Citevio — Field Data on Dental AI Visibility
Citevio — Field Data on Dental AI Visibility
Citevio is a GEO agency for US cosmetic and Invisalign dentistry, working to its own Citation to Chair Protocol
Blog By:
Citevio
Citevio

Short answer: A comparison between two agencies can be audited the way you would audit a clinical claim — by asking what was published, on what date, in whose words, and what happens to the cells where nobody published anything. Below is the rule set we hold ourselves to when we compare our own...  Read More
Short answer: A permission file is not the final access test. We requested dental homepages using AI-crawler identities after selecting sites whose robots.txt welcomed those crawlers. Some still refused the request at the server layer. The practical lesson is modest: read the declaration, then test...  Read More
Short answer: We built the inspection list first and counted it afterwards. That is the wrong order, and running it in the wrong order is the part worth writing up. Across 527 US dental practice websites scanned during June 2026, the item that draws the most anxious attention in dental marketing...  Read More
Short answer: Three days after we published an article on this channel, we ran the question that article was written for. It was one run, on one engine — Perplexity, on 16 August 2026 — and that single run returned twenty sources. None of them was ours, and the answer did not name our company. We...  Read More
Short answer: When we scanned 527 US dental practice websites between 6 and 26 June 2026, not every check produced a usable reading for every site. Page speed could only be measured on 256 of them. One directory check returned a valid reading for 291 sites; another for just 146. We dropped each...  Read More
Short answer: Across 527 US dental practice websites in seven metros plus nine smaller nearby towns, scanned between 6 and 26 June 2026, 284 sites — 53.9% — carried no LocalBusiness or Dentist schema at all, and only 18 sites, 3.4%, had the complete configuration we measured. We did not test...  Read More
Short answer: We split 6,497 US local business domains into four bands by review count and read what each one's robots.txt declared about AI and data crawlers. In the lowest band, 13.0% of 1,648 domains blocked at least one of the 13 AI and data crawlers we checked. In the highest band, 8.7% of...  Read More
Short answer: We took 499 US dental practice websites whose robots.txt already permitted AI crawlers and whose homepages already loaded for an ordinary browser request, then asked each server for the same homepage under real AI crawler identities. On 22 July 2026, 72 of those 499 sites — 14.4% —...  Read More
Short answer: we don't know, and we're not going to fake a confident answer to sound more authoritative than the data lets us be. In our June 2026 scan of 523 U.S. dental practices, the median practice had 250 Google reviews at a 4.9-star average — and 96.7% already sit at or above 4.3 stars, the...  Read More
Short answer: no agency can guarantee that ChatGPT will name your practice, and I'm not going to pretend otherwise to make a better pitch. AI placement can't be bought — there is no paid slot in an AI-generated recommendation, ours included. What I can give you instead is what we actually measured:...  Read More
We tracked 31 "AI visibility" agency names across 64 AI answers. Only one repeated on every run.
Short answer: there is no single, stable answer to "who are the top AI visibility companies for dentists." We asked ChatGPT and Perplexity the same 16 agency-hiring questions, twice each — 64 answers total, 7-8 August 2026 — and tracked 31 agency names across the responses. Only 20 of those 31...  Read More
Total Blog Activity
997
Total Bloggers
13,451
Total Blog Posts
4,671
Total Podcasts
1,788
Total Videos
Sponsors
Townie Perks
Townie® Poll
How many labs do you use on a regular basis?