process
where a cariogenic biofilm, in the presence of an oral
status that is more pathological than protective leads
to the demineralization of the dental hard tissues.
Caries Risk Assessment
Caries risk assessment (CRA) is defined as the
procedure to predict future caries development before the
clinical onset of the disease. The CRA can be carried out as part
of the dentist’s clinical examination in conjunction with the
medical history or by the hygienist/therapist when referred by
a dentist. CRA forms consist of a questionnaire that collects
information on the existing pathogenic and protective factors
present. These factors would include various stages of carious
lesions, diet, fluoride, health, medication, socio-economic, age,
oral hygiene, saliva, plaque and bacterial balance. Gathering as
much information as accurately as possible is essential for the
success of the treatment, engagement and education of the
patient. After completing these forms, the clinician can determine
the level of risk that these factors indicate to the individual.
Forms can be completed for child and adult groups.
The Californian Dental Association (CDA) suggests placing
patients in either a high-, medium- or low-risk category.
Determining the risk is not an exact science but a clinical determination
based upon visible (intra-oral and
screening) and radiographic evidence, the individuals
health and dental histories and lifestyle
factors. The imperative is to understand the individual’s
balance of risk against the protective factors
and identify his or her status accordingly.
Then a process of management can begin to alter
or modify risk and protective factors accordingly.
These are managed by the clinician and patient
and reviewed at appropriate intervals depending
upon risk.
The completed assessment will help structure the data collected
and shed light upon the management of the individual
where treatment options are challenging. For example, think
about two caries-free children with different mutans Streptococci
levels in their saliva. Assuming each has the same diet, it is very
likely that the child with higher counts will develop more caries
than the other with low levels. However, if the child with low levels
eats sugary foods frequently and the higher one doesn’t, who
has the greatest chance of developing caries? Imagine that the low
bacterial count child supplements sugary foods with fluoride and
the other does not, again, who will develop more caries, and so
forth? In this way, by adding several aggravating and
counteracting risk factors the permutations are
potentially vast. The risk assessments intention is to
help unlock this puzzle.
The development of CRA and caries risk management
(CRM) have proved to be a continually
evolving experience. Surprisingly the challenge was
not that of critically appraising research and creating
a strategy but of discovering the agents and materials
to complement and implement the assessment and
guidelines scattered amongst the dental profession
and dental suppliers and not unified under one umbrella. If such
a strategy is to evolve, then not only should the profession
embrace developing acceptable guidelines but also the corporate
industry coming together unified as part of this collaboration.
Professionally, I feel like I’ve been given a new lease of life.
I’m now looking at all of my patients through different eyes. I
have a much greater understanding of the importance of balancing
oral health, looking at each individual patient holistically
and I spend as much time listening and gathering information
now as I do talking.
My appointment book looks much more interesting and the
whole team is really enjoying getting involved in something new.
My own resistance to change makes me realize that making
changes in the practice and with patients is going to be a rocky,
yet exciting and rewarding road ahead.
Next Month: Part 2 – Technologies Used in Caries Risk Assessment and Prevention
|