I have recently returned from the IDS meeting
in Cologne, Germany. It is the largest dental meeting
on the planet and it happens once every two
years. The numbers are staggering - 2,058
exhibitors and more than 125,000 attendees from
149 countries. To put things in perspective, the
2013 Chicago Midwinter Meeting had 600
exhibitors and 29,000 attendees. The large scale of
this meeting is not only impressive but it is the best
perspective on the current state of our profession
that you can get at a live event. In fact, as a dentist
from the U.S., it is a glimpse into the future
because many new technologies arrive in the U.S.
last due in part to FDA regulatory hurdles.
I came away from the meeting with a few
observations about the state of our industry. One
of the most profound shifts is the explosion of
CAD/CAM in dental offices and labs. There were
two big players in the industry that had in-office
systems on display: Planmeca and Carestream (for
a sneak peek at these systems see sidebar). Specific
launch dates for the U.S. market were not available
prior to publication of this article. There are
also many credible players already in the digital
impression category - 3M True Definition
Scanner, Cadent iTero and 3Shape TRIOS (now
available in color). Conservative estimates indicate
that we will have 12+ systems within the next
12 months.
Choices are great for competition
and innovation, but this can often create
paralysis by analysis as dentists are now
trying to sort out which solution is the
best fit for their particular situation. I
think the first question to answer is: Are
you willing to do some lab work on your
end to provide same-day final restorations?
I can say from personal experience
this is both extremely rewarding as well as a
tedious part of the in-office CAD/CAM
experience. If you are not sure of
the answer to that question,
get a system that
can be adapted to inoffice
milling in the future. Most systems have this
option even when their primary marketing is for
digital impressions. The final bit of advice I would
offer is to insist that you have a live-patient
demonstration. I watched a gentleman from
3Shape at the Chicago Midwinter Meeting scan
his own mouth and it was impressive that a scan
could be that fast and accurate when he was unable
to see what he was doing! Models are fine to get a
general sense but I would not buy any device without
a live-patient demonstration.
I think that many make the mistake of looking
at this technology as a "lab killer." While some dentists
have moved a significant portion of their labfabricated
restorations in house, there is still a need
for the dental lab. In fact, some of the smart labs are
working deals to subsidize some of the cost of a digital
impression system in exchange for your loyalty.
Even without these incentive programs, labs will
move quickly to capture dentists using CAD/CAM
as clients because they know the technology yields
better results and fewer remakes. The lab can save
on labor and increase output using technology,
while the dentist might enjoy more competitive lab
fees and faster case turnaround.
Without a doubt, this conversation will continue
the debate of closed versus open systems.
While I stand firmly in the open camp, there are
some companies that will be reluctant to change.
For more detail on my position, read my January
2013 column on this topic. Please be sure to share
your feedback and comments on this article
online at Dentaltown.com. The digital editions of
our magazine provide the ability to comment on
every article.
|