
Treating failed long-span bridges presents unique challenges
for the clinician and the patient. When anchor abutment teeth
fail, and it is recommended that the bridge be removed, often it
can no longer be supported by natural teeth. The treatment
option to replace the missing dentition would consist of a removable-
type prosthesis, or an implant-retained restoration. Most
patients do not want to be without teeth for an extended amount
of time and desire the option which most closely replaces their
missing teeth – a fixed prosthesis. In fact, many patients are now
aware of treatment options which would allow for removal of the
failing bridge and anchor teeth, followed by the immediate placement
of dental implants to maintain an immediate transitional
restoration. However, in order to present this treatment option to
the patient, proper diagnosis and treatment planning is essential
for a complete understanding of the available bone, soft tissue,
opposing occlusion, vertical dimension and surrounding vital
structures. Current two-dimensional panoramic and periapical
radiographs can no longer be considered the most accurate diagnostic
imaging modalities available.
To properly assess the patient's anatomy, I recommend a
three-dimensional assessment utilizing Cone Beam CT scan
(CBCT) technology, which empowers the clinician with new
tools to make educated decisions regarding the plan of treatment.
Case Presentation
A 61-year-old male patient presented with pain and mobility
in an existing posterior right mandibular long-span fixed
bridge. A routine diagnostic work-up was completed, including
periapical radiographs and study casts. The patient had a history
of bruxism, which may have been contributory to the root fractures
and mobility of the bridge. Radiographic loss of bone was
evident around the mandibular second molar tooth, the terminal
abutment for the fixed bridge, which exhibited a significant
angular defect on the mesial (Fig. 1). The first bicuspid had previously
been treated with root canal therapy, and appeared to be
fractured from the stress of the restoration or recurrent decay
along the margins. In order to determine the potential treatment
alternatives, a CBCT scan was ordered to allow complete
inspection of the three-dimensional bony topography, and the
relationship of adjacent vital structures. Two-dimensional imaging
modalities could not provide an adequate interpretation of
the patient anatomy, raising the risk of treatment and potential
injury to vital structures.
CBCT technology allows
for an accumulation of data
to accurately determine educated
treatment decisions.
There are four important
three-dimensional views: (1)
axial, (2) cross-sectional, (3)
panoramic, and (4) 3D reconstructions (Fig. 2a). Each of these views are individually important
and when assimilated in total, due to the interactive nature
of the CBCT viewing software, provides the ultimate overview
of the patient's anatomic presentation. The data can be visualized
utilizing interactive treatment planning software applications
which have innovative tools to aid in the diagnosis and
treatment planning. I have long advocated the concept "It's not
the scan, it's the plan," meaning the clinician must evaluate the
data provided by the CBCT machine. Once the scan is taken,
it can be viewed on the computer workstation using the native
software, or the DICOM data can be exported into an interactive
treatment planning software where all available images can
be processed and manipulated interactively to create an excellent
diagnostic environment (Fig. 2b).
Three-Dimensional Planning
The panoramic image reconstructed from the CBCT dataset
differs substantially from a conventional panoramic radiograph.
This nondistorted image can be viewed interactively using the
incorporated viewing software to assess the broader aspects of the
arches (Fig. 3). The cross-sectional image is excellent for defining
a slice of the mandible
where the height and width
of the bone can be accurately
evaluated. Within an individual
slice, the spatial location
of the tooth and root
can be appreciated (Fig. 4a).
The facial, lingual cortical
and intermedullary bone can
be visualized based upon their radiopacity or grayscale density
values. Nuances within the anatomical presentation can be
assessed with greater accuracy than with any other imaging
modality. Simulated implants can be placed in a position to
effectively support the desired restoration, even with close proximity
to the mental foramen (Fig. 4b). The cross-sectional slice
of the posterior molar reveals the significant bone defect surrounding the apical roots (Fig. 5). There was cortical bone below
the root apex, and the significant lingual concavity was noted.
The inferior alveolar nerve can be carefully traced through the
mandible to determine proximity to the tooth roots and potential
implant receptor sites (orange). Although there was good quality
bone above the location of the nerve, there was insufficient bone
to adequately fixate an implant. It was therefore elected to extract
the molar tooth and fill the defect with grafting material in anticipation
of placing an implant after the new bone had matured.
Creating a fully interactive three-dimensional reconstruction
from the CBCT scan data allows the clinician further
insight into the patient's existing anatomical presentation.
Utilizing advanced software masking or segmentation enables
the various anatomical entities to be separated for improved
diagnostic capabilities. The pre-existing bridge has been colorized
(magenta) as have the adjacent molar and cuspid teeth
(white) (Fig. 6). Simulated implants were positioned within
the bone to support a new fixed restoration based upon the
abutment projections which extended above the occlusal table
(Fig. 7). Using advances in interactive software, "selective
transparency" can be applied to change the opacity of various
structures to aid in the diagnosis and planning phase.
Accurate placement of realistic implants is enhanced by masking
the adjacent tooth roots. The path of the inferior alveolar
nerve can also be fully appreciated. Note the planned parallelism
of the four simulated implants (Fig. 8). If the pre-existing
restoration could not be physically removed in advance of
CT/CBCT imaging and the old occlusion was found to be
unfavorable, through further masking or segmentation, it is
now possible to build a virtual occlusion using interactive
treatment planning software. "Virtual teeth" (seen in yellow)
can correct discrepancies, and allow for an ideal simulated
morphology fabrication. The large defect around the molar
was significant, and it was determined that it could not be
used as a receptor site initially. It was elected to graft this site,
and return in five months to place a single implant in the
molar site. Once the plan has been verified in all four available
3D views, a virtual template can be fabricated based upon the
implant positions (Fig. 9). Therefore, the final surgical template
is only as good as the virtual plan.
There are three basic CT-derived template types which can
be fabricated for dental implant placement: (1) bone borne, (2)
tooth-borne, and (3) soft-tissue borne. Based upon the fact that
there were adjacent teeth in the region, it was elected to utilize a
tooth-borne template stabilized by the existing occlusion. The
CBCT scan data was sent via e-mail for fabrication of a stereolithographic
model (Fig. 10).¹ This model is a replica of the
patient's anatomy at the time that the images were acquired. The
pre-existing bridge was removed via the software prior to fabrication
of the surgical guide. The template adapts well to the surrounding
dentition and does not require further fixation to
prevent movement. The stainless steel tubes 0.2mm are wider
than the manufacturers' sequential osteotomy drills.
My novel modality utilizes a CT-derived stereolithographic
model-based approach to link the implant placement and the
eventual restoration. Implant replicas, or analogs were placed in
pre-designated implant receptors on the stereolithographic partially
edentate mandible (Fig. 11). In order to accommodate the
immediate restoration, manufacturers' specific abutments were
placed on the implant replicas. Note the interimplant distances
for proper embrasure design. A diagnostic wax-up was accomplished
and a clear matrix fabricated to facilitate the fabrication
of a provisional prosthesis. Stock, 3inOne (BioHorizons) titanium abutments were positioned on the implant replicas to
support the temporary restoration (Fig. 12a). The processed
four-unit transitional acrylic bridge was supported by the
implant abutments (Fig.
12b). As the molar site
would not receive an
implant immediately, a
distal cantilever pontic
was required. The actual
implants, as simulated in
the virtual plan, were chosen
in advance, as well as
how to best position the
implants to take advantage of the reverse buttress thread
design, coronal microchannels and internal hexagonal connection
design features. The tapered internal implants with the
Laser-Lok microchannels allow for the implants to be placed in
a "transitional" position where the lingual cortical plate is
higher than the facial cortical plate of bone (Fig. 13).

Surgical Intervention
The occlusal view of the failing long-span bridge can be
seen in Fig. 14a. Once the failed restoration was removed, the
underlying fractured tooth roots were assessed. The volumetric
change in the pontic areas was assessed by comparing the
facial lingual dimensions of the molar and bicuspid with the
pontic area with diminished keratinized tissue (Fig 14b). All of
the planning decisions had been made prior to the surgical
intervention except the design of the flap to expose the underlying
alveolar ridge. To preserve the keratinized tissue, a full
thickness muco-periosteal flap was required, followed by
extraction of the two natural abutment teeth (Fig. 15). The
tooth-borne template was then placed over the site and examined
for fit (Fig. 16). As per the CBCT-derived plan and template,
the first three implants were placed. The implants were
well fixated allowing for immediate restoration by aligning the
internal hexagonal connection to the facial with the attached 3inOne abutments (Fig. 17).
The posterior molar extraction
socket was filled with a
cortico-cancellous mineralized
bone graft material (Miner-Oss, BioHorizons).
The prefabricated four-unit
provisional restoration was seated and relined to fit the three
anterior implant fixtures. The distal-extension cantilever replaced
the missing molar with care taken not to place pressure on the
underlying graft. The soft tissue was sutured to allow for near
primary closure as they were wrapped around the abutment
projection while helping to establish embrasures (Fig. 18). The
postoperative periapical radiograph confirms the placement of
the anterior three implants and the bone graft in the molar defect
(Fig. 19). The transitional restoration was cemented, retained
and left in place for more than two months. Once the posterior
molar bone graft had matured, the fourth implant was placed
according to the original CBCT plan. When the fourth implant
had integrated after eight weeks in function, an abutment was
connected, and the existing transitional restoration was relined.
Impressions were made and a soft tissue working cast fabricated
for the laboratory process. The favorable parallelism afforded by
the CBCT-derived planning required only minor preparation of
the implant abutments to allow for adequate clearance for the
metal alloy and porcelain veneer (Fig. 20).
Due to the patient's bruxism, it was elected to splint the posterior
three units within the framework of the ceramo-metal
restoration, while the anterior, longer implant was fabricated as
a single unit. The bisque-bake try-in revealed improved soft
tissue contours and emergence profile (Fig. 21).
The completed ceramo-metal units seen in the periapical
radiographs show nice parallelism and interimplant distances
(Fig. 22). The emergence profile of each implant illustrates a
smooth transition important to long-term maintenance. The
final glaze and porcelain characteristics of the posterior four
units blend in nicely with the surrounding dentition and soft tissue
(Fig. 23). Note the excellent adaptation of the embrasures.
The purpose of this case presentation is to illustrate the
enhanced diagnostic and treatment planning capabilities of
CBCT data combined with interactive treatment planning software.
The combination of careful diagnosis with proper planning
aides the clinician in understanding existing bone
topography, bone density, adjacent tooth roots, lingual concavities,
occlusion, and the path of the inferior alveolar nerve. Once
the information has been gathered, an accurate plan can be
established. This plan will then be transferred to a surgical
guide, allowing for precise implant placement. In a phased
approach, three initially placed implants were immediately
loaded with a transitional cantilever restoration, while avoiding
the lingual concavity and within a zone of safety above the inferior
alveolar nerve. The posterior molar tooth with resulting
socket defect was found to be unfavorable for implant fixation,
and therefore site development was accomplished with bone
grafting. This was anticipated and documented preoperatively
after interpretation of the CBCT data. Once matured, the molar
area became an excellent implant receptor site. The patient was
given a transitional restoration the day of surgery, although there
was a staged approach and delayed implant placement in the
molar area. This case represented one treatment alternative to
replacing a failed long-span mandibular and bridge which was
made possible through CBCT scan technology, interactive treatment
planning software and CT-derived surgical templates to
guide the placement of the implants based upon the restorative
needs of the patient.
References
1. Materialise Dental, Lueven, Belgium
|