by Ara Nazarian, DDS
Today, more and more people are becoming aware of what cosmetic dentistry
has to offer in their every day lives. With competition in the work force due to the
limitation of available jobs, more and more people are trying to enhance their
looks to compliment their resumes. More than ever before, dentists are challenged
to create “Executive Smiles” in a fast, effective and easy method. Patients are insisting
on perfect teeth and are demanding it be done as soon as possible.
Occasionally, we are faced with the dilemma of using a rapid restorative solution
to satisfy these patient’s needs instead of traditional methods. The introduction of
adhesion dentistry has opened a realm of treatment options.
In the case presented in this article, the patient was informed of all the treatment
options and it was recommended that he consult an orthodontist. The
patient found the treatment time of 12-18 months unacceptable and insisted on
proceeding with the option of porcelain restorations. Consequently, a mutual
decision was made for minimal selective tooth reduction to achieve the result the
patient was seeking.
Case Study
A young man in his early 30s presented to the practice for an
aesthetic consultation. The patient was not pleased with his smile
and did not feel comfortable in social circumstances and in the
work force. In particular, the patient was dissatisfied with the
size, shape, spacing, and color of his anterior maxillary teeth
(Figure 1). Upon clinical examination, his anterior maxillary
teeth exhibited multiple diastemas. Although he had a Class I bite, his maxillary anterior teeth were small. In other words, the length of these teeth could tolerate widening and lengthening. After
considering the obstacles, a diagnostic wax-up was fabricated to help
visualize the solution (Figure 2). By visualizing the case on the preoperative
models, the patient was able to begin with the end result in
mind. In order to achieve the patient demands, the placement of
porcelain veneer restorations (Nano-Veneers, Burbank Dental Lab) on
teeth #7-#10 would be utilized.
Once informed consent was obtained from the patient, treatment
was initiated. Since the preparations were very conservative, no anesthetic
was necessary for margin placement. Using a #4 round diamond
bur, a slight margin was placed at the gingival margin and wrapped
around the incisal edges.
Following sequential preparation of the maxillary teeth, a stickbite
registration was taken using Take-1 Advance bite registration
(Kerr). This stick-bite would aid the technician in preparing the
model and mounting the case. It also communicated to the ceramist
the orientation of the interpupillary line so that the incisal edges of
the final restorations would not appear canted.
Utilizing a retraction paste called Expasyl Strawberry (Kerr) we not
only controlled hemorrhaging, but also achieved gingival retraction.
After approximately two minutes in the sulcus, the Expasyl was rinsed
off with copious amounts of water. Impressions were taken using a fast
setting polyvinyl material (Take-1 Advance, Kerr). Since the proposed
veneers were going to be thin, it was imperative to fabricate and bond
the temporaries over the maxillary anterior teeth (#7-#10) by spot
etching the prepared surface (Figure 3). Using a siltec matrix (Ivoclar
Vivadent) of the proposed wax-up, the provisional restorations were
fabricated using Protemp (3M) (Figure 4) then trimmed and glazed.
Laboratory Considerations
Color photographs and diagnostic data were also obtained and
forwarded to the laboratory for the fabrication of the final restorations.
During the laboratory phase, the full arch polyvinyl-siloxane
impressions were used to create a master model on which the restorations
would be based. The master model was segmented into individual
dies that were trimmed and pinned to determine the manner by
which the final restorations would integrate with the soft tissue. A silicone
incisal matrix of the wax-up was created to guide the placement
of the incisal effects and edge position in the subsequent ceramic
build-up. A shade of B-1 on the Vita Shade Guide (Vita) was selected
for the porcelain veneer restorations (Figures 5 & 6).
Cementation
Before try-in of the definitive restorations to verify fit and shade,
the provisional restorations were removed and any remaining cement
was cleaned off the prepared dentition. After the patient was shown
the retracted view for acceptance, the cementation process was initiated.
The restorations were treated with 37 percent phosphoric acid for
20 seconds, rinsed, silanated (Silane Primer, Kerr), and allowed to air dry for a minute. The prepared dentition was cleaned with
chlorohexidine 2% (Consepsis, Ultradent Products Inc.) for 15
seconds and rinsed to remove any contaminants during the temporary
phase. The preparations were etched for 10 seconds,
rinsed thoroughly and dried.
Two coats of dental adhesive (OptiBond Solo Plus, Kerr) were
placed on the preparations (Figures 7 & 8) and high-speed suction
was used to ensure that the material had evaporated. The adhesive
was light cured for 10 seconds per tooth with the LED curing
light (Demi, Kerr).
A resin luting cement (NX3, Kerr) was applied to the restorations
starting from the centrals and then the laterals (Figure 9).
The restorations were then placed on the preparations, and, while
firmly holding the restorations in place, a rubber tip applicator
removed all excess luting cement from the margins. The restorations
were tacked at the gingival margin using a small diameter
turbo tip in the Demi light (Kerr).
While the restorations were still firmly held in place, the
restored dentition was flossed and any excess luting cement was
carefully removed. When most of the excess cement was removed,
the restored dentition was completely light cured from both facial
and lingual sides. Any residual cement was removed with a No. 15
scalpel or finished with a fine diamond. After complete polymerization
of the restorations, the occlusion was verified and adjusted.
The overall health and structure of the soft tissue and restorations
were very good. The patient was extremely satisfied with the
definitive results (Figure 10).
Conclusion
Completion of this aesthetic dilemma with a quick restorative
solution satisfied the patient’s demands of straight, white teeth in
order to meet the demands of today’s job market. By using bonded
porcelain restorations (Nano-Veneers, Burbank Dental), a
substantial improvement was achieved quickly. It is important
that dentists ensure that their patients are completely informed of
all risks, benefits, and alternatives before initiating treatment. By
having patients act as partners in exploring various treatments, a
dentist will not merely meet their expectations, he or she will surpass
them (A special thanks to Burbank Dental Lab for these
beautiful restorations). |
Author's Bio |
Ara Nazarian, DDS, is a graduate of the University of Detroit-Mercy School of Dentistry. Upon graduation, he completed
an AEGD residency in San Diego, California with the United States Navy. He is a recipient of the Excellence in Dentistry
Scholarship and Award. Currently, he maintains a private practice in Troy, Michigan, with an emphasis on comprehensive
and restorative care. He has conducted lectures and hands-on workshops on aesthetic materials and mini dental implants
throughout the Untied States. Dr. Nazarian is also the creator of the DemoDent patient education model system. |
|
|