In a down economy, many businesses look at ways to save
money for the bottom line. When price pressures increase, new
players enter the fray to offer a cheaper but not always better product
option. This is certainly true in dentistry, both on the clinical
and laboratory side. Dentistry is a wide open market for "graymarket"
products due to the number of distributors globally.
It's important for dentists and dental laboratories to take the
time to know who you are working with in terms of a vendor relationship
and also have a keen understanding of the pitfalls of buying
materials or equipment at a price that is "too good to be true."
There is a distinction between black-market and gray-market
products. Black-market products are those that are stolen or are
flying under the radar in terms of regulatory compliance such as
FDA registration.
Gray goods are genuine goods that the manufacturer sells
abroad but are then imported into the U.S. without the manufacturer's
permission. The goods often are sold on the Internet or by
unauthorized wholesalers, sometimes at prices below the manufacturer's
U.S. prices.
There is a correlation between black- and gray-market products;
in either case it might not meet FDA registration requirements or
other compliance standards for use in the domestic market.
A good example of this is, in January of this year, U.S.
Marshals, acting under a court order sought by the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), seized all dental devices from Rite-
Dent Manufacturing Corporation, located in Hialeah, Florida.
The seizure of dentistry products valued at $208,910 followed
an FDA inspection that found significant deficiencies in the company's
manufacturing processes that might have affected the safety
and effectiveness of the products.
The seized products included alginate impression material,
ultra impression material, enamel bonding system, pit and fissure
chemical curing sealant, tooth-shade resin material, cavity varnish,
polycarboxylate (PCA) cement and zinc phosphate cement, all
used in the practice of dentistry.
FDA inspections of the Rite-Dent facility, most recently in
November 2010, revealed continuing significant deviations from
the current good manufacturing practice requirements for the
products. FDA's recent inspection also confirmed that the company
had not obtained FDA marketing approval or clearance for a
device called the Ultra Impression System. (Editor's note: For more
on this seizure, please visit: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/
PressAnnouncements/ucm237894.htm)
Gray-market distributors are able to purchase products abroad
normally well below the wholesale cost of their U.S. counterparts.
Manufacturers might sell like-products cheaper overseas because
the gray products (a) might not come with the standard U.S. warranty;
(b) might contain cheaper components; and (c) might not
meet U.S. safety and/or environmental standards.
Because gray products might materially differ from domestic
goods, including quality control, product characteristics, labeling
and other key elements, a dentist or dental laboratory might be
disappointed by the quality of the gray products. If there is a material
or mechanical defect, you could be left holding the bag in
terms of lost chairtime for remakes, repairs and or other liability.
The accounting firm KPMG (www.kpmg.com) estimates
that the gray-market costs the information technology industry
more than $40 billion in annual sales alone. To date, there are no
definitive statistics on how much gray market affects dentistry.
In the Journal of the American Dental Association article "Are
You Using Gray Market Counterfeit Dental Products," Dr.
Gordon J. Christensen shared programs by key manufacturers
such as 3M ESPE, Dentsply and Kerr to combat the increasing
gray market presence in dentistry. You can find gray-market
products in almost every product category from materials (i.e.
CAD/CAM blocks, porcelain, alloys, hand pieces) to equipment.
Dental manufacturers can use trademark and patent law to defeat
the gray market. In fact, the argument for stopping gray-market
medical devices is much stronger than the argument for stopping
gray-market consumer products such as food and cosmetics.
The Lanham Act is a federal regulation that exists to help
combat gray-market products. Unlike black-market products,
gray products may be lawfully sold in the United States if they are
identical to their U.S. equivalent. Gray goods that are materially
different, however, might violate § 32, 42, or 43 of the Lanham
Act, and, thus, cannot be sold in the United States.
To hide the fact that they are selling gray products at well
below retail prices, gray marketers often do not list prices but
request prospect customers to telephone or e-mail for the price.
When asked about product serial numbers or FDA registration
information, gray sellers often claim that such information is
not available.
Courts have found the following differences in gray goods
material: (a) altered or obliterated serial numbers; (b) non-English
language instructions, manuals or labels; (c) a significantly reduced
price from that of the U.S. exclusive distributor and/or sold without
the standard, comprehensive U.S. warranty; and (d) physical
differences, including packaging and/or product composition. All
of these areas are currently regulated for dental materials and
equipment through the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 801
and 820) and enforced by the Food and Drug Administration.
The National Association of Dental Laboratories through its
general counsel, Reed Smith law firm headquartered in
Washington, D.C., has published a guide, Legal Relationships of
Dental Laboratories. It is worth noting a chapter of that guide
relative to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
UCC Section 2-301 defines the basic obligations of the sales
relationship as follows: the seller, or dental laboratory, must transfer
and deliver, and the buyer, or dentist, must accept and pay, "all
in accordance with the contract." Section 2-601 purportedly gives
the buyer the right to reject the goods delivered in that they fail to
conform "in any respect" to the agreement. This includes compliance
with implied warranties of fitness and merchantability.
Implied warranties with respect to observable defects are
waived when the dentist has examined the goods as fully as
desired or has refused to examine the goods at all. Likewise, the
parties have the power to modify or eliminate implied warranties.
Second, and more importantly, when a nonconforming product
is rejected, the seller has a limited right to cure the defect.
Furthermore when a reasonable time for rejection has elapsed,
acceptance of goods is presumed and risk of loss for discoverable
defects shifts to the dentist.
The code provides a full range of remedies for breach of contract
to both the dentist and the laboratory. A dentist confronted
with the laboratory's breach is entitled to return the defective
goods, enter another contract to purchase a substitute and then to
recover damages for the substitution. This right is subject to a
laboratory's right to cure, however. Alternatively, a dentist faced
with a breach of warranty may keep the defective appliance and
recover the difference between the value of the item accepted and
the value if it had been as warranted.
Case in point as it relates to gray-market products, is who is
liable in the supply chain if something goes wrong? Is it the dentist
who writes the prescription and seeks a material that might not
meet U.S. requirements; is it the dental laboratory who tries out a
"new vendor" in order to deliver a desired price point to keep their
dentist account happy? Depending on the scenario, it could be
either or both. In either situation, if the manufacturer can prove
that gray-market products were used, they are likely under no
obligation to remedy the situation. |