

by Trisha E. O'Hehir, RDH, MS, Editorial Director, Hygienetown
Dr. Jeffrey Hillman is a quiet, thoughtful man who is curious
about science and has the innate ability to objectively assess a situation
or a scientific accident. He says it's because he doesn't
study it in depth, but rather sees things from a global perspective.
Take opera for instance. He enjoys the music, lyrics and acting
for pure enjoyment. Taking it all apart, understanding the theory,
separating each instrument and voice to study it in detail changes
the focus and also takes the enjoyment and pleasure out of the
experience. In science, Dr. Hillman focuses on the possibilities of
what can be learned from experiments gone wrong, not simply
on following the steps of an experiment to an expected outcome.
He values each experiment gone wrong as the opportunity to
raise or answer another question, perhaps not the question he
was asking at that moment. The accidents that Dr. Hillman has
pursued in his career have led to some amazing discoveries that
have the potential to eliminate caries and periodontal disease and
replace antibiotics for treating serious infections.
Dr. Hillman's work didn't start with oral probiotics. The
foundation was laid with 25 years of research on genetically
altered Streptococcus mutans to create a one-time replacement
technology, SMaRT, to replace the oral bacteria responsible for
dental caries with bacteria that don't produce lactic acid. Along
the way, other discoveries were made. With the SMaRT replacement
technology came the discovery of a novel lantibiotic produced
by bacteria to destroy other bacteria. Discovering a
platform to synthetically create lantibiotics might in fact replace
the antibiotics that are currently failing. Oral probiotics are far
from the end of Dr. Hillman's discoveries. Several new technologies
are being investigated in the Oragenics lab today. He's pursuing
a new direction in disease diagnosis based on rapidly
identifying protein targets released from cells undergoing
change. His team is also working on an exciting discovery that
will impact one of the most serious medical problems we face
today – obesity. They've discovered a natural molecule that can
be taken orally to induce programmed cell death in fat cells.
Having read Dr. Hillman's research for many years, it was a
pleasure to personally talk with him about his many discoveries,
and the accidents leading to some of those discoveries.
Dr. Hillman, where did your research start?
Hillman: Prior to dental school, I worked in the lab of my
first mentor, microbiologist Rob Gibbons, studying bacterial
attachment to surfaces. At the time, no one could explain why
you find certain types of bacteria on the teeth but not on the
mucosa, and other types of bacteria that behaved in the opposite
fashion. Gibbons thought there might be an enzyme in saliva
that was responsible for the selective attachment. Without
knowing much about bacteria, I discovered instead that the
selectivity of attachment was a feature that is intrinsic to the bacteria.
My work indicated that bacteria have surface molecules
that interact very specifically with molecules on the enamel pellicle
or on the surfaces of mucosal cells, a sort of lock-and-key type
mechanism. The specificity of bacterial attachment has
provoked a lot of research over the subsequent years, since the
prospect of preventing diseases by preventing initial attachment
of bacterial pathogens to surfaces seems so appealing.
Unfortunately, it appears that bacteria typically have multiple
attachment mechanisms, so there haven't been any landmark
successes using this approach to date.
How did you get started with replacement technology?
Hillman: It was an accidental discovery
two weeks after beginning work in molecular
genetics at Forsyth in the 1970s. I had a grant
to study attachment of bacteria to tooth surfaces.
I was repeating a protocol on a strain of Strep. Mutans that I used as a graduate student
to chemically alter the genes of E. coli. For an
indication of mutagenesis, I was looking for
unusual appearing colonies on a particular
type of cultivation medium, which happened
to contain a pH indicator. Among the many small, white acid-producing
colonies, I noticed several large red colonies, and
wondered what they were. I determined that they did not produce
lactic acid. At the time, most people working in the area of
dental caries believed that lactic acid production by Strep.
mutans was directly responsible for dental caries, the so-called
Acidogenic Theory of decay. It occurred to me that a lactic acid-deficient
mutant of Strep. mutans offered the perfect opportunity
to test this theory. Once I showed that these mutants did
not cause decay, and thus proved the Acidogenic Theory, the
idea of using them to prevent tooth decay through replacement
therapy dawned on me. This dramatically changed the focus of
my research from bacterial attachment to finding a replacement
bacteria for the oral cavity, but not without some resistance from
my grant supervisor. Luckily, he agreed to allow my grant to take
a new direction that started the journey to these exciting new
discoveries we have today.
Your work on SMaRT took 25 years. What kept
you going for so long is this direction?
Hillman: The process was never boring; it was challenging
and exciting. My focus was on answering questions about how
to achieve the potential for what I saw as possible in my early
research, that of eliminating dental disease by replacing the disease-
causing bacteria in the mouth with genetically altered bacteria.
There were several quantum leaps in the process that were
very exciting. First, finding a starting strain of Strep. mutans for
this work, which had a selective advantage over all other strains
of this species, took several wrong turns and four or five years to
achieve. Next, it took several years to figure out how to eliminate
the ability of these cells to produce lactic acid. The problem
here was the discovery that elimination of lactic acid production
killed our strain because it created metabolic problems for the
cells. This problem was overcome using recombinant DNA
methods, which we developed specifically for this problem, but
which are now in widespread use for a variety of applications.
The result is the SMaRT strain that is genetically modified to
produce no lactic acid, and it also produces an antibiotic that
kills all lactic acid producing strains of Strep. mutans. Each step
of the process led to our goal, but there were also interesting
observations that we selectively pursued. These led to other
exciting discoveries, like our lead antibiotic, MU1140.
Although it took many years to achieve the SMaRT strain, the
process along the way was interesting and rewarding.
Tell me about lantibiotics.
Hillman: Lantibiotics are potent antibiotics produced naturally
by bacteria. The first lantibiotic was discovered in 1927,
Nisin, and 50 others have been discovered since then.
Today we have many health-care associated infections and
many are antibiotic resistant; for example methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus
faecalis (VRE), and Clostridium difficile (C. Diff). This is a
serious problem that continues to require newer and more powerful
antibiotics.
In our work with the SMaRT strain, we discovered it naturally
produces a potent antibiotic, which we call MU1140, that
is active against all gram-positive bacteria. We developed a new
organic chemistry technology to produce a synthetic lantibiotic,
MU1140-S. This lantibiotic will potentially replace Vancomycin
and Daptomycin, the current drugs of last resort for serious
health-care associated infections, which are currently failing.
Are other synthetic lantibiotics being produced?
Hillman: No, we're the first to figure out how to make these
unusual molecules. Until now, standard fermentation methods
have been unable to produce even enough material to test any of
the 50 known lantibiotics as therapeutic agents for use in fighting
infections and diseases. The unique chemical structure of lantibiotics
prevents the necessary purification needed for clinical testing.
In order to produce large amounts of MU1140-S, we developed
a novel organic chemistry synthesis platform known as
DPOLT. This new technology will make it possible to synthetically
produce any of the 50 known lantibiotics.
How did you move from your work on SMaRT
replacement technology to oral probiotics?
Hillman: In the early 1980s I attended a lecture given by
Dr. Sig Socransky. I was intrigued by what he said about bacteria
and periodontal disease. He said everyone has bacteria in
their mouths that can cause periodontal diseases, but not everyone
experiences the disease, at least not to the extent that they
theoretically could. That made me wonder if perhaps there were
bacteria normally present in plaque that inhibit the growth of
the bacteria that cause disease. I talked with him about this after
the lecture and asked him for plaque samples from healthy and
diseased periodontal sites. Within two weeks, I had the answer – good bacteria were missing in the mouths of those with periodontal
disease. We had other evidence that the good bacteria
would disappear from a site before it started to break down, possibly
because certain pathogens are known to produce an antibiotic-
like molecule that specifically kills them.
Unfortunately, the idea of simply recolonizing a host with
periodontal disease with the good bacteria proved to be ineffective:
the good bacteria would disappear very quickly following
their introduction, and we couldn't figure out what we needed
to do to help them persistently colonize. This work was put on
the back burner until I attended a meeting in Amsterdam in the
late 1990s. It wasn't a lecture this time that caught my attention,
it was the attendees lining up for the lunch buffet. Each person
took a little bottle of something and drank it after lunch. It was
a probiotic to promote GI health. The fact that an entire population
was willing to take a probiotic daily changed my thinking
from a one-time treatment, such as we plan for SMaRT, to the
potential for a daily oral probiotic that would deliver good bacteria
to the mouth. Probiotics have been around for centuries for
balancing the microflora in the lower alimentary canal to favor
health. I simply moved this centuries-old concept up to the
mouth. The result is ProBiora3.
What is ProBiora3 and how does it work?
Hillman: ProBiora3 contains three naturally occurring
strains of beneficial bacteria, including Streptococcus oralis,
Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus rattus. When taken daily,
these good bacteria change the balance of bacteria in the mouth
to favor health. We focused on bacteria to promote dental and
periodontal health, but found a few beneficial side effects – fresher breath and whiter teeth. The good bacteria inhibit the
growth of bacteria that produce volatile sulfur-containing
compounds and they release hydrogen peroxide that whitens
the teeth. ProBiora3 is found in EvoraPro, EvoraPlus and
EvoraKids. These flavored probiotic tablets are dissolved in the
mouth twice daily after regular brushing. EvoraPro is taken for
ten days after seeing the hygienist, followed by regular use of
EvoraPlus. We also have an oral probiotic for pets, Teddy's Pride,
a powder that's sprinkled on a pet's food once per day.
Now that ProBiora3 is available commercially,
what other things are you working on besides
bringing SMaRT through all the complex FDA
regulations?
Hillman: There are several other technologies we're working
on, including two of particular interest – diagnostics and weight
loss. While searching for protein targets associated with periodontal
disease diagnosis we discovered a way to identify proteins
that are released into body fluids when a cell undergoes any
sort of change. These so-called shed proteins are excellent targets
for medical diagnostics and for developing therapeutic strategies.
Using blood, saliva or urine, the technology we developed is able
to identify proteins shed from diseased tissues and cancers. This
technology has already proven its ability to identify protein targets
for Vibrio cholera, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
and now we're working on Mycobacterium tuberculosis and
bowel cancer.
Obesity has increased significantly in recent years and is
responsible for serious medical problems in our country with
large public health costs, so the potential for the work we are
doing on weight loss is exciting. We have identified LPT3-04, a
natural substance, which, when taken orally, targets fat cells to
undergo programmed cell death.
The new technologies we've discovered are not all the result
of experiments working out just as we expect. Accidents happen
every day. Remaining open to those accidents and selecting
which of the failed experiments are the right ones to pursue is
the challenge. In dentistry, I see my work as part of a change
from "sick care" to "health care," providing people with easy,
safe and reliable ways to prevent oral diseases.
Conclusion:
A lot goes into the development of a product like the oral
probiotic, Evora, or soon the SMaRT replacement technology.
Many years, many experiments and a few lucky accidents are
needed to transform the idea to eliminate dental disease into
exciting new technologies to do just that.
|