Second opinions are common in health care, whether a doctor is sorting out a difficult case or a patient is not sure what to do next.
            In the context of our magazine, the first opinion will always belong to the reader. This feature will allow fellow dental professionals
            to share their opinions on various topics, providing you with a "second opinion." Perhaps some of these observations will change
            your mind, while others will solidify your position. In the end, our goal is to create discussion and debate to enrich our profession.
             
            - Thomas Giacobbi, DDS, FAGD, Editorial Director, Dentaltown Magazine
             
             
            In recent years, the question "Should endodontists
            place implants?" has crossed the minds of virtually every
            endodontist in the U.S., if not the world. Opinions range
            from yes to maybe someday to never. The objective of this
            article is to explain to general dentists the advantages of
            their local endodontists placing implants when a tooth with
            failing RCT is unfit to be saved, but also to answer the concerns
            of endodontists who answered "maybe someday." The
            endodontists who said never... well, I can't help them.
             
             
            For general dentists, having an endodontist place
            implants is a positive. If your local endodontist does
            implant surgery and that is not who you want to place
            implants in your patients, just say "no" when he or she asks.
            You'll never get an argument, and if you say "no" a couple
            more times, your local endodontist who does implant surgery
            won't even ask, he will simply refer your patients with
            unsalvageable teeth to another surgeon of your choice. Even
            when referring dentists prefer another implant surgeon,
            endodontists who have trained up to place implants are
            more likely to be on the same page as the GP when it comes
            to treatment planning for a sketchy tooth. Endodontists
            who place implants are the least biased of
            all specialists who place implants, simply
            because they are the only implant surgeons
            who can do either procedure.
             
             
            Implants qualify as one of the
            greatest advancements in the history
            of dentistry. Implants have
            changed every specialty (except
            maybe pedodontics) and the whole of
            general practice forever, but I've seen it
            up close in the specialty of endodontics.
            Implant placement has radically morphed
            periodontal practice from
            a dreary specialty to a really
            cool, effective and profitable
            field. The aesthetic
            advancements that periodontists
            have brought
            to the implant party are truly remarkable. The specialty
            of prosthodontics has changed nearly as much. Prosthodontists
            used to deal with slowly deconstructing full-mouth
            cases with few options besides removable prostheses after a
            certain point. Now, with the right implant placement,
            prosthodontists have become like Superman - they can put
            anything back together.
             
             
            Just as the periodontists did 20 years ago, many
            endodontists have now trained up and implant surgery is a
            significant part of their practice. However they (we) are still
            a small minority of the specialty, so the majority of the
            changes to endo from implants have been less direct, but in
            significant ways that have irrevocably improved our treatment
            planning, and thus our success rates.
             
             
            The best of those changes has been the fact that we are
            no longer asked to do heroic endo to save precarious teeth
            because they are the last distal abutment in an arch. Most of
            the teeth that were hemisected and root amped by periodontists
            back in the day were successfully treated by
            endodontists only to fail structurally when the same occluding
            forces were borne by fewer roots. Endo heroics aside, the
            greatest positive change the implant era has delivered to our
            specialty has been endodontists placing implants. When my
            colleagues ask how an endodontist, not trained in implant
            placement in grad school, can rationalize including implant
            surgery in their practice, I answer:
            
                - Everybody places implants, even orthodontists. The
                only dentists who think endos shouldn't place
                implants are insecure implant surgeons and endodontists
                who don't really feel comfortable doing
                endo surgery.
 
                - The majority of periodontists weren't trained to place
                implants in their graduate programs either, yet they
                have done magnificent work. Weren't periodontists
                rather uncomfortable when they began to cut bone
                near maxillary sinuses and mandibular alveolar nerve
                canals? Endodontists who do apical surgery on premolars
                and molars have been there their whole careers
                and are usually unconcerned by those situations.
 
                - No patient wants to meet another specialist after
                the endodontist determines the prognosis is
                upside down.
 
                - Endodontists who can place implants offer the
                least biased specialty opinion about salvageability of
                teeth with failing RCT; whether to re-treat them or
                replace them with Ti. Including implant placement
                in my practice has been popular with my referring
                dentists from the start. New generations of
                endodontists will be trained to place implants in
                post-doctoral implant fellowships.
 
             
             
            As an aside, endodontists, please stop badmouthing
            GPs' endodontic failures, it only teaches them to refer their
            next failing cases to a periodontist or oral surgeon who will
            "tisk tisk" that root canal treatment doesn't work very well,
            conversely absolving the GP of responsibility while simultaneously
            building his implant practice. Also, please stop
            retreating loser teeth, it makes endo look like a space maintainer
            for an implant.
             
             
            To the periodontists and oral surgeons, root canal
            therapy, when done correctly, works as often as implants
            do. The majority of RCT is done by GPs with a wide
            range of talent, and that's not to mention variance in the
            specialty pool. Implant surgeons who badmouth root
            canal therapy as a procedure sound just as dumb as
            endodontists who talk down implants. Please remember
            that dentists only refer failing RCT to you. Not one of
            them has ever sent a successful RCT to a periodontist or
            an oral surgeon and said, "Hey guys! Check it out! Nice
            endo outcome, huh?" Dentists only refer RCT failures to
            their favorite implant surgeon.
             
             
            The best service for patients with failing RCT is always
            referral to an endodontic specialist with big talent, exceptional
            judgment and access to a cone beam CT machine.
            Ideally, when the prognosis may be upside-down, refer your
            patient to an endodontic specialist with talent, judgment,
            3D imaging and an equal love of implant surgery.
             
             
            Root canal therapy can be done through remarkably
            conservative access cavity preparations and it has never been
            easier to treat root canal systems to their full apical and lateral
            extents (Fig. 1). An experienced endodontist can,
            through conventional and surgical means, definitively
            resolve disease states inside teeth without destroying the
            structural integrity of the abutment (Figs. 2a-b).
             
             
            Conclusion
             
             
            The time has come for endodontists to think of
            themselves as understructure specialists, rather than dentists
            with a specialty certificate who only do non-surgical
            re-treatment procedure that many GPs assume they can
            do themselves. If you want to be a specialist, be special
            (Figs. 3a-b).  
             
             |