“Reconstructive dentistry” is probably the broadest and most inclusive term
used to describe the concept of replacing, rebuilding or creating the elements and
relationships between teeth, the upper and lower jaws and overall facial structures.
In order to provide this type of reconstructive dental treatment, the goal of the
provider is to utilize a wide variety of dental services, such as restorative, endodontic,
periodontic, implant and prosthetic care to produce the precise outcome desired
by the patient. In fact, I recently started the Reconstructive Dentistry Institute in
Michigan, where general dentists come to train in the various services necessary to
rebuild a dentition to proper form and function. For those dentists who do not
want to incorporate this type of service, specialists would be involved to provide a
team approach for this type of patient care.
Many patients have put off treatment due to the economy. When they finally
return to the dentist, they have a variety of multiple problems that need attention
and care. These problems might require root canals, scaling and root planing,
extractions, grafting, fillings or implant placement. In my practice, we are able to
address all these concerns utilizing oral or IV sedation within a couple of appointments,
whereas before they would be referred out to various specialties and have
taken more time or multiple visits. In other words, patients who have the least
amount of time for what seems to be a considerable amount of dentistry (multiple
implants or reconstructive procedures) are accommodated with special appointments. Our office’s ability to schedule these appointment blocks enables patients
with overflowing work schedules or active lifestyles to obtain needed treatments
with the least amount of visits and the least inconvenience.
This article describes a case where the patient needed several dental services
within the various disciplines of dentistry to fulfill his demands for an aesthetic and
functional smile. In my practice and dental lectures, I have described this treatment
as the “Ultimate Dental Treatment.” This article will illustrate an efficient and
effective approach in preparation, bonding, implants, prosthetics and more!
Case Presentation
A man in his late 50s presented to the practice dissatisfied with the appearance
of his smile (Fig. 1). He commented that he felt that his existing teeth and
restorations were unattractive because of size, shape and color. He also mentioned
that he could feel some chips in his restorations as well as broken portions of
tooth structure causing occasional discomfort.
Initial diagnostic evaluation consisted of a series of digital images with study
models, a panoramic X-ray and full set of radiographs. Upon clinical examination,
it was very evident that the patient had some failing composite and amalgam
restorations with recurrent decay (Fig. 2). According to the patient, these
restorations had been placed about 10 to 15 years prior. Overall marginal
integrity appeared to be compromised with these restorations. Examining these
restorations from the occlusal view, one could see multiple cracks and craze lines.
In the posterior maxillary and mandibular regions, there were several teeth the
patient had complained of discomfort to hot and cold as well as to biting.
Planning
To develop a treatment plan and determine if the vertical dimension could be
increased, a diagnostic wax-up was fabricated (Fig. 3). Based on information
gathered from the initial consult, it was determined that all the remaining teeth
should be cleaned of any caries, cored if necessary and crowned, and the edentulous
area of #29 restored with a dental implant. For the areas of #30 and #31 the
patient did not desire to undergo block grafting for the deficient amount of bone.
All risks, benefits and alternatives to various treatments were clearly reviewed with
the patient.
As a result of the information gathered from the diagnostic wax-up and the
patient’s desires for treatment, it was determined that restoring the entire upper
and lower dentition would enhance aesthetics and function. The final treatment
plan would consist of Noritake Katana crowns (teeth #2-15 and teeth #18-28),
core restorations where needed and implant placement of tooth #29 with corresponding
abutment and crown.
Preparation
Using a coarse grit chamfer diamond bur 856 (Axis), the teeth were prepared
for all-ceramic Noritake Katana crowns. Utilizing Expasyl (Kerr) we not only controlled hemorrhaging, but also achieved gingival retraction. After approximately
two minutes in the sulcus, the Expasyl was rinsed off with copious
amounts of water. Utilizing a full-arch tray (Pentron) and fast-set impression
material (Take One Advance, Kerr) an impression was taken for the final restorations.
The same materials and steps were utilized for the mandibular arch.
Provisionalization
A provisional restoration, which would aid in determining the best size,
shape, color and position, was made from a Siltec (Ivoclar Vivadent) impression
of the diagnostic wax-up. Using Temphase (Kerr) temporary material, this mold
was quickly filled and placed on the patient’s prepared dentition (Fig. 4). Within
minutes, the temporary was fabricated and the margins trimmed with fine trimming
burs (Axis). The next day, the patient returned for evaluation of aesthetics,
phonetics and bite. Already the patient exhibited excitement and confidence with
his provisional restorations (Fig. 5); however, he selected a whiter shade (010
Bleach Shade) for his final restorations. Information was recorded and the patient
was informed to rinse with Oris (Dentsply) chlorhexidine gluconate rinse to keep
his gingival tissues healthy.
Cementation
Before try-in of the definitive restorations to verify fit and shade, the provisional
restorations were removed sequentially starting from the maxillary anterior
region. Any remaining cement was cleaned off the prepared teeth and
bleeding from the gingival tissues controlled with Expasyl (Kerr) paste. After the
patient was shown the retracted view for acceptance, the cementation process
was initiated. The prepared dentition was cleaned with chlorohexidine 2%
(Consepsis, Ultradent Products, Inc.) for 15 seconds and rinsed to remove any
contamination during the temporary phase. The preparations were then desensitized
(Gluma, Heraeus Kulzer), and the final Katana (Noritake) crown restorations
were tried in to verify marginal fit, contour, contacts, shade and accuracy.
The patient was very satisfied with the look of his new restorations and approved
them for final cementation.
The crown restorations (Dental Arts Lab) were seated utilizing self-etching,
self-adhesive resin cement (Maxcem Elite, Kerr). Excess cement was easily
removed from the margins and accomplished within a short amount of time
before final curing with the curing light (DEMI, Kerr) for 20 seconds. No finishing
of the cement was necessary along the margins. Any adjustments to the occlusion
were achieved using the Zir-Cut Polishing Set (Axis Dental). The overall
health and structure of the soft tissue and restorations was very good (Fig. 7). The
patient was very pleased with the restorations and was now eager to start treatment
on the edentulous area of #29.
Before the surgical appointment, a CBCT scan was taken to accurately treatment
plan this case to make certain that no complications would arise from the conservative
non-flap approach. SimPlant software (Materialise Dental, Glen Burnie,
Maryland) was used through 3D Diagnostix virtual assistance to precisely plan the
placement of a 4mm x 12mm TSI (OCO Biomedical) dental implant (#29).
The area was anesthetized using 1.8ml 4% Septocaine (Septodent) with
1:100,000 epinephrine. Using the surgical guide provided by 3D Diagnostix, the
site for the implant was begun with a #8 surgical bur (Axis) in a high-speed handpiece
through the soft tissue extending approximately a millimeter into bone.
A 2.0mm pilot drill was placed into the site and advanced to a depth of
14mm measuring from the tissue surface. This additional 2mm was the same
depth of the tissue height to bone. A paralleling pin was placed in the site of the
osteotomy and an X-ray taken to check the angulations of the pin within the
mandible. Using a rotary tissue punch, provided in the kit (OCO Biomedical),
an outline was created over the initial osteotomy and the tissue plug removed
with a curette. Since there was unevenness in the ridge of bone, a countersink
drill was used to countersink the implant collar. Intermediate drills were sequentially
used in this system to work up to the final drill size due to the dense cortical
bone that was present. Once the osteotomy was completed, an implant
finger driver was used to place the dental implant until increased torque was necessary
(Fig. 8). The ratchet wrench was then connected to the adapter and the
implant torqued to final depth reaching a torque level of 55Ncm (Fig. 9). A healing
cap was hand-tightened to the implant. A post-operative radiograph was
made of the implant and the healing cap to ensure complete seating. The implant
was evaluated clinically after one week. The patient stated he had no post-operative
discomfort or swelling.
Four months later, the healing cap was removed and the implant tested with
the ISQ meter (Osstell) to ensure osseointegration. An impression was taken of
the implant using an impression post from OCO Biomedical. The impression
was captured using a full-arch tray and fast-set polyvinylsiloxane impression
material (Take One Advance, Kerr).
When the patient returned for the seating appointment the Katana (Noritake)
crown (Fig. 10) was placed on the implant/corresponding abutment and another
X-ray was taken to verify an accurate fit. Since there were no open margins and
the contacts and occlusion were good, the crown restoration was then seated
using Maxcem Elite (Kerr) cement. Once the cement reached its gel stage, it was
quickly cleaned off and any excess removed.
The patient was very pleased with the end result (Figs. 11&12) and was surprised
at how atraumatically the dental implant was placed through the gingiva
and that the whole process of his dental reconstruction was accomplished “under
one roof.”
Today, patients like to get all their services under one roof. They know, trust
and feel comfortable with their general dentist and usually prefer him/her to perform
dental procedures necessary to reach optimum dental health. I am not advocating
general dentists offer procedures they are not comfortable with or not
properly trained for. However, it is my opinion that general dentists should
implement a multi-disciplinary approach into their practices – “Ultimate Dental
Treatment.” Because of time constraints, fear of going to multiple offices and
increasing costs, patients will seek providers who are reconstructive in nature.
Author Bio |
Dr. Nazarian maintains a private practice in Troy, Michigan, with an emphasis on comprehensive and restorative care. He is a diplomate in
the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI). His articles have been published in many of today’s popular dental publications.
Dr. Nazarian is the director of the Reconstructive Dentistry Institute. He has conducted lectures and hands-on workshops on aesthetic
materials and dental implants throughout the United States, Europe, New Zealand and Australia. Dr. Nazarian is also the creator of the DemoDent
patient education model system. He can be reached at 248-457-0500 or at the Web site www.aranazariandds.com.
|
|