
All of us were taught to irrigate endodontic cases in dental school; however,
where and when we went to dental school likely shaped our irrigation protocols. If
you discuss the methods of irrigation with practicing dentists, you will find a
diverse set of irrigants being used in a multitude of different ways. It is my hope
that after reading this article, you will have a better perspective on the reasoning
behind the use of certain irrigants, benefits and drawbacks of different solutions
and an awareness of some of the clinical adjuncts available to assist in irrigating the
root canal system.
Irrigation has been performed in conjunction with endodontic therapy for
many years. One of the primary reasons for irrigating the root canal system is to
ensure cleanliness of the canals prior to obturation. This cleanliness involves both
elimination of microorganisms and removal of organic matter. To this end, sodium
hypochlorite has gained widespread popularity in the endodontic community. It is
easily obtained, affordable in large quantities, has superior antibacterial capabilities
and provides lubrication and tissue dissolution as well. In the most common commercially
available form, the pH of sodium hypochlorite is near 12. During the
treatment of a root canal, the increase in pH likely creates a microenvironment that
is not particularly hospitable to bacteria in the root canal system. Unfortunately, it
can create severe problems if it is extruded past the apex of the tooth.
The smear layer is composed of both organic and inorganic components. This
layer is created as a result of our efforts to instrument and disinfect the canal system.
A number of solutions have been created to attempt to remove the smear
layer. EDTA is the most well-known agent used for this reason. EDTA does not
possess significant antibacterial properties. However, the use of EDTA clears dentinal
tubules, ensuring that bacteria and bacterial byproducts are exposed to the rest
of our irrigating solutions. There are a number of other agents that have been used
to treat the smear layer as well.
The first agent, citric acid, is commercially available in a wide range of concentrations.
BioPure MTAD (Dentsply Tulsa Dental) is a solution that is commercially available
for root canal irrigation. It is a mixture of citric acid, doxycylcline and a detergent.
It has shown both antibacterial activity as well as the ability to remove the smear layer.
SmearClear (SybronEndo) is another commercially available solution used in
root canal irrigation. This is composed of 17 percent EDTA combined with surfactants.
This solution has been shown to effectively remove the smear layer as well. It
is thought that the surfactants further enhance the effectiveness of the cleaning process. Both EDTA and citric acid have also been used to facilitate the removal of
calcium hydroxide from the root canal system, when this medicament has been used.
Hydrogen peroxide was used for many years as an endodontic irrigant. When
combined with sodium hypochlorite it creates effervescence, which was thought to
facilitate debris removal. In addition, the idea that peroxide acts as an oxidizing
agent was extremely attractive to many dental professionals. Unfortunately, at high
concentrations, hydrogen peroxide is not well tolerated in the body and might play
a role in the development of cervical resorption. There is not a great deal of evidence
supporting the use of hydrogen peroxide as an endodontic irrigant.
Water is used by some practitioners as an irrigant, as is local anesthetic. Both
are bio-compatible solutions, but offer no other benefits when compared with the
other solutions listed above. I personally will use saline during the nonsurgical root
canal therapy, but strictly as a means by which I can dilute and facilitate removal
of other irrigants.
Chlorhexidine is an antibiotic solution commercially available for dental use.
While it has been used for many years as a 0.12 percent solution known as Peridex,
it is used in endodontics at two percent. It is highly antimicrobial, is known for its
long-lasting effectiveness even after the removal of the solution and it does not provide
any tissue dissolving properties. In addition, it is a highly reactive molecule,
which creates problems when used in a multiple-irrigant regimen.
When sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine are mixed, an orange-brown
precipitate known as para-chloroaniline is formed. It has been proposed that this
agent might be carcinogenic, although that has not been substantiated. This precipitate
is seen clinically as a difficult-to-remove, orange-brown film on tooth
structure where the reaction occurs. As a highly reactive molecule, chlorhexidine
also reacts with EDTA forming a precipitate that is whitish in color. The nature of
this precipitate is not well known. In order to minimize interactions, I use three
methods in varying combinations: high volume flush with saline, paper points
and micro-suction. Used in combination, you can minimize the interactions.
Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, due to the complexities of the root canal
system, some of these precipitates will form if you use these irrigants.
Irrigation is traditionally delivered to the canal system using an irrigating syringe
and tip. In addition, the use of gutta percha points with a pumping motion to assist
in dispersing irrigants has also been used. The EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa
Dental) is a device designed to sonically activate irrigants. It is battery operated,
handheld and easily transported in the dental office. Over the years, the idea of energizing
the irrigants, particularly sodium hypochlorite, has also been suggested. The use of ultrasonic energy has been shown to increase canal cleanliness. Ultrasonic
energy can be delivered by using IrriSafe (Satelec) ultrasonic tips, as well as by the use
of the PiezoFlow (Dentsply Tulsa Dental). This device allows for ultrasonic activation
of an irrigating tip, through which the irrigant of choice is dispensed.
Sodium hypochlorite is a widely used irrigant. However, if not handled properly
the outcome can be a sodium hypochlorite accident. This can involve significant
morbidity for the patient. In the interest of avoiding such a negative experience, it is
strongly advised that practitioners pay close attention to working length, ensuring
that the irrigation needle remain within the prepared canal. It is also important that
the needle not be bound in the canal, but rather constantly be moved in and out of
the canal. Side-vented needles assist in preventing the extrusion of irrigants beyond
the most apical aspect of the needle tip. Finally, it is the responsibility of the dentist
to avoid using excessive injection pressure while irrigating the canals.
When performing nonsurgical root canal therapy in my practice, I use full
strength sodium hypochlorite from initial access until I complete canal preparation.
Because we are dealing with canal systems that are irregular, I want to
facilitate the movement of irrigants into the fins, crevices and anatomical
anomalies that are untouched by instrumentation. For this reason, I will
use the EndoActivator at various stages of canal preparation, depending
on the circumstances. While no minimum amount of irrigant has been
established, frequent replenishing of sodium hypochlorite in addition to
the flushing action of active irrigation both assist with tissue dissolution.
At the conclusion of canal preparation, I will rinse the canals with
copious saline, remove the excess by microcannula and dry the remaining
solution using paper points. An application of 17 percent EDTA is
performed, followed by another rinse with saline. This is then followed
by the use of the PiezoFlow with sodium hypochlorite as the irrigant. I
like to use a minimum of 20cc of solution per canal in this device. After
micro-evacuation of each canal system, canal drying is confirmed using paper
points. This is followed by the completion of the case. In the event that the case is
treated with multiple visits, the use of the PiezoFlow is followed by drying in the
method described above followed by placement of calcium hydroxide.
Irrigation is an often overlooked, but vital part of nonsurgical root canal therapy.
While there are a number of solutions to choose from, it is up to each individual
operator to develop and understand their irrigation protocol. This will allow
the dentist to alter the protocol when necessary, but still achieve the biological
objectives consistent with superior endodontic care. It is also worthwhile to evaluate
the clinical adjuncts now available to assist us on our quest for cleaner root
canals and better long-term outcomes.
|