Second opinions are common in health care, whether a doctor is sorting out a difficult case or a patient is not sure what to do next.
In the context of our magazine, the first opinion will always belong to the reader. This feature will allow fellow dental professionals
to share their opinions on various topics, providing you with a "second opinion." Perhaps some of these observations will change
your mind, while others will solidify your position. In the end, our goal is to create discussion and debate to enrich our profession.
- Thomas Giacobbi, DDS, FAGD, Editorial Director, Dentaltown Magazine
In recent years, the question "Should endodontists
place implants?" has crossed the minds of virtually every
endodontist in the U.S., if not the world. Opinions range
from yes to maybe someday to never. The objective of this
article is to explain to general dentists the advantages of
their local endodontists placing implants when a tooth with
failing RCT is unfit to be saved, but also to answer the concerns
of endodontists who answered "maybe someday." The
endodontists who said never... well, I can't help them.
For general dentists, having an endodontist place
implants is a positive. If your local endodontist does
implant surgery and that is not who you want to place
implants in your patients, just say "no" when he or she asks.
You'll never get an argument, and if you say "no" a couple
more times, your local endodontist who does implant surgery
won't even ask, he will simply refer your patients with
unsalvageable teeth to another surgeon of your choice. Even
when referring dentists prefer another implant surgeon,
endodontists who have trained up to place implants are
more likely to be on the same page as the GP when it comes
to treatment planning for a sketchy tooth. Endodontists
who place implants are the least biased of
all specialists who place implants, simply
because they are the only implant surgeons
who can do either procedure.
Implants qualify as one of the
greatest advancements in the history
of dentistry. Implants have
changed every specialty (except
maybe pedodontics) and the whole of
general practice forever, but I've seen it
up close in the specialty of endodontics.
Implant placement has radically morphed
periodontal practice from
a dreary specialty to a really
cool, effective and profitable
field. The aesthetic
advancements that periodontists
have brought
to the implant party are truly remarkable. The specialty
of prosthodontics has changed nearly as much. Prosthodontists
used to deal with slowly deconstructing full-mouth
cases with few options besides removable prostheses after a
certain point. Now, with the right implant placement,
prosthodontists have become like Superman - they can put
anything back together.
Just as the periodontists did 20 years ago, many
endodontists have now trained up and implant surgery is a
significant part of their practice. However they (we) are still
a small minority of the specialty, so the majority of the
changes to endo from implants have been less direct, but in
significant ways that have irrevocably improved our treatment
planning, and thus our success rates.
The best of those changes has been the fact that we are
no longer asked to do heroic endo to save precarious teeth
because they are the last distal abutment in an arch. Most of
the teeth that were hemisected and root amped by periodontists
back in the day were successfully treated by
endodontists only to fail structurally when the same occluding
forces were borne by fewer roots. Endo heroics aside, the
greatest positive change the implant era has delivered to our
specialty has been endodontists placing implants. When my
colleagues ask how an endodontist, not trained in implant
placement in grad school, can rationalize including implant
surgery in their practice, I answer:
- Everybody places implants, even orthodontists. The
only dentists who think endos shouldn't place
implants are insecure implant surgeons and endodontists
who don't really feel comfortable doing
endo surgery.
- The majority of periodontists weren't trained to place
implants in their graduate programs either, yet they
have done magnificent work. Weren't periodontists
rather uncomfortable when they began to cut bone
near maxillary sinuses and mandibular alveolar nerve
canals? Endodontists who do apical surgery on premolars
and molars have been there their whole careers
and are usually unconcerned by those situations.
- No patient wants to meet another specialist after
the endodontist determines the prognosis is
upside down.
- Endodontists who can place implants offer the
least biased specialty opinion about salvageability of
teeth with failing RCT; whether to re-treat them or
replace them with Ti. Including implant placement
in my practice has been popular with my referring
dentists from the start. New generations of
endodontists will be trained to place implants in
post-doctoral implant fellowships.
As an aside, endodontists, please stop badmouthing
GPs' endodontic failures, it only teaches them to refer their
next failing cases to a periodontist or oral surgeon who will
"tisk tisk" that root canal treatment doesn't work very well,
conversely absolving the GP of responsibility while simultaneously
building his implant practice. Also, please stop
retreating loser teeth, it makes endo look like a space maintainer
for an implant.
To the periodontists and oral surgeons, root canal
therapy, when done correctly, works as often as implants
do. The majority of RCT is done by GPs with a wide
range of talent, and that's not to mention variance in the
specialty pool. Implant surgeons who badmouth root
canal therapy as a procedure sound just as dumb as
endodontists who talk down implants. Please remember
that dentists only refer failing RCT to you. Not one of
them has ever sent a successful RCT to a periodontist or
an oral surgeon and said, "Hey guys! Check it out! Nice
endo outcome, huh?" Dentists only refer RCT failures to
their favorite implant surgeon.
The best service for patients with failing RCT is always
referral to an endodontic specialist with big talent, exceptional
judgment and access to a cone beam CT machine.
Ideally, when the prognosis may be upside-down, refer your
patient to an endodontic specialist with talent, judgment,
3D imaging and an equal love of implant surgery.
Root canal therapy can be done through remarkably
conservative access cavity preparations and it has never been
easier to treat root canal systems to their full apical and lateral
extents (Fig. 1). An experienced endodontist can,
through conventional and surgical means, definitively
resolve disease states inside teeth without destroying the
structural integrity of the abutment (Figs. 2a-b).
Conclusion
The time has come for endodontists to think of
themselves as understructure specialists, rather than dentists
with a specialty certificate who only do non-surgical
re-treatment procedure that many GPs assume they can
do themselves. If you want to be a specialist, be special
(Figs. 3a-b).
|